Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
UK WW1 Lord Nunburnholme Gift of 1,000 Model 1892 SRC Febuary 1915
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Sydney Australia
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 159
Member Since:
February 4, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 10, 2022 - 11:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Most people are familiar with the 20,000 model 1892 SRC in .44WCF purchased by the British Admiralty during 1915 and issued to misalliances craft. These bear the DCP mark.

 

In addition there is the purchase of a 1,000 carbines by Lord Nunburnholme in February 1915 and then gifted to the nation. I have never found anything related to this purchase in the Mccracken Library unfortunately. I did contact the current Lord Nunburnholme but he had no knowledge of his Grandfathers time in the war. The family name is Wilson and they made their money in shipping.

 

Some Model 1892 SRC in .44WCF have been observed without the DCP mark but bearing a typical British ordnance proof mark of crossed pennants. These examples are rare.I have only recorded 3 of these in my data base. It is not known for certain if this marking was applied to the Lord Nunburnholme purchase/gift but it seems likely.

 

Does anyone else have one of these carbines with this marking that I can add to my survey?

 

Regards

 

AlanD

 

Win-92-Brit-Proof-1.jpgImage EnlargerWin-92-Brit-Proof-2.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Sydney Australia
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 159
Member Since:
February 4, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
June 4, 2022 - 7:57 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Bump.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2838
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
June 6, 2022 - 8:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Hello Alan,

What SN’s do you have with this proof stamp?  I will check my data and take a look.  Though I may have missed one or two thinking that they were marked with the DCP stamp.  

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Sydney Australia
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 159
Member Since:
February 4, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
June 8, 2022 - 10:18 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Hi Michael

 

I have only 4.

 

7083XX

783722

788731

790944

 

Looking at the first one listed I wonder if this is a typo and the s/n is really, 7830XX ?

 

Regards

 

Alan

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2838
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
June 8, 2022 - 11:08 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Hello Alan,

So far I have not found any additional examples in my data.  It is a bit laborious as I have to look at each image file folder for the DCP marked guns on my list to see if I misinterpreted the proof style.  I should be able to complete the search today.  I do agree that the SN 7083XX is most likely a typo.

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 628
Currently Online: Bill Hockett, Big Mac
Guest(s) 1
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
1873man: 5143
clarence: 4051
TXGunNut: 3742
Chuck: 3379
steve004: 2965
twobit: 2838
Maverick: 1980
JWA: 1754
Big Larry: 1677
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 16
Topics: 10129
Posts: 87365

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1375
Members: 11341
Moderators: 3
Admins: 3
Navigation