Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
M1 Carbine
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 92
Member Since:
February 26, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
September 6, 2024 - 12:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I stopped to see an old collector friend yesterday.  He’s been selling off his 40 year collection over the last couple of years, many of which now live in my safe. I bought a couple of guns (as usual 😂), but before I left he reached into the back of his safe and pulled out an M1 carbine that I didn’t know he had. I know nothing about them, but I was immediately interested anyway.  Dangerous, yes…. I know. He told me to take it home with me, and if I want it, to send him $1500.00, if not, bring it back. Pretty nice arrangement actually.

I’ll post some pictures.  I’m sure the stock has been redone, but otherwise not sure what is correct or not.  I’d like opinions, and wonder if $1500.00 is a fair price.IMG_1831.jpegIMG_1832.jpegIMG_1833.jpegIMG_1834.jpegIMG_1835.jpegIMG_1836.jpegIMG_1837.jpegIMG_1838.jpegIMG_1839.jpeg

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

IMG_0767.jpeg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 92
Member Since:
February 26, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
September 6, 2024 - 1:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

IMG_1853.jpegHere’s a few more….

IMG_1840.jpegIMG_1841.jpegIMG_1842.jpegIMG_1844.jpegIMG_1845.jpegIMG_1846.jpegIMG_1849.jpeg

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

IMG_0767.jpeg

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
September 6, 2024 - 1:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Stock has had some oil finish applied, but that’s less of a concern than parts replacement during post-war refurbishments–& few M1 rifles or carbines escaped return to arsenals for overhaul some time in their histories.  I see only one acceptance cartouche, sanded down, which is a good sign.  But it takes a real US military expert like Big Larry to pick out any possible parts replacements.  Still, with the WW II sling, I think $1500 is well under current retail.  (Wish I could forget when you could buy them by the barrel for few hundred!)

Avatar
Big Larry
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2550
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
September 6, 2024 - 3:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Yeah, back in the 60’s they were $20 from the DCM. I have been out of US militaria for several years now. I just gave a 1943 Inland to a friend, unaltered, I had turned down a couple offers of $3,500 for. I still have an original M1A1 Paratrooper that is going to my Grandson. I would need my book to asses this rifle. Book is gone too. Good luck with this carbine. Big Larry

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5818
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
September 6, 2024 - 6:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

This is a relatively early carbine.  First batch of Winchester serial numbers was 1,000,000 to 1,349,999.  I’ll have to look up the manufacture date.  The only thing I see negative about the carbine is that the stock has been sanded and refinished.  You can see some of the sanded ordinance wheel cartouche.  This one may have had a WRA/GHD cartouche too? The rear sight is early.  The upper hand guard is early and has only 2 holes as apposed to the later 4 holes.  What I can see of the sling it looks correct.  You can see the crimping on the metal tip.  Post war did not look like this.  They were not crimped.  Take a look on the oiler and see if it has a letter stamped on it.  Sometimes the oiler and magazine were supplied by the same contractor.

 

Edit:  I looked through the 4 books I have on the carbine and none of them have serial number lists?

Avatar
cj57
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 419
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
September 7, 2024 - 1:20 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

That’s a nice early one, as stated above, the wood is refinished, no Arsenal rebuild marks. Most carbines were rebuilt after the war and again if it saw service in Korea, a bunch were converted to M2 and have the updated potbelly stocks to withstand full auto. I think 1500 is a good price, I would grab it

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 92
Member Since:
February 26, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
September 7, 2024 - 2:49 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Chuck said
Take a look on the oiler and see if it has a letter stamped on it.  Sometimes the oiler and magazine were supplied by the same contractor.

 

  

IMG_1856.jpeg

Here’s a pic of the marking on the oiler.  

Anyone know where I can find the manufacture date?

Thanks everyone for the replies.

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

IMG_0767.jpeg

Avatar
cj57
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 419
Member Since:
November 9, 2008
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
September 7, 2024 - 2:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The early ones should have a barrel date. The production figures in Larry Ruth’s book “War Baby” puts it in July 1943

Avatar
Rick Hill
Oregon
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 532
Member Since:
September 29, 1993
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
September 7, 2024 - 3:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

George:

Just Google it – It is a Winchester mark.

“Oiler Markings

Most post WWII Oilers were not marked.

International Silver Co. Made Oilers for the Prime M1 Carbine Contractors and marked them individually for each Contractor.

Inland Marked: II

Winchester Marked: SW, IW”

WACA Life Benefactor Member

NRA Life Member

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 92
Member Since:
February 26, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
September 7, 2024 - 5:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Rick Hill said
George:

Just Google it – It is a Winchester mark.

“Oiler Markings

Most post WWII Oilers were not marked.

International Silver Co. Made Oilers for the Prime M1 Carbine Contractors and marked them individually for each Contractor.

Inland Marked: II

Winchester Marked: SW, IW”

  

Thanks Rick & Others!

Here are a couple of more random pics.  By the way, I told him I’ll take it.

 

IMG_1859.jpegIMG_1858.jpegIMG_1857.jpeg

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

IMG_0767.jpeg

Avatar
rwsem
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 342
Member Since:
January 7, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
September 7, 2024 - 10:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

From what my novice eye picks up:

SN is a block of Winchester’s (1,000,000-1,349,999 May- Sep 1942) between Inland and Underwood.

