Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
1
May 24, 2020 - 5:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Can anyone provide the changes that were made to the 86 and what year. My recent acquisition is an original lettered round barrel 45-90 made in 1888 and the buttstock is thicker & barrel heavier than my 40-65 and 45-70 made in 1897 & 1898.

AG

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4601
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
May 24, 2020 - 6:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Have you actually measured the barrel?  Does the wood fit the receiver and butt plate perfectly?  Pirkle says that Winchester had 2 different sizes of wood blanks based upon the action.  The 76 and 86 had a larger blank than the other lever actions.  In 1895 the blank for the 86 was made smaller.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
3
May 24, 2020 - 6:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Ok 1895 thanks Chuck. And the barrels are bigger(thicker) on these two so I guess this would be classified as a design change ? in 1895 on 86’s.

AG

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 24, 2020 - 7:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Rick,

You need to get a copy of John Madl’s book on the Model 1886… it contains lots of the details that you are looking for.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
5
May 24, 2020 - 7:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Yes that would be a wise purchase. Thanks Bert.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4601
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
May 24, 2020 - 7:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

AG said
Ok 1895 thanks Chuck. And the barrels are bigger(thicker) on these two so I guess this would be classified as a design change ? in 1895 on 86’s.

AG  

I have no info on standard barrel dimensional changes.  The easiest measurement to take is at the muzzle.  The diameter should be 11/16″ plus or minus 1/16″ for a round barrel.  A heavy barrel is 55/64″ plus or minus 5/64″.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
7
May 24, 2020 - 7:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have the letter. There’s no mention of being a heavy barrel but maybe they didn’t state it for that time period. I’ll go measure it. It never crossed my mind it could be a heavy barrel.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
8
May 24, 2020 - 7:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said

I have no info on standard barrel dimensional changes.  The easiest measurement to take is at the muzzle.  The diameter should be 11/16″ plus or minus 1/16″ for a round barrel.  A heavy barrel is 55/64″ plus or minus 5/64″.  

9/16 on the DOM 1888 & 7/16 on the DOM 1897.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4601
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
May 24, 2020 - 8:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

What did you use to take these measurements?  These are in the lightweight area?  Not standard or heavy.  Should be closer to 11/16″.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4601
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
May 24, 2020 - 8:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

The first picture shows the standard measurement.  The second one is closer to a lightweight measurement.  Do you have a Letter for the one with the smaller measurement?

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
12
May 24, 2020 - 9:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Chuck said
The first picture shows the standard measurement.  The second one is closer to a lightweight measurement.  Do you have a Letter for the one with the smaller measurement?  

9/16 is the 1888 DOM and the 7/16 is the 1897 DOM both lettered, both standard 26” barrels in original condition. My other 45-70 DOM 1898 is 7/16 & my buddy’s DOM 1886 is 9/16.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
13
May 25, 2020 - 1:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

John M just replied this morning & advised the same as you Chuck that the year was 1895. He said demand was for lighter guns so barrels were lightened up & the ELW & light weights were introduced also.
He went on to say Winchester consolidated the Butt Plates to the 86,85,92,94 and made the 86 stocks smaller which became standard then.
As well the early 86 butt plates were the same as the 1876 with a turned down toe and heavier stocks.

Good information for any 1886 collectors. Appreciate the replies Chuck.

AG(Rick C)

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4601
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
May 25, 2020 - 7:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Based upon what I went through on my 1887 shotgun I believe that the same happened to these stocks too?

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
15
May 25, 2020 - 7:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said
Based upon what I went through on my 1887 shotgun I believe that the same happened to these stocks too?  

Yes I would agree Chuck.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6388
TXGunNut: 5057
Chuck: 4601
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2351
twobit: 2306
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12787
Posts: 111392

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8872
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation