Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1890 opinions please!
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 9
Member Since:
March 24, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
August 16, 2018 - 2:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Gentlemen, I came across this 1890 on a forum and seller was nice enough to send over some pics as well as the serial number.

What struck me first was the bluing, the gun appears to be too dark for its age, but that could be lighting/camera. On closer inspection it appears some of the blueing is chipping off?. The next piece of the puzzle is that the barrel stamp and serial number are out by approximately 10 years?

The serial number is 467677, putting around 1911/12. The “made in the USA” barrel stamp didn’t come around until aprox. 1923. What I think the seller has is a pieced together re-blued 1890 22 wrf, I care because this would be a collection piece and not a shooter. 

I seek the council of higher powers!

 

Thanks

 

Kristjan winchester-1890-22-WRF-001.JPGImage Enlarger winchester-1890-22-WRF-003.JPGImage Enlargerwinchester-1890-22-WRF-004.JPGImage Enlarger

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6380
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
August 16, 2018 - 3:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

[email protected] said

I seek the council of higher powers!
  

Seems to me your powers of research & good sense have already answered the question! 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10845
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
August 16, 2018 - 3:51 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Definitely refinished, and rebarreled with a newer production barrel.  Not a “collector” piece.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2303
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
August 16, 2018 - 12:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Kristjan,

You have done a good job analyzing the rifle and have drawn the correct conclusion.  Definitely refinished, the sling stud attachment in the stock is not original, the butt stock has been sanded, and the barrel is not original.  

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 889
Member Since:
September 28, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
August 17, 2018 - 12:27 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Both front and rear sights are incorrect also.

 

Erin

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 9
Member Since:
March 24, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
August 17, 2018 - 7:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
Definitely refinished, and rebarreled with a newer production barrel.  Not a “collector” piece.

Bert  

That’s what I thought, thanks for the input, glad I asked first and didn’t role the dice.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 9
Member Since:
March 24, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
August 17, 2018 - 7:28 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Erin Grivicich said
Both front and rear sights are incorrect also.

 

Erin  

Very interesting, I didn’t even get that far to investigate the sights. Its really pays to invest in Winchester research materials.

Avatar
Northwestern Ontario
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 298
Member Since:
December 14, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
August 19, 2018 - 3:49 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Once again this just posting shows how valuable this forum is to us Winchester collectors. I also looked seriously at buying this gun and was awaiting photos to arrive in email. They did arrive tonight and they are of this same gun. Thanks to everyone who examined the photos and established that it is a refinished and rebarrelled gun. I probably would have bought it had it not been for this forum.

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5050
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
August 20, 2018 - 5:32 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I agree, Dave. The expert opinions and the recommendations for reference materials available here have helped me make several buying decisions. They’ve helped me identify sleepers and the occasional (and inevitable) bad buying decision. The number of “inaccurate” offerings never ceases to amaze me but very little gets past the experts that hang out here.

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 169
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6380
TXGunNut: 5050
Chuck: 4600
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4260
Big Larry: 2346
twobit: 2303
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12773
Posts: 111282

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1767
Members: 8860
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation