Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 1895 chamber issue
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2646
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
May 9, 2025 - 6:49 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I just took delivery of a beautiful model 1895 in caliber 30-40 Krag in about 90%+ condition, but I went to chamber a round and noticed there is some roughness/corrosion in the chamber and the cartridge will not fully chamber.  In fact, it gets stuck about 1/4″ out from the chamber.  Is this something that can be remedied or should I consider returning the rifle?  I already tried cleaning it as much as I can, but no change.  I have 3 days to let the seller know and tomorrow (5/9/25) is day number 3.  The rifle is in excellent condition (including the bore), but just has roughness in the chamber so I would really like to keep it if it’s a somewhat easy and inexpensive fix through a quality gunsmith since I plan on shooting it.  I’ve attached some photos below showing the chamber along with a 30-40 Krag round in as far as it will go before it gets stuck.  Thoughts and opinions appreciated!  I think I’ll PM Mark Douglas with this issue as well.

Thanks,

Don

P1100193.JPGImage EnlargerP1100194.JPGImage EnlargerP1100195.JPGImage EnlargerP1100196.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 57
Member Since:
March 23, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
May 9, 2025 - 7:05 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Three thoughts come to mind:

1. Are you using a factory cartridge to test it?  A reloaded cartridge might not be sized fully at the base, although it may fit in another firearm with a more generous chamber. 

2.  Did you use a bore scope to check the chamber on the off chance that an old cartridge neck is lodged in there?  At least you could examine the chamber in more detail. 

3. Have you notified the seller of the issue and asked for a little more time to troubleshoot the problem?

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12662
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
May 9, 2025 - 7:09 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Don,

I certainly would not accept that rifle as is.  Contacting Mark is a good idea, but I would first contact the seller to see what his thoughts are.  If Mark tells you he can fix it, I would negotiate with seller for a reduced price.  If the seller is not willing to negotiate, send it back for a full refund, and post the serial number of the gun so that other WACA members are aware of the issues with that specific gun.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2646
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 9, 2025 - 7:29 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

dimrod said
Three thoughts come to mind:

1. Are you using a factory cartridge to test it?  A reloaded cartridge might not be sized fully at the base, although it may fit in another firearm with a more generous chamber. 

2.  Did you use a bore scope to check the chamber on the off chance that an old cartridge neck is lodged in there?  At least you could examine the chamber in more detail. 

3. Have you notified the seller of the issue and asked for a little more time to troubleshoot the problem?

  

Yes, I am using a factory-loaded round and have actually tried multiples and same result.  I do not have a bore scope, but there is a good amount of corrosion in the chamber and bolt face.  Thinking corrosive primers were the culprit.  I plan on contacting the seller tomorrow.

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2646
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
May 9, 2025 - 7:32 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
Don,

I certainly would not accept that rifle as is.  Contacting Mark is a good idea, but I would first contact the seller to see what his thoughts are.  If Mark tells you he can fix it, I would negotiate with seller for a reduced price.  If the seller is not willing to negotiate, send it back for a full refund, and post the serial number of the gun so that other WACA members are aware of the issues with that specific gun.

Bert

  

Thanks Bert.  I’m going to contact the seller tomorrow.  It will likely be going back to them for a full refund.  If that’s the case, I’ll post the serial number as well.

Don

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5058
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
May 9, 2025 - 12:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Often, there is a reason a gun is up for sale.  It may well be the current seller had no idea of the issue.  This happens often among collectable rifles where rifles change hands and several of the owners never fired or even chambered a round.  But … one of the past owners did.

I have a cousin who recently purchased a Remington in .204 Ruger.  The rifle looks nearly new but he bought it at an auction.  It won’t extract even an empty case.  He asked what I thought and I said, “often, there is a reason a gun is up for sale” Wink

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2646
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
May 10, 2025 - 5:26 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Well, I contacted the seller and the rifle is being returned for a full refund and even refunding the shipping cost.  Seller also sent me a return UPS label at their expense.  It’s very unfortunate the chamber is toast since the rest of the rifle is a good 90-95% condition and a perfect bore (other than the badly pitted chamber).  It even had the “KSM” marked hammer and lever link.  For those wishing to avoid falling into this unfortunate trap, take note of serial number 20677–model 1895 standard sporting rifle with crescent butt, standard buckhorn barrel sight (no receiver sight) chambered in 30 US / 30-40 Krag.  It’s my belief this rifle fell victim to the corrosive primers of the day.  Makes me sick to my stomach….

Don

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12662
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
May 10, 2025 - 5:55 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Don,

That is good news, and thank you very much for posting the identity of the gun.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: cj57, 1ned1, JWA, Bill Jokela, Blue Ridge Parson, MNwin
Guest(s) 246
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6228
Chuck: 5662
steve004: 5058
1873man: 4669
Big Larry: 2516
twobit: 2484
mrcvs: 2150
Maverick: 1979
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14503
Posts: 129236

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2030
Members: 9833
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation