Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1886 question
Avatar
Don
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 20
Member Since:
November 7, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 2, 2025 - 3:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I was looking at an 1886 that’s up for discussion and was curious regarding value. It’s a 19 inch barrel with a short magazine tube, flush with the fore end. No saddle ring. Front site has a screw fixing the right side in the dovetail. Octagon barrel SN 62594

Avatar
Agent1911
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 26
Member Since:
May 5, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 2, 2025 - 3:22 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Don said
I was looking at an 1886 that’s up for discussion and was curious regarding value. It’s a 19 inch barrel with a short magazine tube, flush with the fore end. No saddle ring. Front site has a screw fixing the right side in the dovetail. Octagon barrel SN 62594

  

Don, does this Rifle happen to be in 40-65?

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12976
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 2, 2025 - 3:26 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Don,

Hopefully the barrel is actually 20-inchs in length, as a 19-inch length strongly indicates a cut down (shortened) barrel.  You did not mention the specific cartridge/caliber that it chambered for and that will have a significant effect on the potential value.

Can you provide pictures of the rifle?

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Don
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 20
Member Since:
November 7, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 2, 2025 - 4:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Yes 40-65 

I may have to wait until I’m at a computer. I can’t seem to get the tab to pull pictures from my phone. 

Avatar
Don
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 20
Member Since:
November 7, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 2, 2025 - 5:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

IMG_9008.jpegImage Enlarger

IMG_8997.jpegImage Enlarger
IMG_8999.jpegImage Enlarger
IMG_9007.jpegImage Enlarger
IMG_9009.jpegImage Enlarger
IMG_9010.jpegImage Enlarger
IMG_9011.jpegImage Enlarger
IMG_9012.jpegImage Enlarger
IMG_9013.jpegImage Enlarger
IMG_9014.jpegImage Enlarger
IMG_9016.jpegImage Enlarger
IMG_9023.jpegImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
cj57
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 425
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
February 2, 2025 - 5:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Unfortunately the barrel and the magazine tube have been shortened, drastically lowering the value it does not have much blue finish. If the bore is good the value would be as a shooter

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12976
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
February 2, 2025 - 6:33 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

cj57 said
Unfortunately the barrel and the magazine tube have been shortened, drastically lowering the value it does not have much blue finish. If the bore is good the value would be as a shooter

  

Concur, and the barrel actually measures 19.5″.  The front sight is too close to the muzzle face. The ugly extra hole in the butt stock is another serious demerit.  At best, it is a $1,200 rifle.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Don
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 20
Member Since:
November 7, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
February 2, 2025 - 7:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thank you all. 

Avatar
Agent1911
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 26
Member Since:
May 5, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
February 4, 2025 - 12:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said

cj57 said

Unfortunately the barrel and the magazine tube have been shortened, drastically lowering the value it does not have much blue finish. If the bore is good the value would be as a shooter

  

Concur, and the barrel actually measures 19.5″.  The front sight is too close to the muzzle face. The ugly extra hole in the butt stock is another serious demerit.  At best, it is a $1,200 rifle.

Bert

  

You are spot on. I know this rifle. It is also an extra heavy barrel which makes me all kinds of sad.

Avatar
Agent1911
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 26
Member Since:
May 5, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
February 4, 2025 - 12:18 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Don said
Thank you all. 

  

It appears we are fishing in the same pond. Lol

Good luck to you.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: TXGunNut, Ben, Jeremy P
Guest(s) 629
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6444
Chuck: 5856
steve004: 5209
1873man: 4702
deerhunter: 2711
Big Larry: 2554
twobit: 2504
mrcvs: 2210
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
Peter Cipollini
Jhark
Oldtimer52
parkerposy
rayhobbs
WebleyScott
Task1
1886
Jerome Stevens
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14805
Posts: 132472

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10044
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation