Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1894 25-35 with Lyman #21 sight
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 272
Member Since:
March 6, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 6, 2014 - 10:22 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Gunbroker 386237262 Is this a rare sight? What do you think is fair value on a gun like this?

Avatar
"road king"
Guest
WACA Guest
2
January 6, 2014 - 10:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Here is the link to the rifle in question.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=386237262

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10827
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
January 6, 2014 - 10:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

No, the Lyman No. 21 sight is not "rare", but it certainly is not common either.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=386237262

That particular rifle has originality issues… the barrel has definitely been replaced, and I have to wonder about the sights.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1723
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 6, 2014 - 10:56 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The Lyman 21 sight is fairly common on 1894’s from this era. Because it is a .25-35, it is worth a bit more than a .30 WCF. Maybe $1100 to $1200, possibly as high as $1400, IF the barrel is original. I have never seen a proofmark with the P in the circle before and the other proofmark on the barrel seems weak and is double-proofed, which is not typical of a Winchester proofmark. Also, the .25-35 markings are unlike those I have seen before, both font and size. I suspect the barrel may not be original to the gun, but I am more than willing to be corrected if wrong.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1723
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
January 6, 2014 - 10:58 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
No, the Lyman No. 21 sight is not "rare", but it certainly is not common either.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=386237262

That particular rifle has originality issues… the barrel has definitely been replaced, and I have to wonder about the sights.

Bert

Bert confirmed what I said, but he types a lot faster! 😀 In any event, whatever Bert says means a lot as he is the expert and I just give my 2 cents worth!

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 400
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
January 6, 2014 - 7:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

wolfbait said
Gunbroker 386237262 Is this a rare sight? What do you think is fair value on a gun like this?

As far as fair value, with the parts barrel and the Lyman sight looks like it’s got the wrong mounting screw, I think the $750 is probably a good asking price. I don’t want it for that but someone probably will.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1723
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
January 7, 2014 - 6:03 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

wolfbait said
Gunbroker 386237262 Is this a rare sight? What do you think is fair value on a gun like this?

As far as fair value, with the parts barrel and the Lyman sight looks like it’s got the wrong mounting screw, I think the $750 is probably a good asking price. I don’t want it for that but someone probably will.

With the replaced barrel, it is not an original gun; ‘maybe’ $750 is a fair price, but sounds high even at that. I wouldn’t touch it, but that is just me! Again, if all original, it would almost be double that, I should think.

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1910
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
January 7, 2014 - 8:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

In addition to the incorrect mounting screws, the sight is also missing the lock-down lever and elevation hardware. I wouldn’t touch it.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: Bert H., wally, Brad Dunbar, rogertherelic
Guest(s) 115
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6358
TXGunNut: 5019
Chuck: 4596
1873man: 4319
steve004: 4246
Big Larry: 2339
twobit: 2293
mrcvs: 1723
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12743
Posts: 110994

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1763
Members: 8845
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation