Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1894 Short Rifle ATF Clearance
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 15
Member Since:
July 26, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
May 28, 2022 - 8:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have recently found a 1894 short rifle with a 14” barrel. To my knowledge this rifle has yet to be sent in to the ATF Firearms & Ammunition Technology Division. This gun appears to me to be a 100% correct, but is outside the Cody letter range. It has 7 3/8” forearm, mag tube hanger split in distance between the end of barrel and forend cap, and rear sight seat 4” for front of the receiver. They ask to send rifle and any supporting information to them. Has anyone done this before and have any pointers before I ship it off? What is the best reference book for short rifles so I can add that for my supporting information.

 

Thanks Matt

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10840
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
May 28, 2022 - 8:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Matt,

What is the S/N on the subject rifle?  Can you send me pictures of it?

Bert – [email protected]

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 15
Member Since:
July 26, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
May 28, 2022 - 9:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

B

Bert H. said
Matt,

What is the S/N on the subject rifle?  Can you send me pictures of it?

Bert – [email protected]

  

Bert it’s 643262. I also sent you a few pictures. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 296
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 29, 2022 - 10:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have sent 2 Marlin 1894 carbines with 15″ barrels in that were out of the available serial range, noting short forearms and pics of known short carbines and they were sent back in a few weeks with clearance letters. If their correct, it doesn’t seem to be a problem. I talked to others and they had the same results.  

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10840
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
May 29, 2022 - 3:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Matt Cox said
B

Bert H. said

Matt,

What is the S/N on the subject rifle?  Can you send me pictures of it?

Bert – [email protected]

  

Bert it’s 643262. I also sent you a few pictures. 

  

Matt,

I sent you a document (letter) that should help you with the BATF inspection and clearance letter.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 15
Member Since:
July 26, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
May 29, 2022 - 5:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

Matt Cox said

B

Bert H. said

Matt,

What is the S/N on the subject rifle?  Can you send me pictures of it?

Bert – [email protected]

  

Bert it’s 643262. I also sent you a few pictures. 

  

Matt,

I sent you a document (letter) that should help you with the BATF inspection and clearance letter.

Bert

  

Thanks for all the help! I will be sending it off this week and will update the group as to how it goes. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 15
Member Since:
July 26, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
July 11, 2022 - 9:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Just got a email back from the BATF and they have cleared the 14” 1894 short rifle and will be sending it back. Thanks for all the help!

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10840
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
July 12, 2022 - 7:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Matt Cox said
Just got a email back from the BATF and they have cleared the 14” 1894 short rifle and will be sending it back. Thanks for all the help!

  

The is great news, happy to hear it went smoothly.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4250
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
July 19, 2022 - 3:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

wolfbait said
It was easier in the past. You could just send ATF photographs and a description of a trapper and they would classify it as a C&R and remove it from NFA status.

  

That’s interesting to know.  I always assumed they had to have their hands on it before they would make their pronouncement.  I’m not surprised things have changed.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: Tony. R, JR70, freebird1968, 86Win, Michael McMurray
Guest(s) 146
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6368
TXGunNut: 5034
Chuck: 4598
1873man: 4322
steve004: 4250
Big Larry: 2344
twobit: 2295
mrcvs: 1726
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12760
Posts: 111145

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1766
Members: 8853
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation