Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 94
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 42
Member Since:
December 23, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
September 7, 2023 - 7:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

There’s a gun listed on GB 1004231281 that’s listed as an antique, but has proof mark on recvr. My understanding that started about 1905 or 6. If it was sent back for Repair would recvr be proofed?

Avatar
mrcvs
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2305
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
September 7, 2023 - 9:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

[email protected] said
There’s a gun listed on GB 1004231281 that’s listed as an antique, but has proof mark on recvr. My understanding that started about 1905 or 6. If it was sent back for Repair would recvr be proofed?

  

Yes, if after circa 1905.

Avatar
deerhunter
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2794
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
September 7, 2023 - 9:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The gun in question was actually manufactured in 1901–not 1898.

https://winchestercollector.org/dates/

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13656
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
September 7, 2023 - 11:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

[email protected] said
There’s a gun listed on GB 1004231281 that’s listed as an antique, but has proof mark on recvr. My understanding that started about 1905 or 6. If it was sent back for Repair would recvr be proofed?

  

More accurately, it has a Winchester proof mark stamped on both the barrel and receiver frame, which is what I would expect if the factory records show a “Repair & Return” entry.  Based on the caliber marking location on the barrel, it should have a “R&R” entry after 1907.  I most certainly would verify this gun through the CFM records office before considering at candidate for purchase.

As Don mentioned, the actual DOM is 1901 (September).  It is not “Antique”.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: antler1, 86Win, Jeremy P, Nathan, kevindpm61, MidwestCrisis
Guest(s) 35
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6894
Chuck: 6236
steve004: 5400
1873man: 4796
deerhunter: 2794
twobit: 2593
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2305
Maverick: 2100
Newest Members:
swmaynes
Randy3590
Goatman
HillbillyBiker
CTDIckson
Fig
5090sharps
Westx
Dave S
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15323
Posts: 138220

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10358
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation