Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 65 .218 Bee
Avatar
Stephen Crudele
New Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
July 31, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
July 31, 2016 - 10:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

A friend has a Winchester Model 65 in .218 Bee.  Serial number is 100237X. From what I find that places DOM in 1934, three years before the .218 Bee came out. Is this a rebarrel? It does have the bolt peep.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12976
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
August 1, 2016 - 2:21 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Stephen Crudele said
A friend has a Winchester Model 65 in .218 Bee.  Serial number is 100237X. From what I find that places DOM in 1934, three years before the .218 Bee came out. Is this a rebarrel? It does have the bolt peep.  

Stephen,

I recently wrote and published an article about the Model 65.  Based on my research, serial number 1002305 was the last receiver serialized in the year 1933, indicating serial number 100237x was most likely manufactured in January of 1934.  The 218 Bee cartridge was introduced in the latter half of the year 1937.  With that stated, Production of the Model 65 took place during the Great Depression, and serialized receiver frames sat in the assembly room bins/racks for extended amounts of time before being used to assemble a rifle.  If you check the 2-digit date on the bottom of the barrel, it will undoubtedly be marked “37”.  Thus far, I have found serialized receivers as high as 1003226 with a “37” marked 218 Bee barrel.  For my research survey, I would like to know what the complete serial number is, and if possible, the 2-digit year number marked on the bottom of the barrel (see the attached picture).

Bert

37-dated-barrel-1002724-218-Bee-1.jpgImage Enlarger

37-dated-barrel-1002957-218-Bee-1.jpgImage Enlarger

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Stephen Crudele
New Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 2
Member Since:
July 31, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
August 1, 2016 - 10:58 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert, I will see the owner on Friday and get the info for you. Thanks, Steve

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12976
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
4
August 1, 2016 - 2:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Stephen Crudele said
Bert, I will see the owner on Friday and get the info for you. Thanks, Steve  

Thank you, I appreciate itSmile

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
sb
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 471
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
August 2, 2016 - 6:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

What is the lowest 65 sn that you’ve found in the 218 bee?

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12976
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
6
August 2, 2016 - 8:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

It is one your’s… 982953. I also have 997143, 999956, 1000889, 1001314, 1001891, and 1002052. I suspect that all of them were assembled using previously unused receiver frames.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bert H., cj57, 1873man, win4575, mrcvs, JWA, Tedk, Henry Mero, TXGunNut, markone1966, Zebulon, Jeremy P
Guest(s) 658
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6444
Chuck: 5856
steve004: 5209
1873man: 4702
deerhunter: 2711
Big Larry: 2554
twobit: 2504
mrcvs: 2210
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
Peter Cipollini
Jhark
Oldtimer52
parkerposy
rayhobbs
WebleyScott
Task1
1886
Jerome Stevens
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14805
Posts: 132472

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10044
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation