Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Black powder only sticker on new 1886 45-90 . Are the new 1886 models that weak?
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 52
Member Since:
September 3, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 21, 2026 - 1:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Local shop has a new 1886 45-90. It has warning on barrel “black powder only”. Is the 45-90 version that weak that it can’t shoot smokeless?

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 7134
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 21, 2026 - 2:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

There are no SAAMI specs for the 45-90 and you can’t load the 45-90 case to dangerous levels using BP. In my opinion the 45-90 is a poor choice for smokeless powder, it’s a blackpowder cartridge. It is very possible to load smokeless powder to a dangerous level in that cavernous 45-90 case. The gun’s manufacturer can’t be responsible for what ammo may be manufactured for that chambering so they specify something that they know will be safe. As far as manufacturers are concerned if you want to use smokeless in their 45-90 you’re on your own. That’s pretty much the same as any handloading proposition so it’s no big deal to the knowledgeable and conscientious handloader.

 

Mike 

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Zebulon
Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1773
Member Since:
January 20, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 21, 2026 - 4:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I have about the same gun you’re looking at with the same sticker. The sticker is a creation of Fabrique Nationale de Armes de Guerre’s legal department, populated by adults still afraid of the dark. 

As Mike says, 45-90 was never SAAMI qualified because it became obsolete before SAAMI existed. 

If you read the tedious little Limited Warranty cards that come in the current Winchester boxes with ALL their excellent guns, you will see you are SOL.if your modest handload detonates and blows fingers off. 

ECOUTE MOI! You are to shoot FACTORY STANDARD PRESSURE AMMUNITION only,  

MON DIEU! But there is no FACTORY 45-90 ammunition, nor is there any 45-90 STANDARD PRESSURE. What to do?.

Warrant the use of black powder ONLY because the morons can’t get enough into the case to blow the gun up. VOILA!

The barrels of the new Winchester Model 1886 rifles are made from the same .458 rifled barrel stock — excellent hard and tough chrome moly steel — whether rollmarked 45-70 or 45-90. The ONLY difference is the fractional amount deeper the chambering reamers cut. 

It is perfectly safe to shoot factory 45-70 ammunition in a new 45-90 chambered Winchester. The breech pressure and velocity will be marginally less because of the additional freebore — A WHOLE THREE TENTHS OF AN INCH.  Wow.

The 45-70 case is about 2.1 inches long. The 45-90 case is 2.4 inches long. 

The original 45-90 Winchesters were given a slow 1-in-32 twist to shoot 300 grain bullets as fast as possible. An “Express” cartridge. The new barrel stock is rifled 1-in-20 for both chamberings, the standard twist for the shorter cartridge. The new 45-90 Winchester shoots modern  300 grain bullets just fine and, unlike its predecessors, also can handle 400 grain and some 500 grain bullets well. 

For the record, you can get enough smokeless powder into the shorter 45-70 case to send shooter and rifle to the Moon in pieces, too. 

While some agonize about adding wads or fillers to the longer case to take up unused powder space,  most rational smokeless loadings of the 45-70 do not completely fill the case, without adverse result. Treat the new 45-90 Winchester like a 45-70 and be happy. 

- Bill 

 

WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist

"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 52
Member Since:
September 3, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 21, 2026 - 6:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thanks for responding. I was pretty sure it was a lawyer thing. I just happen to have 100 45-90 cases and a 3 die set to load them. I have a 1953 Lyman reloading handbook number 39 that has ample 45-90 load info. Yup, called the shop and bought the 1886. Not crazy about the tang safety or the rebound hammer but I got used to that on my 94 38-55. Could not find an original 1886 with condition that was affordable . Never get one of those past the wife!

Avatar
Zebulon
Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1773
Member Since:
January 20, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 21, 2026 - 7:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Like you, I wouldn’t die young in the absence of rebounding hammer lockwork. 

However, I actually.like the almost invisible tang safety.

I like it when I have to unload the magazine by jacking multiple rounds through the action while being extra careful to avoid the trigger. 

I like it when handling the rifle on sandbags seated at a too low range bench. Levering a round in with a barrel heavy 9 pound rifle held up with my weak hand and turned sideways to avoid fouling the bag, is awkward. It leaves me with returning a heavy COCKED gun to the bag with my left hand, too. I like to do that with a cocked and LOCKED gun.

I like it when, still seated, I then shoulder the gun and take a firing hold with my.right hand,. Sliding the safety off with my thumb is easier than contorting my arthritic right wrist up and over to crank the hammer back. 

Those who think only a moron could fire a lever action while loading or unloading a full magazine by inadvertently pulling the trigger — have never hunted with a moron. I once did and received enlightenment at 4 AM when said moron dropped hammer on his Marlin’s loaded chamber and fired a 32 Special into the ground between my feet. 

- Bill 

 

WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist

"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5534
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
February 21, 2026 - 8:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Zebulon said
Like you, I wouldn’t die young in the absence of rebounding hammer lockwork. 
However, I actually.like the almost invisible tang safety.
I like it when I have to unload the magazine by jacking multiple rounds through the action while being extra careful to avoid the trigger. 
I like it when handling the rifle on sandbags seated at a too low range bench. Levering a round in with a barrel heavy 9 pound rifle held up with my weak hand and turned sideways to avoid fouling the bag, is awkward. It leaves me with returning a heavy COCKED gun to the bag with my left hand, too. I like to do that with a cocked and LOCKED gun.
I like it when, still seated, I then shoulder the gun and take a firing hold with my.right hand,. Sliding the safety off with my thumb is easier than contorting my arthritic right wrist up and over to crank the hammer back. 
Those who think only a moron could fire a lever action while loading or unloading a full magazine by inadvertently pulling the trigger — have never hunted with a moron. I once did and received enlightenment at 4 AM when said moron dropped hammer on his Marlin’s loaded chamber and fired a 32 Special into the ground between my feet. 
  

I’ve been thinking about this factor recently.  I was watching a couple videos where the the more modern lever rifles with either a thumb tang safety or a push button safety on the receiver sides were villainized to be unsafe as compared to the traditional half-cock hammer safeties.  Visual demonstrations were even shown to demonstrate how unsafe they were.  However, there was absolutely no mention of how it goes when the rifle is being unloaded.  I’ve hunted with lever guns a lot and a major annoyance is unloading the rifle.  Jacking the cartridges through the action and then trying to find them in the snow, in brown grass and leaves, in the dark and so on is a major pain (and if you’re hunting with a ’92 rifle with a full magazine filled full – you’re looking for a lot of cartridges).  On top of all this, every time you are working the lever, the gun is fully cocked and ready to fire.  I’ve heard more than one story about a rifle being accidently discharged during this procedure.  

By the way, unloading my Remington M08’s and M81’s was a similar procedure.

The first shotgun my Dad bought was a 1897 Winchester and he bought that before I was born.  At a young age I was impressed with the two buttons on the receiver that allowed easy and quick unloading of the entire magazine.

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6478
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
February 22, 2026 - 12:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Just remember, heavier than standard weight bullets will cause more pressure.  I used 3 different powders and 3 different charges to get to around 1,500 fps with a 300 gr. bullet.  The heaviest charge was 43 grains and the other two were 24 and 31 grs.  Different powders cause different pressures. 

Avatar
Zebulon
Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1773
Member Since:
January 20, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
February 22, 2026 - 2:12 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Chuck said
Just remember, heavier than standard weight bullets will cause more pressure.  I used 3 different powders and 3 different charges to get to around 1,500 fps with a 300 gr. bullet.  The heaviest charge was 43 grains and the other two were 24 and 31 grs.  Different powders cause different pressures. 
  

Absolutely. I think your post goes on the 1895 ’06 guy’s thread. But you are exactly right. And it is breech pressure that opens.headspace, not muzzle velocity.

- Bill 

 

WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist

"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.

Avatar
Zebulon
Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1773
Member Since:
January 20, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
February 22, 2026 - 2:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Steve,  I’ve owned a Model 1894 Marlin with push button hammer block and thought it was, at worst, unsightly and awkward. However, the rifle was for my young son to use and I was grateful for it  when he needed to unload a magazine of .357 magnum pistol rounds. As I recall, there was a half-cock position on the sear and we used that instead, otherwise. 

The Winchester tang safety is much better, so well designed as to be unobtrusive and I personally think it is a really useful device. You pays your money and you takes your choice but some people would complain about being hung with a new rope. 

- Bill 

 

WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist

"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5534
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
February 22, 2026 - 1:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

[email protected] said
Local shop has a new 1886 45-90. It has warning on barrel “black powder only”. Is the 45-90 version that weak that it can’t shoot smokeless?
  

It surprised me when I first read this and it didn’t make immediate sense. I was thinking modern steel, strong M1886 action design… what could the problem be?  After reading the comments I better understand.  

It reminded me of the Marlin Model 1893 “B” grade I had in .32-40 – the barrel was marked, “for black powder only.”  This was interesting as Marlin was making M1893’s (in .32-40) as the same time this rifle was made – and they were marked for smokeless powder.  I understand the difference was in the barrel steel.

Edit:  I’m also reminded of an early Savage M1899 I had in .38-55.  The barrel was marked, “high pressure powder.”

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6478
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
February 22, 2026 - 5:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Zebulon said

Chuck said
Just remember, heavier than standard weight bullets will cause more pressure.  I used 3 different powders and 3 different charges to get to around 1,500 fps with a 300 gr. bullet.  The heaviest charge was 43 grains and the other two were 24 and 31 grs.  Different powders cause different pressures. 
  

Absolutely. I think your post goes on the 1895 ’06 guy’s thread. But you are exactly right. And it is breech pressure that opens.headspace, not muzzle velocity.
  

No, I was talking about the loads I use for my 45-90’s. 

Avatar
Maverick
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2166
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
February 22, 2026 - 6:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

For historical context. In January 1923 Winchester stopped loading the 45-90 W.H.V. (Winchester High Velocity) cartridge. The factory loaded it with 37.8 grains of #1 SharpShooter Smokeless powder made by the Laflin & Rand powder company. The bullet was a 300 grain Soft Point bullet.

Avatar
Zebulon
Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1773
Member Since:
January 20, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
February 23, 2026 - 2:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Thanks, Mav.  

Now that I have you 45-90.shooters together,  i’m.going to take a little excursion and ask how you deal with healthy 45-90 loads and steel crescent buttplates. 

I have a Miroku Winchester 1886 45-90 Sporting Rifle built to reproduce the disappearing comb, dropped style of the original stock, including a steel rifle buttplate. Getting a cheek weld on the comb while taking a stance that puts the butt squarely in my shoulder pocket, is the only way I can shoot it. 

I’ve tried putting the buttplate around my bicep and shooting across my chest like the muzzle loader commandos lecture. But when I hold the rifle that way,  the comb is so far away from my face I can’t get behind the sights. I’m 6’2″ but wear a 34″ sleeve and think that is the problem. 

So I’m considering a lace on pad with cheek rest and filling in the concave buttplate with a radiused piece of cross-linked foam or softwood. The LOP now is barely 13″and i can shoot a 14″ stock. This would essentially turn the butt into a padded shotgun style. 

TXgunNut and I tried my 45/70 86 ELW at the range a couple of days ago. With factory Remington 400 grain CoreLokt at 1600 fs, the 7.75 lb rifle lets you kmow when you touch it off but with shotgun butt and Mike’s magnum PAST shoulder pad, it was impressive but not painful. If I could replicate that experience in the 9 pound 45-90, it would be useful. 

- Bill 

 

WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist

"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 7134
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
February 23, 2026 - 3:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bill-

My limited experience with the 45-90 is with a somewhat heavier C. Sharps rifle, BP and bullet weights 500grs and over so it’s probably not useful. I think the 45-90 simply doesn’t have the violent recoil of some of today’s high velocity thumpers. It’s more of a shove than a punch, IMHO. If I want to knock myself silly I have an M-word around here with “modern” 45-70 loads that certainly check that box for me. 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6478
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
February 23, 2026 - 5:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I don’t think the 45-90 with the 300 grain bullets kick much at all.  Both of my 45-90’s have crescent butts.  Just make sure the butt is not on your collar bone.  The 45-70 with the 400 to 600 grains bullets kick like a mule.  As does my 95 in 35 with a shotgun butt.  Many years ago I bought a PAST recoil pad just for the 45-70 and 35 Win. 

Avatar
Zebulon
Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1773
Member Since:
January 20, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
February 24, 2026 - 12:56 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

So you guys are saying make some 300 grain loads up to yield original blackpowder velocities and try them before worrying about alleviating what may be tolerable recoil? 

As long as those don’t approach the foot pounds the Remingon 400 grain factory stuff delivered, I’ll try it. 

And thanks to Maverick for educating me on Winchester’s “WHV” label. 

- Bill 

 

WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist

"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 7134
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
February 24, 2026 - 3:40 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Zebulon said
So you guys are saying make some 300 grain loads up to yield original blackpowder velocities and try them before worrying about alleviating what may be tolerable recoil? 
As long as those don’t approach the foot pounds the Remingon 400 grain factory stuff delivered, I’ll try it. 
And thanks to Maverick for educating me on Winchester’s “WHV” label. 
  

Bill-

Actually a prudent smokeless load could very well be lower velocity than the original BP loads. In my experience optimal velocity with acceptable pressures is best accomplished with BP. I never had any luck with 45-90 express loads using smokeless but I had a less-than-optimal test mule and an unabashed bias towards BP in a BP cartridge. Reckon I should pour you a few Gould bullets?

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
426crown
Taos NM
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 412
Member Since:
October 29, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
February 24, 2026 - 2:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I load 45-90-300 lead  with 5744 37 grains, this is the low end range I got from Hogdon. Anyone see an issue? Thank you Bill

Avatar
Zebulon
Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1773
Member Since:
January 20, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
19
February 24, 2026 - 11:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Mike – if Gould bullets are .458 or .459,  have crimping grooves in the right place for the 45-90, and come out anywhere near 300 to 330 grains, I’d love to have a few to try. Locally, all I’ve been able to lay hands on are 405 gas checked. As you know, my 45-90 is a new one and the barrel has nothing to snag lead, which is a good start. As long as I can hit a coffee can lid at 100 yards, it will be good enough for me and the hog de jure. To quote the late Jack O’Connor, he would “join his ancestors with commendable rapidity.” 

Taos Bill – 5744 is supposed to be the go-to powder for the 45-90.  Mike has given me a can of it, which I propose to use and, from all I’ve been able to read so far, 37 grains of the stuff for the 300-330 bullets is a reasonable load. How does it treat your shoulder? Mine has seen 81 Winters and is arthritic. 

Texas Bill 

- Bill 

 

WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist

"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6478
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
February 25, 2026 - 5:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Zebulon said
Mike – if Gould bullets are .458 or .459,  have crimping grooves in the right place for the 45-90, and come out anywhere near 300 to 330 grains, I’d love to have a few to try. Locally, all I’ve been able to lay hands on are 405 gas checked. As you know, my 45-90 is a new one and the barrel has nothing to snag lead, which is a good start. As long as I can hit a coffee can lid at 100 yards, it will be good enough for me and the hog de jure. To quote the late Jack O’Connor, he would “join his ancestors with commendable rapidity.” 
Taos Bill – 5744 is supposed to be the go-to powder for the 45-90.  Mike has given me a can of it, which I propose to use and, from all I’ve been able to read so far, 37 grains of the stuff for the 300-330 bullets is a reasonable load. How does it treat your shoulder? Mine has seen 81 Winters and is arthritic. 
Texas Bill 
  

Mike Venturino used 30 grains of 5744 to get around 1342 to 1376 FPS.

I have used 3031, 4198 and 4759 to get 1500 to 1550 FPS.  With a 300 gr bullet.  The 3031 got the worse ES/SD. 

You don’t need a groove to crimp.  Do it where it is best for your groups. Some bullets don’t even have a crimp groove. 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: Jeremy Scott., Anthony, oldcrankyyankee, Blue Ridge Parson, MNwin
Guest(s) 279
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7134
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6478
steve004: 5534
1873man: 4852
deerhunter: 2863
twobit: 2634
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2368
Maverick: 2166
Newest Members:
Texan
mattk71
RCdeck
horne1956
DonDavis
Kc145Driver
Martin
ALongstreet
44 bulldog
kennet
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15598
Posts: 141508

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10506
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation