Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1892 Carbine: Factory Redo?
Avatar
Private Smith
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 35
Member Since:
June 10, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 18, 2026 - 6:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I recently purchased this carbine at a local gun shop. 

Serial #301433

The underside of the barrel has “44WCF  52” I presume the 52 is the barrel date?

Your opinions are welcome. 

Thanks

2843FC5B-359C-4244-990D-78AC5F51DC5B.JPG35341CC3-2DFA-45AF-A777-4B86C4AF4397.JPG2AC43EBF-A9C8-4BDB-B2DB-70EE48951662.JPG10.18.26-Win-1.jpg97F73F83-6396-4EF8-8B1D-BE030DE79552.JPGA6E5008D-A81A-4D6F-8405-3E3DB5A8A5C6.JPGF2760449-80B6-48C6-8466-DEB208C6D4C1.JPGwin5.jpg

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14866
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 18, 2026 - 8:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

It appears that your 1905 production Model 1892 SRC was sent back to Winchester in (or after) 1952 and had a new barrel  installed.  In addition to the new barrel, the magazine tube was replaced, and new stocks were installed.  Further, the saddle ring staple was removed and the holes filled.  The short forend stock, and the flat checkered steel butt plate are both post-WW II pieces.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Private Smith
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 35
Member Since:
June 10, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 18, 2026 - 8:28 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Thanks Bert. That’s what I figured, and it’s good to get confirmation from an expert.

I haven’t encountered many ’92’s with a ramp front sight. It was the first thing that caught my eye while it was on the rifle rack.

Additionally, I’ve read somewhere that the numbers stamped on the lever, lower tang, etc, are bin numbers for factory redo’s.  

Mine has 305 stamped on the lower tang and the lever.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14866
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
October 18, 2026 - 8:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Private Smith said
Thanks Bert. That’s what I figured, and it’s good to get confirmation from an expert.
I haven’t encountered many ’92’s with a ramp front sight. It was the first thing that caught my eye while it was on the rifle rack.
  

Winchester began using the ramp front sights co-incident with the introduction of CMS (Proof Steel) barrels in the year 1932 for the Model 94, and I assume that the Model 92 was similar.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2756
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
October 20, 2026 - 9:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Private Smith said
Thanks Bert. That’s what I figured, and it’s good to get confirmation from an expert.
I haven’t encountered many ’92’s with a ramp front sight. It was the first thing that caught my eye while it was on the rifle rack.
Additionally, I’ve read somewhere that the numbers stamped on the lever, lower tang, etc, are bin numbers for factory redo’s.  
Mine has 305 stamped on the lower tang and the lever.
  

Hello,

I have sampled 164 carbines with the ramp style front sight while working on my research survey of the Model 1892 rifles.  I do not have Good images of the proof stamps on all of the rifles but 49 of them have Oval/P proofs designating non factory replacements.  71 rifles have just the W/P proof stamp indicating factory work.  The balance (44 rifles) have “no data” for the barrel proofs.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Private Smith
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 35
Member Since:
June 10, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
October 21, 2026 - 2:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

twobit said

Private Smith said
Thanks Bert. That’s what I figured, and it’s good to get confirmation from an expert.
I haven’t encountered many ’92’s with a ramp front sight. It was the first thing that caught my eye while it was on the rifle rack.
Additionally, I’ve read somewhere that the numbers stamped on the lever, lower tang, etc, are bin numbers for factory redo’s.  
Mine has 305 stamped on the lower tang and the lever.
  

Hello,
I have sampled 164 carbines with the ramp style front sight while working on my research survey of the Model 1892 rifles.  I do not have Good images of the proof stamps on of the rifles but 49 of them have Oval/P proofs designating non factory replacements.  71 rifles have just the W/P proof stamp indicating factory work.  The balance (44 rifles) have “no data” for the barrel proofs.
Michael
  

Thanks Michael for your update. Chris

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: Bill Hockett, Chuck, Mark Douglas, Byron Russell, TXGunNut, Zebulon, Blue Ridge Parson, Honest Jon
Guest(s) 228
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7700
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6901
steve004: 5865
1873man: 4995
deerhunter: 3077
twobit: 2756
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2535
Zebulon: 2462
Newest Members:
Steve.Tanner1024
Accuarc
sparky
dmk
trapdoor
WinDane
Montana 3-7-77
AC1873
Espi
Tachelberry
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 16382
Posts: 150114

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 11038
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation