


7:44 pm
June 26, 2013

Is this a legitimate 18" trapper? I suspect that the barrel has been shortened, but I wanted to see what others think.
10:50 pm
June 26, 2013

5:08 am
January 24, 2013

I'm with Burt, I don't see anything wrong with it.
The standard length forend would be correct for an 18 inch trapper, they used the shorter FE on the 16 inch and shorter trappers.
I have seen carbines with both blued ad white muzzles.
That's a nice 18 inch trapper in a desirable caliber, I don't have an 18 incher
9:00 am
June 26, 2013

Thanks guys. I appreciate the feedback. However, I'm a bit confused. Remember the long debate regarding that former Renneburg-owned 18" Trapper carbine that had the long forearm but the forearm band covered the barrel address? It was argued by some that it originally had the short forearm wood. Here is the link:
http://www.winchestercollector.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6098&highlight=trapper
Most Users Ever Online: 628
Currently Online: rogertherelic
43 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 16
Topics: 8356
Posts: 71289
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1131
Members: 10021
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Newest Members:
john@heilalavanilla.co.nz, ltltlc@hotmail.com, Joe Ruggiero, Rick Vanvooren, dcm357@msn.com, bryannova69@yahoo.com, sroberts92@gmail.com, obowens@live.com, ROSS@OHIOAM.COM, jefarnham@comcast.netAdministrators: admin: 4, Mike Hager: 169, Bert H.: 11131