Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Heads up
Avatar
Henry Mero
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1390
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
November 20, 2020 - 2:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The up coming Amoskeag auction lot #20; 1886 deluxe rifle I’m pretty sure has been re-stocked, They say the numbers, 445 on the tang and 405 on  the stock and butt plate march. According to My math that’s 40 #’s apart , plus the stock has a sling mount , the forend does not.  Also what thoughts on lot#50, the ’94 eng. deluxe?

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5173
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
November 20, 2020 - 4:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Maybe I’m just jaded or cynical but both the ’86 and the engraved ’94 left me a bit queasy.  The 86 doesn’t really add up (different stock numbers and the lack of a front swivel).  The condition gave me pause as well.  Some of the best case colors other combined with finish issues with the bluing.  Could of course just been due to bad storage (although that would mean only a portion of the rifle was stored poorly, not the entire rifle).

On the ’94, the caliber markings looked off to me.

Confused

Avatar
jwm94
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1118
Member Since:
May 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
November 20, 2020 - 7:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I don’t care for the ’86 for the reasons stated by Steve, although, I do no believe that Winchester is above mismatching numbers…it’s a downer for potential buyers.  

The caliber markings do look a bit off to me, too.  What a great rifle, though, and I really like the King front sight.

James

Avatar
Henry Mero
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1390
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
November 21, 2020 - 2:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I see they put up a “important ” notice “the assembly numbers all match”. They still can’t explain the sling mount in the stock though

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5173
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
5
November 21, 2020 - 3:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I recall many years back Merz had an ’86 with a swivel in the buttstock and nothing in the forearm.  The factory letter specified there was a swivel in the buttstock only.

Avatar
jwm94
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1118
Member Since:
May 24, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
November 21, 2020 - 5:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Once, again, we are reminded to never say never with what Winchester would or would not do, and likewise with the saying about having to make excuses and/or explanations as to the why of the matter.  Like Steve, I’m aware of Winchester installing a sling base in the stock of a very rare and expensive rifle with factory provenance, and not one in the front as well, although the stock screw for the front band could easily be replaced with a sling swivel.  

James

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: steve004, 86Win, Heather, Peter Brigham
Guest(s) 187
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6408
Chuck: 5809
steve004: 5173
1873man: 4698
deerhunter: 2694
Big Larry: 2549
twobit: 2493
mrcvs: 2194
Maverick: 2029
Newest Members:
ross
Model94-2025
R.E. Moore
sjGUESTEST
WindsurfAruba
cedar swamp savage
tradecraft
Weida78
Alby
Lambeau
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14715
Posts: 131640

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9982
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation