Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 62 .22 Short with non-triangular loading port and serial 185XXX
Avatar
bryan fleck
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 31
Member Since:
October 10, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 15, 2022 - 3:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Gentlemen,

Everything I have read suggest that after 90,000, the model 62 became the model 62A.  A local gunstore is selling a 1946 production 62 that is barrel stamped “Model 62” and has a regular .22 short loading tube opening (not triangular like a gallery gun).  Question: Should I expect a 1946 gun to be stamped Model 62A and if not, would a stamped “.22 short” gun have a regular loading port.   The blueing looks original, however, in areas where one would expect wear, like the pump slide rails and the top of the bolt carrier, there is little; as well as no silvering of the edges.  I am wondering if someone would go to the trouble of replacing a barrel and tube thinking a .22 short gun would get mistaken for a rarer gun.  I have not checked to see if the bolt carrier is for a .22 short.  Thanks for thoughts.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12975
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 15, 2022 - 3:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

If the rifle in question was manufactured in 1946 as you suggest, it most definitely should have “62A” marked barrel on it. Do both serial numbers on the rifle match? In answer to your question about someone going to the trouble of swapping a barrel, the unfortunate answer is Yes. There are simply way too many dealers out there that will rebuild (fake) a Winchester with intent to cheat a buyer into paying a premium price for it.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
bryan fleck
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 31
Member Since:
October 10, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 15, 2022 - 11:33 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

  Yes both the receiver and the bottom tang have the same serial #183655.  the script on the barrel reads, ” Winchester -MODEL 62-”  second line “- 22 SHORT-” so maybe the barrel was replaced?   The gunstore does not have a range, not sure if they will demonstrate whether the carrier will handle 22 shorts…but it seems like that would tell the tale? The bottom and top tang have single screws  YOu don’t think a parts clean up would have produced an oddball?

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12975
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 15, 2022 - 11:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bryan,

The standard Model 62 and 62A carriers were specifically made to handle 22 Short, 22 Long, and 22 Long Rifle cartridges interchangeably, so cycling a 22 Short through the rifle in question is not going to tell you much.

While it is remotely possible that a parts clean-up Model 62 rifle barrel was used to assemble this specific rifle, the odds are greatly stacked against it.  The Model 62A was offered and manufactured in 22 Short only well before 1946.  If this rifle had been a pre-WW II model 62A, it would be much more likely to be a parts clean-up.  The serial number you mention was manufactured in the latter half of September 1946.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bill Hockett, sb, JWA, keith shaffer, Ponderer1234
Guest(s) 490
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6439
Chuck: 5856
steve004: 5209
1873man: 4702
deerhunter: 2709
Big Larry: 2553
twobit: 2504
mrcvs: 2210
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
Oldtimer52
parkerposy
rayhobbs
WebleyScott
Task1
1886
Jerome Stevens
Arkansas mike
Freeweb1991
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14802
Posts: 132442

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10042
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation