Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1892/1886 need advice
Avatar
Thomas Foster
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 22
Member Since:
August 15, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 10, 2016 - 7:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

IMG_0176.JPGImage Enlarger

IMG_0177.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0181.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0183.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0184.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0185.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0187.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0188.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0189.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0190.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0191.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0192.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0194.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0195.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0196.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0197.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0200.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0201.JPGImage Enlarger
IMG_0203.JPGImage Enlarger
Hi all, a friend of mine passed away about 2 years ago and his brother wants to sell these two rifles. I want to make him an offer that is fair for both of us. I’ve been looking on gunbroker but prices and condition are all over the place. I know it’s tough to give a value looking at only pictures but I’m hoping the members of this forum can get me in the “ballpark”. The 1886 has had its sights replaced and an extra hole in the tang was drilled to do so.

Thank you in advance for any help/advice.

Tom

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Big Larry
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2559
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 10, 2016 - 9:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi. I cannot speak for the others, but it would appear that rifle to be worth in excess of $10,000. Beautiful rifle, best of calibers, BUT, the extra hole may be a killer for most collectors. Just my opinion.   Big Larry

Avatar
Kevin Jones
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 482
Member Since:
March 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 11, 2016 - 12:03 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Very nice! Too bad about the hole/sights. 

IMG_0805-Copy-Copy-Copy.JPG

Winchester Model 1873 44-40 circa 1886

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2505
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
October 11, 2016 - 3:43 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hello Thomas,

The Mode l1892 rifle was manufactured during April of 1928.  In this time period about 500 Take down rifles were made and the majority were in 44 WCF caliber.  These rifles also used slightly older barrels which had already been stamped with the #3 Style of barrel address stamp located above the fore end cap and the model designation on the left side under the rear sight.  The more common barrel had the address on the right side of the barrel under the rear sight.  From what I can see the rifle is 100% original and has been well cared for and not abused but with a fair amount of bluing loss on the carry point of the receiver/take down ring.  Based on the photos you have posted the rifle would rate in the +/- 70% condition range and be valued around $6000.  I suspect the bore would be almost perfect.

The 1886 look in even better condition with screaming exception of the extra hole in the upper tang for the folding peep sight.  AAAARGH!!EmbarassedEmbarassedEmbarassed For some guys that will be deal killer.  For others not so much but it will diminish the collectibility of the gun.   Some of the  serious 86 guys can advise better than me.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Old-Win
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 120
Member Since:
November 11, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
October 11, 2016 - 2:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Here’s an 86′ that just ended last evening.  Not quite as nice but close.

http://www.gunbroker.com/item/586184994

A very nice 92′ but not a takedown.

http://www.gunbroker.com/item/586380728

Avatar
Thomas Foster
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 22
Member Since:
August 15, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
October 11, 2016 - 5:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thank you Mike, Larry and Old-win for your comments and expertise. I saw the results of the Gunbroker auction but what would be a fair price on this 1886 with the extra hole in the tang? The rifle is in beautiful condition and the bores on both are practically new, but that extra hole is the issue. How much does this detract from the overall value?

Thank you all,

Tom

Avatar
Kevin Jones
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 482
Member Since:
March 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
October 11, 2016 - 6:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

The gunbroker rifle was a 40-82 with round barrel opposed to above’s 45-90 with Octagon barrel both considerable in regard to value. 

Personally, the extra hole is a deal breaker for me, however I expect some collectors may pay $10,000>$12,000 for it.

Really nice CCH. Same rifle “all-original” would be worth $15,000>$17,500 in my opinion.

A couple questions for the experts here;

Isn’t the other sight incorrect as well? 

Image Enlarger

And, shouldn’t the muzzle end for this model rifle be blued? Or was it blued at some point? 

Image Enlarger

IMG_0805-Copy-Copy-Copy.JPG

Winchester Model 1873 44-40 circa 1886

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12980
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
October 11, 2016 - 8:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Kevin Jones said 

A couple questions for the experts here;

Isn’t the other sight incorrect as well? 

Image Enlarger

And, shouldn’t the muzzle end for this model rifle be blued? Or was it blued at some point? 

Image Enlarger

  

Kevin,

The front sight is a Lyman No. 5B, which could have been special ordered.  They are found on a fair number of different Winchester rifles.

Winchester always left the muzzle face in the white (not blued) on all of the octagon barreled rifles.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Kevin Jones
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 482
Member Since:
March 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
October 11, 2016 - 9:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said

Kevin,

The front sight is a Lyman No. 5B, which could have been special ordered.  They are found on a fair number of different Winchester rifles.

Winchester always left the muzzle face in the white (not blued) on all of the octagon barreled rifles.

Bert  

That’s right SRCs are blued, I had it backwards. Thanks Bert, a lot to remember!!!

IMG_0805-Copy-Copy-Copy.JPG

Winchester Model 1873 44-40 circa 1886

Avatar
Thomas Foster
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 22
Member Since:
August 15, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
October 12, 2016 - 12:25 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

 So as I understand the extra tang hole is a $5k ouch.Frown Also can anyone identify the rear sight?  I really appreciate everyone’s information. I wouldn’t know what would be fair without you guys. Thank you all so very much for your time and input.

Tom

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12980
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
October 12, 2016 - 12:30 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thomas Foster said
 So as I understand the extra tang hole is a $5k ouch.Frown Also can anyone identify the rear sight?  I really appreciate everyone’s information. I wouldn’t know what would be fair without you guys. Thank you all so very much for your time and input.

Tom  

Tom,

The tang sight on your Model 1886 is a Lyman No. 103 Micrometer Windgauge sight.  It will have an application code stamped in the steel base (on the underside).  Depending on what that application code is, the sight is worth $425 – $650 all by itself.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2505
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
October 12, 2016 - 12:31 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thomas Foster said
 So as I understand the extra tang hole is a $5k ouch.Frown Also can anyone identify the rear sight?  I really appreciate everyone’s information. I wouldn’t know what would be fair without you guys. Thank you all so very much for your time and input.

Tom  

Tom,

Yes that extra little hole is a big $$ pit!  But, you can always get a correct tang peep for the 1886 which will cover the entire tang and will screw into the small unused screw on the tang and at least you will then never see the blemish!  Out of sight…. out of mind?

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: 1ned1, rogertherelic, DEEREHART, Henry Mero, morsece, 86Win, Zebulon
Guest(s) 402
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6461
Chuck: 5868
steve004: 5209
1873man: 4703
deerhunter: 2711
Big Larry: 2559
twobit: 2505
mrcvs: 2212
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
spikemiller
ob98
Ricky Summer
Peter Cipollini
Jhark
Oldtimer52
parkerposy
rayhobbs
WebleyScott
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14809
Posts: 132528

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10046
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation