Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1866 Saddle Ring Carbine
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Guest
Guest
WACA Guest
1
July 25, 2013 - 7:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Just wondering if this rifle looks like it is all original, refinished or not, and what it’s value may be. The only marking I can find is the serial number behind the trigger, I don’t see anything on the barrel. I do believe that it was manufactured in 1870. Thanks for any help.

http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6838.jpg.html

IMG_6838.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6864.jpg.html

IMG_6864.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6850.jpg.html

IMG_6850.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6866.jpg.html

IMG_6866.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6840.jpg.html

IMG_6840.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6872.jpg.html

IMG_6872.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6844.jpg.html

IMG_6844.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6874.jpg.html

IMG_6874.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6845.jpg.html

IMG_6845.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6895.jpg.html

IMG_6895.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6892.jpg.html

IMG_6892.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6880.jpg.html

IMG_6880.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6885.jpg.html

IMG_6885.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6869.jpg.html

IMG_6869.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6899.jpg.html

IMG_6899.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6898.jpg.html

IMG_6898.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6896.jpg.html

IMG_6896.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6893.jpg.html

[Image Can Not Be Found]
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6890.jpg.html

IMG_6890.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6884.jpg.html

IMG_6884.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6883.jpg.html

IMG_6883.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6869.jpg.html

IMG_6869.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6905.jpg.html

IMG_6905.jpgImage Enlarger
http://s404.photobucket.com/user/ezeeone/media/Firearms/Rifles/IMG_6901.jpg.html

IMG_6901.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2306
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
July 25, 2013 - 7:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hello,

The receiver has definitely been buffed, resulting in soft and rounded edges. The wood has been sanded and refinished. The barrel should be marked similar to the photo below.
[Image Can Not Be Found]

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
July 25, 2013 - 7:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

No, it does not look original (nor is it).

Nearly all of the screws are replacements, the receiver frame has been harshly buffed/polished and cleaned. Both barrel bands are mounted backwards, the butt stock is cracked & repaired, and has been sanded & refinished. Neither the front or rear sight is original.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
July 25, 2013 - 7:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I would add that the lower tang may have been broken or bent and straightened. There is a suspicious line running across it through the lever latch. I would guess it worth $3500 to $4000.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2306
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
July 25, 2013 - 8:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bob,

Does the serial number look a little ‘too fresh’ to you? The lower tang has obviously beed buffed transverse to its length and there are numerous indentations around the numbers yet the individual digits are not marred and are not very smoothed over from the buffing.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
July 25, 2013 - 8:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Michael,

I saw the denting, I figure the gun was fairly bad shape and that is reason for the extreme buffing but they just did the minimum around the numbers to preserve them.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 192
Member Since:
September 9, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
July 26, 2013 - 5:54 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

And the wire wheel they used on the rusty and pitted barrel removed what was left of markings.

Avatar
Guest
Guest
WACA Guest
8
July 27, 2013 - 12:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for all the replies and info gentlemen. I figured that since it didn’t have any markings on the barrel and the stocks are in such good condition for its age that it had some work done to it, I just didn’t know to what extent.

I’ve tried to do some research on this rifle since I posted this and I’ve seen different "issues" and "models" referred to from 1st to 4th. What designates the different models? Is there a website that details all of the changes that Winchester made to the 1866 model?

Thanks

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
July 27, 2013 - 12:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The Carbine in question is a 3rd variation Model 1866. I am not aware of a website that discusses the 1st through 4th variations, but my good friend Larry Shennum and I discussed it in Chapter 3 of our reference book "The RED BOOK of WINCHESTER Values".

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: Maverick, keith shaffer
Guest(s) 214
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6388
TXGunNut: 5057
Chuck: 4601
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2351
twobit: 2306
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12787
Posts: 111392

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8872
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation