Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1873 Heavy Barrel 44-40
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Guest
Guest
WACA Guest
1
May 27, 2013 - 9:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Lets chat about 1873s with a heavy barrel. About 15 years ago I acquired (imported) several 1873 Winchester’s from Australia. One of which was a 44-40 and had a 20” barrel. It always looked to me to be larger than the average octagon 1873 barrel. Just recently I got back into my 73’s and also was reading “The WinchesterBook” by George Madis. On page 181 he discussed standard barrels, “Buffalo Barrels”, and the rarely found “heavy barrel” which are slightly heavier than the standard barrel. So my curiosity got the better of me and using my micrometer I mic’d the barrel in question at the muzzle end of the 20” barrel. I mic’d it at .847”. I then mic’d my other 1873’s at the 20” mark (even though they were 24” barrels). They all mic’d .768” to .774”. I am now convinced that I truly have a “heavy barrel” 1873. Any thoughts out there about my 73 and if you mic yours at 20” what do you come up with?

http://s1230.photobucket.com/user/Elker_43/media/d6693b01-f451-4078-ac22-0c0af349cb7f.jpg.html

d6693b01-f451-4078-ac22-0c0af349cb7f.jpgImage Enlargerhttp://s1230.photobucket.com/user/Elker_43/media/35654325-e9c8-4592-a3f8-d1876aab48b9.jpg.html

[Image Can Not Be Found]

http://s1230.photobucket.com/user/Elker_43/media/2923dee0-c89c-4d81-ba12-95eb719b8b9f.jpg.html

[Image Can Not Be Found]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 184
Member Since:
October 6, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
May 28, 2013 - 5:26 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Elker, do you have the factory info on the gun?

Avatar
Guest
Guest
WACA Guest
3
May 28, 2013 - 6:08 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

No, not yet and thanks for your reply. I am collecting info about the micrometer readings at the 20" mark on 73’s to validate my reasoning that the barrel I have is a "heavy barrel". If you have a 73 and access to a micrometer, what do you get for a reading. With over 80 73s and 92s, I can probably spend a fortune getting factory info at this point on many of my Winchesters? Just need some help from others…..Thanks!
http://s1230.photobucket.com/user/Elker_43/media/IMG_3343.jpg.html

IMG_3343.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 28, 2013 - 7:44 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Elker,

What is the forearm length of your 20" gun and was the 24" guns all 44 caliber? The 24" guns you measured at .770" is near the minimum muzzle size of the 44 caliber guns which is .750" with the maximum muzzle size is .closer to 853".

As far as I’ve been able to determine there is no Heavy barrel or middle weight barrel as Madis talked about. Just a wide variation in barrel diameters. The records show Heavy barrels but those guns are at least 1" at the muzzle.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 184
Member Since:
October 6, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
May 28, 2013 - 7:52 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Elker, I’ll look and see if I still have the measurements on the 20" heavy barrel I sold a few years back. If not Rob Kassab did a article on the gun in the last issue of WACA, I bet he has the info.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2354
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
May 28, 2013 - 12:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Many years ago, I had a M1873 with the 20" heavy bbl, carbine stock, and no saddle ring. It all lettered. BTW it looks exactly like the one on the cover of the latest Winchester Collectors magazine. I would not be surprised if it was the same rifle. If I remember right it had a "3" under the bbl. The letter said "20" bbl. heavy" Big Larry

Avatar
Guest
Guest
WACA Guest
7
May 28, 2013 - 8:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873Man
I measured the forearm and it is a standard 9 1/2" forearm. I pulled the forearm looking for maybe an indication of something different and there is no tale tail stamping under the forearm on the barrel. I also mic’d the barrel where it screws into the receiver and it mic’s .942. all of the others mic .885.

I am still at a loss as to why Madis would describe a "heavy barrel" vs. the "Buffalo Barrel" as to something in between a standard barrel and a buffalo and being a rarety?? Untill I get a few folks to mic a few 44-40 barrels at the 20" mark I am at a loss. I may just have a cut down 24" barrel to 20" but the question still arises. It really looks factory and the front sight bevel cut is exactly 3/4" from the muzzle as are all of my other 73s. The muzzle end is a nice clean factory looking muzzle end without tapering.

Any other suggestions? And thanks for your response!

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
May 28, 2013 - 9:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Elker,

I while back I and John E. started a survey of 73 barrel diameters and I have 49 44 caliber guns in it. The average from my list is .944" so your gun (.942") is a standard barrel and since the forearm is full length it tells me it was cut down from at least a 24" barrel. Did you check with Cody to see how it letters?

Your other guns that measure .885" indicate from the survey that breech size is from a 32 or 38 caliber.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Guest
Guest
WACA Guest
9
May 28, 2013 - 11:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man….
Looks like all of the work you guys did in the past has solved this one! I thank you for your honest and many hours of work to give me the immediate answer. Next will be an inquiry to Cody to clear it completely up.

Thanks again to you and those that answered my post I can now sleep well! BTW, this 73 has a mirror bore and shoots true.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 28
Member Since:
February 6, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
April 8, 2018 - 12:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I see this is kinda an old post but i had a bit to add in. In the early 70’s i bought a 73 winchester in 32-20 out in Alberta during a visit. \when i got it home and got really looking at it i noticed a few things somewhat different. The round barrel was extra heavy. It was an odd length compared to the books and did not appeared cut. The top of the barrel was flat the same as if they were going to start milling it into an octagon bbl. It had the corrrect writing on the top. The front site was a flip up with a hood if you wanted it. I sold/traded it to a collecter in Sault Ste Marie early 80’s. 

  Last year i heard that the lad in the Sault had sold all his extensive collection to Hank Williams Junior. Texas..  

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
April 8, 2018 - 5:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Texas,

The round barrel should have a small flat milled where the rear sight sets. Did that gun have a flat down the entire length? Did you letter it? Do you know the serial number?

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2306
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
April 8, 2018 - 5:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Elker_43 said

No, not yet and thanks for your reply. I am collecting info about the micrometer readings at the 20″ mark on 73’s to validate my reasoning that the barrel I have is a “heavy barrel”. If you have a 73 and access to a micrometer, what do you get for a reading. With over 80 73s and 92s, I can probably spend a fortune getting factory info at this point on many of my Winchesters? Just need some help from others…..Thanks!

<img src="http://s1230.photobucket.com/user/Elker_43/media/IMG_3337.jpg.html

IMG_3337.jpgImage Enlarger ” alt=”http://s1230.photobucket.com/user/Elker_43/media/IMG_3337.jpg.html

IMG_3337.jpgImage Enlarger ” />http://s1230.photobucket.com/user/Elker_43/media/IMG_3343.jpg.html

IMG_3343.jpgImage Enlarger  

Hello Elker_43,

I am conducting a research survey on the Model 1892/92 rifles and would absolutely love to add yours if they are not so entered yet.  Can I please get a list of the serial numbers so that I can check it against my data?  My email address is [email protected]    https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-survey-discussion/winchester-model-1892-all-rifle-survey/

Thanks so much for any assistance.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: pdog72, mrcvs, MCorrell, Steven Gabrielli, Edward Kitner, SureShot
Guest(s) 226
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6388
TXGunNut: 5057
Chuck: 4601
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2353
twobit: 2306
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12787
Posts: 111397

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8872
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation