As Henry suggests, Winchester often described their special length magazines as fractional but sometimes described them as number of cartridges held. Customers didn’t always think in terms of fractions, rather they simply knew how many cartridges they wanted the magazine to hold and that’s what they specified in their order. In these cases, the number of cartridges held is is sometimes noted in the ledger rather than using a fraction.
oldcrankyyankee said
How common were 2/3 mags? I have an 86 elw that letters as 2/3 magazine.
The table below is derived from my research survey of the Model 1894s in the 354000 – 1079689 serial number range.
Mag Length | Qty | % | Est. |
Full | 8,271 | 86.51% | 627,778 |
½ | 909 | 9.51% | 68,994 |
⅔ | 345 | 3.61% | 26,186 |
¾ | 33 | 0.35% | 2,505 |
⅞ | 3 | 0.03% | 228 |
Total | 9,561 | 725,690 |
The statistics are much different for the late production Model 1886 rifles (serial range 146000 – 160000).
Magazine | Qty | % |
Full | 564 | 44.87% |
½ | 664 | 52.82% |
⅔ | 24 | 1.91% |
¾ | 5 | 0.40% |
Total | 1,257 | 100.00% |
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
1 Guest(s)
