Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1864 New Haven Arms Henry Rifle, Serial No. 7516 — Seeking Collector Input
Avatar
Brodg88
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 20
Member Since:
March 4, 2026
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
July 16, 2026 - 3:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

LADD-014-1.jpeg

 

I’m looking for informed collector feedback on an original brass-frame New Haven Arms Henry rifle, serial no. 7516, believed to be 1864 production. This was a gift to me in a set of a few other guns from a friend whose father was a former collector and she wanted me to have them. I don’t know how to begin trying to “authenticate” it but here’s where I am so far.

1. The rifle has matching serial numbers on the top barrel flat, lower tang under the stock, stock inlet, and inside buttplate. There’s an “&” on the tang but no other markings I can find.

2. As far as google can help me tell, it retains late-production Henry features including the Type II brass frame, pointed buttplate, sling swivel and barrel loop, correct-style folding ladder rear sight marked 1–8 with center notch and elevator stop screw, and the large two-line New Haven Arms barrel address (Pictured).

3. The stock is crack-free with very tight wood-to-metal fit and retains the original Henry “bump” below the left-side sling swivel area. Is that even possible with a gun that is dated to be this old? The brass frame is very clean with attractive aged patina, tight sideplate fit, and no major dents or damage. Basically, it seems very clean and again, I don’t know if that’s reasonable for something dated back to the 1860s

4.The barrel/magazine has smooth aged patina with crisp markings. but there is no Bluing left on it.  Bore shows clear rifling with minor pitting. The cleaning rod is present in the buttstock. An old leather sling with hook-style attachments is present, though the adjuster is marked “Pat. Jan. 12, 1897,” so I’m treating the sling as a later accessory.

5. Per my little Winchester handbook, The serial number falls within the 7000–8000 range. so 1864 manufacture?

I would appreciate any knowledgeable input on originality, configuration, cleaning rod/sight correctness, etc. Photos available for review.

Avatar
Jeremy P
The Great State
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1240
Member Since:
April 30, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
July 16, 2026 - 3:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

A damn fine gift!

Avatar
Darrin Smith
Central Kansas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 260
Member Since:
March 21, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
July 16, 2026 - 3:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

1865, according to the “when was your Winchester made” link found under the resources tab at the top of the WACA forum page.

Looks like that one definitely checks all the boxes. Nice!!

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14408
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
4
July 16, 2026 - 5:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I sent Rob Kassab a link to this topic.  He is a resident Henry Guru.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6743
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
July 16, 2026 - 5:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I think the sling is newer than the rifle but it looks good on the gun.

Avatar
Anthony
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1714
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
6
July 16, 2026 - 5:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Benjamin,

I also like you’re Henry, and am glad you are sharing it here with us. From the pictures that you posted, I don’t see any red flags, as everything looks correct to me. I’ll try to touch on a few points that you did also.

I agree with Darrin as the 1865 being the year of manufacture. Using the resource here on the WACA site is you’re best reference. You’re ” little Winchester Handbook “, is an already older and outdated way to reference Winchester dates of manufacture.

Most of the surviving Henry’s we’re well used and had little if any bluing on the barrel.

The sling might be later as you said as I’m not sure on the slings buckle, but the Swivels look good to me, from the pictures. Others can verify that better.

It’s neat having the cleaning rod in the butt.

Having verified the stamped numbers on the other parts that you’re pictures show is definitely a plus!

I’m not sure of the “&” stamp on the tang. As much as it might look familiar, I can’t remember if I ever knew what it means. We have some other members who could possibly help with identifying it. In many cases we see a “W”, or an “H”, there or behind the screw.

I’m thinking you’re post Civil War Henry, or late Civil War Henry, ( 4/12/1861-5/26/1865 ), is a “Type ll” Martially marked rifle. A “AWM”, or a “JT”, military inspectors stamp would be stamped on the left side of the but stock wrist. I’m not sure when yours was made in 1865! 

A very nice Henry rifle!

Tony

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6743
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
July 16, 2026 - 5:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

This Henry is not in the correct serial number range for a later military rifle.  Take a picture of the cleaning rod.  It is really hard to tell the difference of an original metal rod and the repos so I wouldn’t worry about it.  

Avatar
Anthony
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1714
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
8
July 16, 2026 - 5:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Chuck said
This Henry is not in the correct serial number range for a later military rifle.  Take a picture of the cleaning rod.  It is really hard to tell the difference of an original metal rod and the repos so I wouldn’t worry about it.  
  

Chuck,

I am pretty sure serial numbers between  7000-9000, are “Type ll martial” Henry Rifles. I have one so marked a few hundred numbers under the one mentioned. These were Mfg. in 1864, and 1865.

If I remember correctly, this one I have has the “JT”, on the wrist.

Tony

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6743
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
July 16, 2026 - 5:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Anthony said

Chuck said
This Henry is not in the correct serial number range for a later military rifle.  Take a picture of the cleaning rod.  It is really hard to tell the difference of an original metal rod and the repos so I wouldn’t worry about it.  
  

Chuck,
I am pretty sure serial numbers between  7000-9000, are “Type ll martial” Henry Rifles. I have one so marked a few hundred numbers under the one mentioned. These were Mfg. in 1864, and 1865.
Tony
  

That proves never say never.  Does it have the later stamp or the earlier stamps?

Avatar
Anthony
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1714
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
10
July 16, 2026 - 5:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Chuck said

Anthony said

Chuck said
This Henry is not in the correct serial number range for a later military rifle.  Take a picture of the cleaning rod.  It is really hard to tell the difference of an original metal rod and the repos so I wouldn’t worry about it.  
  

Chuck,
I am pretty sure serial numbers between  7000-9000, are “Type ll martial” Henry Rifles. I have one so marked a few hundred numbers under the one mentioned. These were Mfg. in 1864, and 1865.
Tony
  

That proves never say never.  Does it have the later stamp or the earlier stamps?
  

The Later!

To add to that I only think a few hundred Henry’s had that, or at least less than one thousand. Springfield Research might be able to verify that better, as it’s been awhile since I contacted them on it.

Tony

Avatar
Rob Kassab
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 107
Member Since:
February 22, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
July 16, 2026 - 7:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

TOMH-AWM-Mark.jpgTOMH-JT-Mark-1.JPGNice looking Henry and I concur with pother that I don’t see any “red flags” except perhaps the leather sling.

Taks a real close look on the left side of the wrist for either a JT or AWS mark.  Attached are some photos.

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

Rob Kassab

Director & Executive Editor

Winchester Arms Collectors Association

1895Book.com

RareWinchesters.com

To greatly enhance your collecting experience, join WACA. It's only $35 / year (eMembership), and you'll be able to directly upload photos on the forum, receive the e-version of our quarterly magazine and have full online access to our magazine archive database, along with many other member benefits such as 15 additional record searches for Cody Firearms Museum members.  It’s easy to join at http://winchestercollector.org/register/.

Avatar
martin rabeno
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 64
Member Since:
February 22, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
July 16, 2026 - 10:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I have a Henry in the same serial range. With the inspectors mark on the wrist it is military. They were issued to the 3rd US Vol Veterans Infantry Div

The gun was issued to the volunteers as an sigh on bonus as they could take the gun with them when they muster out. Mine was issued to a Abraham Josephs. Check with Vonny  at The Horse soldier. She researched the serial number at the National Archive’s and found all sorts of goodies for me on my rifle  Like muster cards and even a ledger Paige of him signing for the rifle

You have a good one

Avatar
Anthony
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1714
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
13
July 17, 2026 - 1:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

martin rabeno said
I have a Henry in the same serial range. With the inspectors mark on the wrist it is military. They were issued to the 3rd US Vol Veterans Infantry Div
The gun was issued to the volunteers as an sigh on bonus as they could take the gun with them when they muster out. Mine was issued to a Abraham Josephs. Check with Vonny  at The Horse soldier. She researched the serial number at the National Archive’s and found all sorts of goodies for me on my rifle  Like muster cards and even a ledger Paige of him signing for the rifle
You have a good one
  

Martin,

I appreciate that information as I sent Vonny an email, @ “The Horse Soldier”, to see what he might have on mine. Much appreciated.

 

Tony

Avatar
martin rabeno
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 64
Member Since:
February 22, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
July 17, 2026 - 2:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Anthony.   I also on my own found his tombstone here in Philadelphia at mt Sinai cemetery. Need to get there and take a photo of the rifle against the tombstone   My rifle is number 7250   Let me know what she finds or you. She’s good.

marty

Avatar
Anthony
is currently browsing this topic
Avatar
Bill Yadlosky
is currently browsing this topic
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: Bert H., tionesta1, Anthony, Louis Luttrell, TR, 86Win, [email protected], Bill Yadlosky, Zebulon, Robert Drummond Jr, Turbo 1886, MidwestCrisis
Guest(s) 185
Currently Browsing this Page: Anthony, Bill Yadlosky
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7432
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6743
steve004: 5706
1873man: 4927
deerhunter: 3010
twobit: 2702
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2468
Maverick: 2190
Newest Members:
30-40
Guns.com
TwoQ
Rom_c
@leatherstitcher
Judge James DeRossitt
John DeRossitt
Frank DeRossitt
Jeff Evans
Cody L. Smith
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15989
Posts: 145785

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10802
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation