Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1894 Short Rifle ATF Clearance
Avatar
Matt Cox
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 15
Member Since:
July 26, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
May 28, 2022 - 8:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I have recently found a 1894 short rifle with a 14” barrel. To my knowledge this rifle has yet to be sent in to the ATF Firearms & Ammunition Technology Division. This gun appears to me to be a 100% correct, but is outside the Cody letter range. It has 7 3/8” forearm, mag tube hanger split in distance between the end of barrel and forend cap, and rear sight seat 4” for front of the receiver. They ask to send rifle and any supporting information to them. Has anyone done this before and have any pointers before I ship it off? What is the best reference book for short rifles so I can add that for my supporting information.

 

Thanks Matt

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13675
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
May 28, 2022 - 8:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Matt,

What is the S/N on the subject rifle?  Can you send me pictures of it?

Bert – [email protected]

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Matt Cox
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 15
Member Since:
July 26, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
May 28, 2022 - 9:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

B

Bert H. said
Matt,

What is the S/N on the subject rifle?  Can you send me pictures of it?

Bert – [email protected]

  

Bert it’s 643262. I also sent you a few pictures. 

Avatar
cj57
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 442
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
4
May 29, 2022 - 10:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I have sent 2 Marlin 1894 carbines with 15″ barrels in that were out of the available serial range, noting short forearms and pics of known short carbines and they were sent back in a few weeks with clearance letters. If their correct, it doesn’t seem to be a problem. I talked to others and they had the same results.  

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13675
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
5
May 29, 2022 - 3:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Matt Cox said
B

Bert H. said

Matt,

What is the S/N on the subject rifle?  Can you send me pictures of it?

Bert – [email protected]

  

Bert it’s 643262. I also sent you a few pictures. 

  

Matt,

I sent you a document (letter) that should help you with the BATF inspection and clearance letter.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Matt Cox
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 15
Member Since:
July 26, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
May 29, 2022 - 5:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said

Matt Cox said

B

Bert H. said

Matt,

What is the S/N on the subject rifle?  Can you send me pictures of it?

Bert – [email protected]

  

Bert it’s 643262. I also sent you a few pictures. 

  

Matt,

I sent you a document (letter) that should help you with the BATF inspection and clearance letter.

Bert

  

Thanks for all the help! I will be sending it off this week and will update the group as to how it goes. 

Avatar
Matt Cox
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 15
Member Since:
July 26, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
July 11, 2022 - 9:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Just got a email back from the BATF and they have cleared the 14” 1894 short rifle and will be sending it back. Thanks for all the help!

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13675
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
8
July 12, 2022 - 7:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Matt Cox said
Just got a email back from the BATF and they have cleared the 14” 1894 short rifle and will be sending it back. Thanks for all the help!

  

The is great news, happy to hear it went smoothly.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5411
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
July 19, 2022 - 3:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

wolfbait said
It was easier in the past. You could just send ATF photographs and a description of a trapper and they would classify it as a C&R and remove it from NFA status.

  

That’s interesting to know.  I always assumed they had to have their hands on it before they would make their pronouncement.  I’m not surprised things have changed.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: Bert H., cj57, slk, antler1, Tedk, rogertherelic, Brandon Di Bella
Guest(s) 360
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6905
Chuck: 6246
steve004: 5411
1873man: 4798
deerhunter: 2794
twobit: 2594
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2305
Maverick: 2114
Newest Members:
Brandon Di Bella
schaubel777
Boatman1
Garnerman
EasyWind45
Fort smith Law
Frank1967c
Bigby1200
swmaynes
Randy3590
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15336
Posts: 138371

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10361
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation