Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model12
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
December 2, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 2, 2019 - 3:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I’ve got a 1929 model 12 

firstly there’s no indication of chamber length, is it possible it could only be 2 1/2? Also I’m stripping it down, how is the mag tube removed from pump handle? I’m assuming the spa er nut has to be removed before the tube will slide out?

thanks in advance 

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12890
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 2, 2019 - 3:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Why do you believe that it is a 1929 production Model 12? Which gauge is it?

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
December 2, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 2, 2019 - 3:19 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Serial number indicates 1929

its a 12 gauge 

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12890
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 2, 2019 - 3:39 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

[email protected] said
Serial number indicates 1929

its a 12 gauge   

12 Gauge Model 12s were never chambered for anything less than 2-¾” shells.  If the serial number is < 594590, it was manufactured before 1929.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Pigeongrade
Guest
Guests
5
December 2, 2019 - 4:27 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Model 12 Winchester numbers on line say 

589597 was 1929??

i dunno . Regardless as long as none were 2 1/2” I’m fine.

now how about removing that mag tube from the handle?

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
December 2, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
December 2, 2019 - 5:05 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

#589597….   2 other sites say 557851–600834 is  1929

this site says 1928

close enough I guess

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12890
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
December 3, 2019 - 4:39 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

[email protected] said
#589597….   2 other sites say 557851–600834 is  1929

this site says 1928

close enough I guess  

The information on the WACA website (here) is the accurate source, as it was derived directly from the factory records.  The information you can or will find on other websites is erroneous.  If you have doubts about what I am telling you, contact the CFM research office and purchase a factory letter.

Bert (WACA Historian)

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: keith shaffer, [email protected], 86Win, Blue Ridge Parson
Guest(s) 660
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6413
Chuck: 5820
steve004: 5177
1873man: 4701
deerhunter: 2696
Big Larry: 2550
twobit: 2497
mrcvs: 2196
Maverick: 2035
Newest Members:
Winchesterman
RonHSE
nmlittlebigman
Brewcrew602
Wheelies
Tburk2012
G.H. KITCHENS
longleke
js2inc
Timmy
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14740
Posts: 131819

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10000
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation