Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester 75, Serial 42852, missing parts
Avatar
John D.
Star ID
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 190
Member Since:
March 3, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 30, 2026 - 5:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

A local gun club was selling their loaner rack rifles, and in a sea of Remington’s and Mossberg’s there was a Winchester 75….  so, it came home with me.  Smile

The gun is kind of a wreck and has been well used, but the price was right.  Is is missing the magazine and front globe sight, has the wrong butt-plate, and the stock desperately needs to be refinished. The gun and stock are otherwise sound, and there is a Redfield 75 mounted in the rear.

Serial number dates it to 1947.

I’ve been Googling for the magazine and butt-plate, and have a handle on that. But, I was wondering what the “correct” front sight would be….. there is a sight block in the front dovetail, so the missing globe sight would have been a clamp on one as opposed to a Lyman 17 type that fits into the barrel dovetail directly.  Any pointers on that?

Avatar
Blue Ridge Parson
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 356
Member Since:
June 1, 2023
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
January 30, 2026 - 6:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

A Lyman 77 front sight will clamp onto your front sight block. The Lyman 77 is nothing more than an easily removable Lyman 17 sight.

BRP

Avatar
Jim F in CT
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 31
Member Since:
December 13, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
January 30, 2026 - 6:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

If the buttplate is “wrong”, do you think the wood was cut back to fit the wrong plate?

Avatar
John D.
Star ID
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 190
Member Since:
March 3, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 30, 2026 - 6:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Jim F in CT said
If the buttplate is “wrong”, do you think the wood was cut back to fit the wrong plate?
  

The opposite…..  it is a metal butt-plate that is oversized relative to the wood.  The stock is in original condition, but the finish is very worn and battered.

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6334
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
January 30, 2026 - 6:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

John D. said

Jim F in CT said
If the buttplate is “wrong”, do you think the wood was cut back to fit the wrong plate?
  

The opposite…..  it is a metal butt-plate that is oversized relative to the wood.  The stock is in original condition, but the finish is very worn and battered.
  

Oversized butt plate does occur when the stock has been shortened.  Maybe not in your case.  I was looking at a 69A that had this problem. 

Avatar
JWA
Location: 32000' +
Admin
Forum Posts: 2682
Member Since:
July 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
January 30, 2026 - 7:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Using the Winchester Polishing Room Records, your serial number actually dates it to September, 1942.  The available 75 sight packages for that year were:

75 TARGET CATALOG SYMBOL YEARS USED + SIGHTS
G7501R1 1938-1945, Winchester 99A (front)
Winchester 84A Extension (rear)
G7505R late 1940-early 1941, (military contract) Winchester 93B (front) Lyman 57E (rear)
G7521R 1938-1942, No. 8 Telescope with crosshairs
(no other sights)
G7525R 1938 – end of production, No sights or telescope supplied
 
G7527R 1938-1945, Vaver 1175 (front)
Vaver 3875 (rear)
G7537R 1939-1947, Lyman 77 (front)
Lyman 58E (rear)
G7547R 1938-early 1942, Redfield 63 Globe (front)
Redfield 75HW (rear)

If your rear Redfield 75HW is original to the rifle then the front would have been the Redfield 63 Globe front sight.  However, with that late of a production date (September, 1942) it would have been VERY likely to have been produced as part of the wartime contract for US Government training rifles as a G7505R with the Lyman 57E rear and Winchester 93B front sight as Winchester had already halted the commercial production of the Model 75 by that time.  Many of those rifles were later sold as surplus from the Army by the Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) to gun clubs and other similar entities.  Many came with the sights missing and the stocks shortened for use by the Jr. ROTC and CMP affiliated school clubs.  Your rifle fits that description.

Pictures would help with your other questions.

Best Regards,

WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire

http://rimfirepublications.com/  

Avatar
John D.
Star ID
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 190
Member Since:
March 3, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
January 30, 2026 - 9:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

JWA,

Very informative, thanks!

I had pulled the rifle apart and completely detail cleaned it. You’re advising that it was built in 1942……  I think it was last cleaned in 1943. Laugh

Anyway, some pics below, to include the butt plate. I think you might be spot on about it being a possible ROTC Jr rifle – the sling rail slots shows clear evidence of being hand chiseled out towards the receiver to allow for a shorter sling length.

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

 

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Avatar
John D.
Star ID
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 190
Member Since:
March 3, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
February 2, 2026 - 6:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The rifle is completely apart now, and the stock has been stripped of all finish and will soon be ready for refinishing.  A replacement magazine is en route from Sarco, and I will be receiving a Redfield 63 front globe on Saturday to complete the rifle.

I still have to deal with the ill-fitting butt plate, and will have a machinist friend make a replacement sling rail that will fit the elongated sling rail slot.

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6983
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
February 3, 2026 - 9:51 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Looking foreword to seeing progress reports on this project, John. My “shooter” 75 Target has a custom stock with lengthened rail, among other “upgrades”. If your stock hasn’t been shortened perhaps you can find a correct replacement butt plate.

 

Mike 

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
John D.
Star ID
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 190
Member Since:
March 3, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
February 3, 2026 - 2:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

TXGunNut said
Looking foreword to seeing progress reports on this project, John. My “shooter” 75 Target has a custom stock with lengthened rail, among other “upgrades”. If your stock hasn’t been shortened perhaps you can find a correct replacement butt plate.
 
Mike 
  

GPC has repops, but that decision can wait. I can probably shape the existing one to fit as it is oversized. 

Avatar
Jeremy P
The Great State
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1073
Member Since:
April 30, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
February 4, 2026 - 2:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Let’s see the stock work in progress!

Avatar
John D.
Star ID
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 190
Member Since:
March 3, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
February 4, 2026 - 6:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Jeremy P said
Let’s see the stock work in progress!
  

OK.  Smile

Since this was a club gun, I was not too surprised to see the glass bedding in the channel.

The original finish was pretty scarred up and missing in the high contact points, so I stripped the entire stock down to bare wood.  I wanted to remove as little wood as possible, so I touched it up gently with 150 grit, and followed that with 220 grit to smooth it out. 

Right now, I have one coat of BLO and 2 coats of WATCO medium walnut Danish Oil finish on it.  I applied the BLO first, let it dry, and then followed up with the WATCO.  I let the second coat dry until it was almost complete but still a little bit tacky, and then knocked down the shine by gently rubbing it down with mineral spirits.  I like the satin look so far, but I will probably follow up with another coat or two after everything dries a bit more.

As stated earlier, the Redfield 63 globe site is on the way, as is the magazine. I was able to scribe and contour the butt plate to fit the butt-stock, so all that remains is to deal with the oversized sling/hand-stop rail groove.

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

 

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Avatar
Jeremy P
The Great State
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1073
Member Since:
April 30, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
February 4, 2026 - 6:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

That looks good, love the color.

Avatar
Anthony
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1369
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
February 4, 2026 - 7:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I am in agreement Jeremy,

As John D. is doing some nice restoration work here on an example that needs it to make a very nice presentable shooter. IMHO! Smile

 

Anthony

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: win4575, 426crown, tionesta1, John Lindly, Steven Gabrielli, Reddog, Zebulon, Blue Ridge Parson, Dave K, M64lvr, Bo Rich, MidwestCrisis
Guest(s) 1206
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6983
Chuck: 6334
steve004: 5436
1873man: 4816
deerhunter: 2822
twobit: 2605
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2318
Maverick: 2132
Newest Members:
Pennview
SCWayne
Merchant of the Old West
wjw
winfan
Ranger55
GeorgeJ
Rshell
Stevepala
Angelo Colletti
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15408
Posts: 139296

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10388
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation