I have both of them, the external magazine & tubular magazine model. But one thing has puzzled me for years. Whose idea was it to put the charging handle on the left hand side. There is bound to be a good story here. Maybe a brainstorm after a two martini lunch? Very curious.
Who knows? Possibly a work around from a patent infringement of another maker or design.
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
I’ve only had one of the two Model 77 styles, the tubular feed version, on which the thinking behind placement of the charging handle is less apparent.
Based on my recollection of ads I saw when the Model 77 was introduced, the box magazine style was by far the most heavily promoted by Winchester. At the time, post-Korean War, Winchester was very much concerned with shedding its “old fashioned” image and promoting a “streamlined” look. The newly introduced Models 88, 55, 77, and 50 exemplified that look. A tubular magazine was “old fashioned” and detachable box magazines were cool and semi-military. The box magazine version of the 77 was sleeker and more”modern”. [If you doubt this, take a look at what Detroit was doing at the time.]
Also please to note Winchester was not notably – strike that — AT ALL concerned about left handed customers. Go buy a pump. Why does that attitude matter?
Because placing the charging handle on the left side of the gun:
- allows the shooter to keep his shooting hand in place on the pistol grip while changing magazines and operating the charging handle with his “off” hand;
- makes the most photographed illustrations of the gun appear less cluttered and even more sleek and cool and modern.
To sum up, in 1955:
STREAMLINED = GOOD. OLD FASHIONED = LOSER STREET
To quote Elmer Keith, “Hell, I was THERE!”
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.
I apologize for being slow in responding, I took the long route home from the Greeley show.
All of the previous Winchester semi-auto models such as the 1903, 63, 74, etc. ALL ejected on the right side of the receiver, and the 77 design is the same. The difference being in that the charging rod for the 1903 and 63 was at the FRONT of the receiver and the 74 was at the REAR of the receiver on the right side so as to clear the ejection port. The 77 charging handle (with a sheet-metal body/sides) had to have the knob located on the LEFT side or it would have obscured the ejection port during cycling.
Personally, I like it there as it lets me keep my strong hand on the pistol grip instead of my off hand on the forearm while charging the rifle.
Don’t get me started on the Buck Rogers plastic trigger guards…….
Best Regards,
WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire
JWA said
I apologize for being slow in responding, I took the long route home from the Greeley show.All of the previous Winchester semi-auto models such as the 1903, 63, 74, etc. ALL ejected on the right side of the receiver, and the 77 design is the same. The difference being in that the charging rod for the 1903 and 63 was at the FRONT of the receiver and the 74 was at the REAR of the receiver on the right side so as to clear the ejection port. The 77 charging handle (with a sheet-metal body/sides) had to have the knob located on the LEFT side or it would have obscured the ejection port during cycling.
Personally, I like it there as it lets me keep my strong hand on the pistol grip instead of my off hand on the forearm while charging the rifle.
Don’t get me started on the Buck Rogers plastic trigger guards…….
Best Regards,
Jeff, I understand your point. A charging rod centered through the forearm would preclude an underbarrel tube magazine. However, I don’t think there were, at that time, patent restrictions against placing a non-reciprocating charging knob on the bolt itself, in the manner of the contemporaneous Model 50 shotgun. The Model 03/05/07/10 charging rod location was less a design choice than a necessity to avoid Browning’s patent, which had expired.
From that, I would opine the design decision – to place the charging knob on the left and forward – was a styling choice that necessitated an attached operating rod to reach the bolt, rather than the other way round.
I’m not an engineer but that’s what it looks like to me. I’m prepared to be educated otherwise.
Bill
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.
I guess if we want to reverse-engineer it, the first question is what side do you WANT the operating rod handle on? Which makes more sense, left or right, and why?
My preference is the left side, as designed, for the reason I previously stated. I need some context as to why the “right” side is the preferred or “correct” side as I see no design benefit in it. I have a few dozen 77’s and until the question was posed never thought a negative thought about the location of the charging handle.
Just curious….
Best Regards,
WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire
Jeff, That’s because you (presumably) and I are both right-handed. For us, the M77 operating handle on the left is a real improvement over having to do a “border shift” to change magazines or clear a mis-feed or a stovepipe.
I think it was a conscious choice made in the design department to improve the handling characteristics of the gun while rendering its appearance more stylish. Which it did.
It may be sacrilegious to say it here, but I think the most stylish and handsome Winchesters to come out of New Haven were those designed in the Fifties, in particular the Models 77, 88, 100, and — a particular favorite of mine — the Model 59. I didn’t say “mechanically perfect”, “historically important”, and certainly not “commercially successful” but when you look at them they make you happy!
I would have to throw in the Models 42 and 61 even though they were products designed in an earlier era. And the Model 21 Skeet Gun with straight grip…
Bill
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.
I am actually left-handed but right eye dominate but I see your point as I shoot right-handed.
It began when I started playing little league baseball and needed a new glove. Dad took me down to the 5 and dime store in our small town where they had a grand total of 4 gloves to choose from, including one for those of us guys throwing left-handed. Unfortunately, the price for the “lefty” glove was 3 times the price of the other gloves so Dad handed me a new “righty” glove and said congratulations, you now throw right-handed (and I have ever since). I write and eat left-handed but that is about it anymore. I grew up in the Ozarks and my Granny always said I “owed the Devil a day’s work” for being left handed. So maybe I only owe a half-day now?
Best Regards,
WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire
Jeff, Understood.. .Both my sons are left eye dominant and right-handed. The younger one was ambidextrous until.about age five. They both shoot right handed and close their left eye.
I bought a virtually new tube feed M77 some years ago and could kick myself for selling it but was going through a stage of “Ive got too many” and somebody gave me a wad of bills for it.
Ive still got the new in the box steel Lyman aperture sight I was going to install. I think I hesitated because the receiver wasn’t factory d/td.
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.
I do have to say that while I am not a big fan of the 77 (it has some REALLY dumb design features like having to remove the barrel to clean it), it does have a few features that are useful like the bolt hold-open feature on later rifles and of course all of them were factory grooved for a tip-off scope. I have a SAKO groove-mounted receiver sight that works perfect on the 77 (and other rifles) with no modifications.
To be honest, I have 25-30 of them in my reference collection for a possible future article since there were so many manufacturing changes to that design but I don’t really shoot any of them since they are a PITA to clean, hard to reassemble and get the springs and c-clips in the right places and they get gunked-up fast.
I have bought several from owners who disassembled the rifle to clean it and could not get it back together or functioning properly after reassembly. There are 2 internal springs, almost identical but unrelated, that when swapped prevent the gun from functioning reliably. From an engineering standpoint that is a poor design.
Best Regards,
WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire
Jeff, you just reminded me of what I didn’t like about the otherwise estimable Model 100. It didn’t have a manual bolt release. The magazine would hold the bolt open when the last round was fired but you had to pull back on the operating handle while extracting the magazine. Awkward. A cheap jack way to avoid designing a manual bolt release.
Otherwise it was a nice rifle. Mine was a 308 and my 12 year old could shoot it comfortably.
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.
November 7, 2015

JWA said
I am actually left-handed but right eye dominate but I see your point as I shoot right-handed.It began when I started playing little league baseball and needed a new glove. Dad took me down to the 5 and dime store in our small town where they had a grand total of 4 gloves to choose from, including one for those of us guys throwing left-handed. Unfortunately, the price for the “lefty” glove was 3 times the price of the other gloves so Dad handed me a new “righty” glove and said congratulations, you now throw right-handed (and I have ever since). I write and eat left-handed but that is about it anymore. I grew up in the Ozarks and my Granny always said I “owed the Devil a day’s work” for being left handed. So maybe I only owe a half-day now?
Best Regards,
My dad was a lefty but for most things he was ambidextrous, like a lot of lefties. I can run a handgun, fork or paintbrush with either hand but can’t write legibly with either. Charging handles work well on either side of the receiver for me, I can reach over the top of the receiver with my off hand as easily as I can rack the slide on a pistol.
Mike
TXGunNut said
JWA said
I am actually left-handed but right eye dominate but I see your point as I shoot right-handed.
It began when I started playing little league baseball and needed a new glove. Dad took me down to the 5 and dime store in our small town where they had a grand total of 4 gloves to choose from, including one for those of us guys throwing left-handed. Unfortunately, the price for the “lefty” glove was 3 times the price of the other gloves so Dad handed me a new “righty” glove and said congratulations, you now throw right-handed (and I have ever since). I write and eat left-handed but that is about it anymore. I grew up in the Ozarks and my Granny always said I “owed the Devil a day’s work” for being left handed. So maybe I only owe a half-day now?
Best Regards,
My dad was a lefty but for most things he was ambidextrous, like a lot of lefties. I can run a handgun, fork or paintbrush with either hand but can’t write legibly with either. Charging handles work well on either side of the receiver for me, I can reach over the top of the receiver with my off hand as easily as I can rack the slide on a pistol.
Mike
I’m not ambidextrous but I was trained to shoot left handed too. Also to keep both eyes open. One eye on the target and the other on other stuff like wind flags and such. I shoot single shot target rifles and reach over and catch the case with my left hand. I can do it with my right hand as I pull the bolt back but not as well and some get passed me or get knocked back into the chamber.
1 Guest(s)
