Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1890 opinions please!
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 9
Member Since:
March 24, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
August 16, 2018 - 2:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Gentlemen, I came across this 1890 on a forum and seller was nice enough to send over some pics as well as the serial number.

What struck me first was the bluing, the gun appears to be too dark for its age, but that could be lighting/camera. On closer inspection it appears some of the blueing is chipping off?. The next piece of the puzzle is that the barrel stamp and serial number are out by approximately 10 years?

The serial number is 467677, putting around 1911/12. The “made in the USA” barrel stamp didn’t come around until aprox. 1923. What I think the seller has is a pieced together re-blued 1890 22 wrf, I care because this would be a collection piece and not a shooter. 

I seek the council of higher powers!

 

Thanks

 

Kristjan winchester-1890-22-WRF-001.JPGImage Enlarger winchester-1890-22-WRF-003.JPGImage Enlargerwinchester-1890-22-WRF-004.JPGImage Enlarger

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
August 16, 2018 - 3:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

[email protected] said

I seek the council of higher powers!
  

Seems to me your powers of research & good sense have already answered the question! 

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12868
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
August 16, 2018 - 3:51 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Definitely refinished, and rebarreled with a newer production barrel.  Not a “collector” piece.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2493
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
August 16, 2018 - 12:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Kristjan,

You have done a good job analyzing the rifle and have drawn the correct conclusion.  Definitely refinished, the sling stud attachment in the stock is not original, the butt stock has been sanded, and the barrel is not original.  

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Erin Grivicich
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 941
Member Since:
September 28, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
August 17, 2018 - 12:27 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Both front and rear sights are incorrect also.

 

Erin

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 9
Member Since:
March 24, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
August 17, 2018 - 7:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said
Definitely refinished, and rebarreled with a newer production barrel.  Not a “collector” piece.

Bert  

That’s what I thought, thanks for the input, glad I asked first and didn’t role the dice.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 9
Member Since:
March 24, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
August 17, 2018 - 7:28 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Erin Grivicich said
Both front and rear sights are incorrect also.

 

Erin  

Very interesting, I didn’t even get that far to investigate the sights. Its really pays to invest in Winchester research materials.

Avatar
Dave K.
Northwestern Ontario
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 303
Member Since:
December 14, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
August 19, 2018 - 3:49 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Once again this just posting shows how valuable this forum is to us Winchester collectors. I also looked seriously at buying this gun and was awaiting photos to arrive in email. They did arrive tonight and they are of this same gun. Thanks to everyone who examined the photos and established that it is a refinished and rebarrelled gun. I probably would have bought it had it not been for this forum.

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6408
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
August 20, 2018 - 5:32 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I agree, Dave. The expert opinions and the recommendations for reference materials available here have helped me make several buying decisions. They’ve helped me identify sleepers and the occasional (and inevitable) bad buying decision. The number of “inaccurate” offerings never ceases to amaze me but very little gets past the experts that hang out here.

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: TR
Guest(s) 203
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6408
Chuck: 5809
steve004: 5173
1873man: 4698
deerhunter: 2694
Big Larry: 2549
twobit: 2493
mrcvs: 2194
Maverick: 2029
Newest Members:
ross
Model94-2025
R.E. Moore
sjGUESTEST
WindsurfAruba
cedar swamp savage
tradecraft
Weida78
Alby
Lambeau
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14714
Posts: 131639

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9982
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation