Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1099
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 2, 2020 - 9:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

  I just found, at a local gun show a beautiful 1885, ser#2736, 1886 manufacture in really nice cond. with lots of case color on the frame and lots of blue on the barrel. The fella’s had the gun for 50 years and is just now thinning out his collection. Any way I’ve never had much to do with ’85’s but I do know the sights are not correct, it has a Lyman globe front and a tang sight on the rear. I can see where it had a longer leaf sight, what are the proper sights for this gun.

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 2, 2020 - 11:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Henry,

The sights are usually related to the caliber and the frame type… neither of which did you mention.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4600
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 2, 2020 - 11:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I might pay more for these sights than the standard ones.  Front could be a Rocky Mountain, Knife Blade, Sporting Front or Winchester Express.  Rear would be Sporting Rear sight.  You need to letter the gun before buying more sights.  Bert can tell you how the tang sight should be marked.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1099
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 3, 2020 - 12:44 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I got interrupted earlier by company. O K here’s what I got; 30″ oct. bbl. 13/16″ across the flats at the muzzle, #2 ahead of for end  2 line address, and Cal. 32-40 at breach end, #2 under fore stock, circled vp and 32-40 under the hammer spring. a Lyman globe 5-g front site. A crude filler in the rear site slot. There is elevater wear on top to indicate there was a longer rear site on it at one time.  On the frame it is, thin side, case colored, squared on top, not round, set trigger,  with # 2 and #62 on top tang, #2 #62 and 1 and S on the lower tang, under the lever is -PAT.Oct. 7th 79- and ser# 2736. in script. Fine checkering on the hammer. Lyman D A tang site. No marks on the crescent butt plate, D. C. CLARKE on wood under butt plate. I need to get better educated on the ’85’s.

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6387
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 3, 2020 - 1:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

 

Henry Mero said
I got interrupted earlier by company. O K here’s what I got; 30″ oct. bbl. 13/16″ across the flats at the muzzle, #2 ahead of for end  2 line address, and Cal. 32-40 at breach end, #2 under fore stock, circled vp and 32-40 under the hammer spring. a Lyman globe 5-g front site. A crude filler in the rear site slot. There is elevater wear on top to indicate there was a longer rear site on it at one time.  On the frame it is, thin side, case colored, squared on top, not round, set trigger,  with # 2 and #62 on top tang, #2 #62 and 1 and S on the lower tang, under the lever is -PAT.Oct. 7th 79- and ser# 2736. in script. Fine checkering on the hammer. Lyman D A tang site. No marks on the crescent butt plate, D. C. CLARKE on wood under butt plate. I need to get better educated on the ’85’s.  

You let your company distract you from a new gun?

Anyway, both the front & tang sights are later additions.  Only a Cody letter will disclose (maybe!) the original sights; but the elevator wear speaks for itself.  But not a problem in my opinion–sight replacement then was as common as it is now, & the more serious the shooter, the more likely he was to experiment with different sight combinations.  

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4600
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
February 3, 2020 - 5:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I should have added in my earlier post that if the rear sight was a sporting site most likely so was the front.  I have a number of 85’s and 3 of them have something other than the sporting front sight even though they have the sporting rear sight. 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: freebird1968
Guest(s) 194
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6387
TXGunNut: 5055
Chuck: 4600
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2348
twobit: 2303
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12784
Posts: 111359

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8871
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation