January 8, 2025
OfflineThe 25-20 92 I did the stock work on and the 25-35 94. Finally got time and decent enough weather to get the barrels hot. Had to adjust the sight on the 92. They both shoot to point of aim now, even if I don’t. I need to learn more about the buckhorn sights of the 94. The carbine sight of the 92 I’m good with.

November 7, 2015
OfflineNice! Been getting any rain?
No shooting here today, would have to duct tape the rifles to the concrete bench, a folding table would have dumped everything and led a merry chase.
Mike
January 8, 2025
OfflineTXGunNut said
Nice! Been getting any rain? No shooting here today, would have to duct tape the rifles to the concrete bench, a folding table would have dumped everything and led a merry chase.
Mike
Yes, the rain has been coming regularly. The pasture is going yield some good round bales. It’s a little windy here. Thankfully not so bad when I was shooting. The 17 hmr I was sighting in drifted about 3 inches at 120yds with a 5-10 mph crosswind. At 35 yds I was shooting the numbers on the target.
January 20, 2023
OfflineAdam, both those Winchesters are a pleasure to look at. Natural light illuminates detail like nothing else. I’m sure an expert could pick the results apart for some reason or another but both rifles look like they’ve weathered years of use in good hands and are still ready for more.
About the buckhorn sight. I’ve listened patiently to condescending explanations that you use it like an aperture sight and just look through it and put the bead on the target. In other words, the eye will center itself in the brightest part of a semicircle.
Bravo Sierra. I don’t believe it. For one thing, it isn’t close enough to the eye and, more importantly, light will enter asymetrically. Tang sights and Lyman 21/38 receiver sights were the marksman’s preference for a reason, even for snapshooting.
Original a full buckhorn may be but so was the chamber pot. Leave it in or sell it to a sight collector. Install a Lyman 1a and whatever higher front sight that requires, if you want a “usin’ gun.” Your eyes will thank you.
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.
January 8, 2025
OfflineZebulon said
Adam, both those Winchesters are a pleasure to look at. Natural light illuminates detail like nothing else. I’m sure an expert could pick the results apart for some reason or another but both rifles look like they’ve weathered years of use in good hands and are still ready for more.
About the buckhorn sight. I’ve listened patiently to condescending explanations that you use it like an aperture sight and just look through it and put the bead on the target. In other words, the eye will center itself in the brightest part of a semicircle.
Bravo Sierra. I don’t believe it. For one thing, it isn’t close enough to the eye and, more importantly, light will enter asymetrically. Tang sights and Lyman 21/38 receiver sights were the marksman’s preference for a reason, even for snapshooting.
Original a full buckhorn may be but so was the chamber pot. Leave it in or sell it to a sight collector. Install a Lyman 1a and whatever higher front sight that requires, if you want a “usin’ gun.” Your eyes will thank you.
That makes a lot of sense. Trying to set the post in the notch I was still moving 2” vertically but was dead on for windage. I have an 1885 45-70 Uberti. It has a full buckhorn. I have been thinking about getting a tang sight for it.
January 20, 2023
OfflineBarrel-mounted rear sights require too much of a middle-aged human eye. A young shooter can manage aligning rear sight, front sight, and target fairly well but that ability fades rapidly with age.
There is a reason why our armed services adopted the aperture sight – once learned, everybody shoots better with it.
For the sake of authenticity, I can tolerate a tang peep, although I dislike the absence of micrometer adjustments and lack of any azimuth adjustment on most of them.
When I got my 1950 Model 70 Supergrade Decades ago, it came with a Lyman 48 WJS and, as I learned to use it effectively, it was like showing fire to a caveman. By changing out the aperture as lighting conditions varied, I realized I wasn’t giving up all that much to a 4X scope in most hunting situations.
We were discussing the Winchester Model 71. Collectors adore WRACO’S 98A bolt peep sight, which has fairly rough adjustments – loosen a set screw, slide the aperture up or down, tighten the set screw. My 1949 Model 71 wears a Redfield 80-FT with full quarter minute click micrometer knobs for both windage and elevation. I would not trade it.(The Redfield sight could be special ordered for the 71 until the Lyman 56W became standard and superseded the 98A, so a Redfield 70 or 80 looks at home.)
If you have not tried a Lyman 56A or a Redfield 70E on a Winchester 94, consider it before you settle on a tang peep. It would require tapping the left receiver wall, depending on the vintage of the gun. Neither receiver sight coded for the Model 94 is rare. The 56 would be more expensive. The steel 66 is just as good, by the way. One reason I like them so much is they are lightning fast and don’t interfere with my shooting hand’s grip.
If I can find it, I’ll attach a photo of two 1886 rifles, one with Redfield 70 and the other with a Redfield 80. Both with hunter knobs.
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.
January 20, 2023
OfflineHere is the 80
8
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.
January 8, 2025
OfflineThanks Bill. The 94 is D&T so I’ll start looking. I did ok on my close target. I didn’t think I was hitting the steel plate at 125 yds. One of my last shots I thought I heard a faint echo. It could have been that the 25-35 is fast enough that the muzzle blast covered the the round hitting the plate and light enough not to have a big report. Maybe this weekend I’ll be able to get it out again.
1 Guest(s)
Log In