Type 1 rear sight 150/300 yards

Most likely a type II bolt but would need to see under the extractor

Type I Winchester front sight: unmarked and ground flat or slightly lower behind sight blade

Type 1A Barrel Band (wider sling swivel than type 1)

Type II safety implemented early ’43 (uncheckered to save costs)

Type II Magazine catch introduced in early ’44

Type II Winchester stock (oval oiler cut out & W marked in the sling cutout)

Early Winchester butt plate

Technically, the glass is always full; half liquid, half air....

WACA #10293

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 92
Member Since:
February 26, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
September 7, 2024 - 11:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

rwsem said
From what my novice eye picks up:

SN is a block of Winchester’s (1,000,000-1,349,999 May- Sep 1942) between Inland and Underwood.

Type 1 rear sight 150/300 yards

Most likely a type II bolt but would need to see under the extractor

Type I Winchester front sight: unmarked and ground flat or slightly lower behind sight blade

Type 1A Barrel Band (wider sling swivel than type 1)

Type II safety implemented early ’43 (uncheckered to save costs)

Type II Magazine catch introduced in early ’44

Type II Winchester stock (oval oiler cut out & W marked in the sling cutout)

Early Winchester butt plate

  

Thanks!

I’m not sure what any of the Type 1, type II, type 1A stuff means in regard to this carbine.  Like I said, I don’t know much about military stuff.  The only other thing that I’ve owned was an 1896 KRAG Carbine, and I traded it for 3 Winchesters 😂

I get the feeling that this carbine is largely correct, and that I made a decent purchase.  That makes me happy because I’ve bought a few Ooops guns over the years for sure!

IMG_0767.jpeg

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5818
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
September 8, 2024 - 3:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

George, I had Craig Riesch, co author with Joe Poyer on a Carbine book, look at the pictures.  He said the barrelled action and upper hand guard are earlier than the stock.  This stock should not have the WRA/GHD cartouche.  Like Ronald said the mag release is later than the barreled action. The front barrel band may be newer.   I can’t tell if the sling is early or late?  What I call the buckle is thinner than the later ones.  

The different Types designate part changes.  So earliest guns would have Type I parts and as parts were changed throughout production the designation would change.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 92
Member Since:
February 26, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
September 9, 2024 - 12:20 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thanks for the info Chuck!

 

For those who are interested, here’s the KRAG Carbine that I had.  I bought it from my next door neighbor. His grandfather owned it, and he served in 34th Michigan Infantry Co. M in the Spanish American war, as well as other campaigns.  He was a career soldier for sure.  The guy that I traded with seemed really excited to get the carbine.  Here’s a few pics of the gun and the soldier.

 

IMG_9835.jpegIMG_9834.jpegIMG_9832.jpegIMG_9830.jpegIMG_9827.jpegIMG_9826.jpegIMG_9825.jpegIMG_9824.jpegIMG_9823.jpegIMG_9822.jpegIMG_9819.jpeg

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

IMG_0767.jpeg

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5818
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
September 9, 2024 - 4:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Very cool stuff. 

Avatar
Jeremy P
The Great State
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 898
Member Since:
April 30, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
September 9, 2024 - 4:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

That’s a nice M1, $1500 is a good price, if not under a little, but I know you already have it anyways, but well done! That’s a nice Krag too, especially with the provenance to go with it, very cool. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 92
Member Since:
February 26, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
September 9, 2024 - 11:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Thanks Chuck & Jeremy,

I traded the KRAG for 3 of the rifles in this lot…. He was happy, and I was happy also….

IMG_0683.jpeg

From the top: #2…#4….#5…

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

IMG_0767.jpeg

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6412
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
September 10, 2024 - 2:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

[email protected] said
Thanks Chuck & Jeremy,

I traded the KRAG for 3 of the rifles in this lot…. He was happy, and I was happy also….

IMG_0683.jpeg

From the top: #2…#4….#5…

  

Rather impressive stable of rimfires, George! Nicely done and thanks for posting the pics!

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Jeremy P
The Great State
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 898
Member Since:
April 30, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
19
September 10, 2024 - 4:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

If you traded one Krag for three of what’s in that pic, you did extra well. Those slide actions are NICE. Laugh

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 92
Member Since:
February 26, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
September 10, 2024 - 6:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Jeremy P said
If you traded one Krag for three of what’s in that pic, you did extra well. Those slide actions are NICE. Laugh

  

I did….. He wanted the Krag real bad!

 

I guess it’s kind of a rare variant carbine being an 1896 that’s actually stamped 1895….and the pictures don’t really do it justice.  The bluing on the barrel was high condition.

Plus the connection to the soldier.
 I did contact the Springfield Research Service back when I got it maybe 10 years ago, and they could not tie the gun to actual service, but I think their database like others are a constant work in progress.

IMG_0767.jpeg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bill Hockett, pdog72, mark minnillo, TR, 86Win, oldcrankyyankee, SureShot
Guest(s) 231
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6412
Chuck: 5818
steve004: 5175
1873man: 4701
deerhunter: 2696
Big Larry: 2550
twobit: 2495
mrcvs: 2196
Maverick: 2034
Newest Members:
Wheelies
Tburk2012
G.H. KITCHENS
longleke
js2inc
Timmy
Popsguns
Ernie Dyess
Noah Hutchens
clayboy702003
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14735
Posts: 131773

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9996
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation