Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Crazy Horse Brass Length
Avatar
King Medallion
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 24
Member Since:
October 4, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 6, 2023 - 10:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi, can anyone tell me which brass length of 38/55 for the Crazy Horse Commemorative rifle is? Thanks.

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5838
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
February 6, 2023 - 11:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I doubt this rifle has a special length brass.  38-55 Win brass is 2.129″.

Avatar
King Medallion
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 24
Member Since:
October 4, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 7, 2023 - 4:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

So, the longer version. Drat! All I have is the 2.080.

Avatar
Easty
Guest
Guests
4
February 7, 2023 - 12:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Actually, I have Winchester 38-55 ammo both standard production and limited edition going back to the early 1950s and they all measure 2.080. I have heard and read conflicting opinions on when the industry standard changed to the shorter standard. Does anyone have the true info on this?

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6420
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 7, 2023 - 2:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Awhile back someone decided 2.125” was better for the 38-55 and Starline, among others, produced it. My limited research has produced no conclusion other than the necessity to sort brass by length. The article I read was very long-winded.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Easty
Guest
Guests
6
February 7, 2023 - 2:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I have some vintage 38-55 ammo from the twenties and they all measure 2.125. So 2.125 was actually the original nominal length for the early brass. Some time later the standard was shortened.

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5184
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
February 7, 2023 - 8:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

TXGunNut said
Awhile back someone decided 2.125” was better for the 38-55 and Starline, among others, produced it. My limited research has produced no conclusion other than the necessity to sort brass by length. The article I read was very long-winded.

 

Mike

  

I seem to recall at least one lengthy magazine article devoted exclusively to the length of .38-55 brass.

Avatar
1892takedown
South Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1101
Member Since:
March 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
February 7, 2023 - 9:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The brass length is going to be dependent on the length and shape of the bullet.  With the bullets that I cast, having a wide meplat and steep ogive, the brass has to be trimmed to 2.010 for an OACL of 2.5″, otherwise they will not cycle.  I can single load all day long but anything longer than 2.5, with the bullet Im using, wont work.  Ive shot with the longer brass and shorter brass and cant tell much of any difference at 100 yards.

DSC_0245-Copy-3.JPG

1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member

"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6420
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
February 9, 2023 - 1:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

steve004 said

TXGunNut said

Awhile back someone decided 2.125” was better for the 38-55 and Starline, among others, produced it. My limited research has produced no conclusion other than the necessity to sort brass by length. The article I read was very long-winded.

 

Mike

  

I seem to recall at least one lengthy magazine article devoted exclusively to the length of .38-55 brass.

  

At one time it was linked from the Starline site. Do not go to StarlineUSA, it’s a clone of their site.

 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6420
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
February 9, 2023 - 1:10 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

1892takedown said
The brass length is going to be dependent on the length and shape of the bullet.  With the bullets that I cast, having a wide meplat and steep ogive, the brass has to be trimmed to 2.010 for an OACL of 2.5″, otherwise they will not cycle.  I can single load all day long but anything longer than 2.5, with the bullet Im using, wont work.  Ive shot with the longer brass and shorter brass and cant tell much of any difference at 100 yards.

  

Interesting, ran into that with a very early (sn 5310) 1894 and an Accurate 38255L mould. My default OAL was 2.535”.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
1892takedown
South Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1101
Member Since:
March 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
February 9, 2023 - 5:58 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Mike,

The mould Im referring to is the 38-55SG with gas check.  The difference between the two is shown in the pic below.  The mould you have, 38-255L, is the one on the left, 38-55SG on the right. 

DSC02459.JPG

I had a mould made with both and opted to go with the 38-55SG because of the wider meplat, was thinking it would give just a little more wollup when it hit a critter.  Ive not tried loading any with the Accurate 38-255L bullet yet.  The 38-255L is closer to the specs for the original period 38-55 mould – I think.  I wish I had a cast 38-255L to show all three.  Below is a period Winchester mold cast bullet in comparison with the 38-55SG bullet. 

 

DSC02470.JPGDSC02463.JPG

As I mentioned above, the bullet shape may dictate what will feed dependent on the OACL

Chris

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

DSC_0245-Copy-3.JPG

1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member

"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5838
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
12
February 9, 2023 - 10:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

All my books show the OAL of the case to be 2.129″ but when I checked SAAMI it is now listed as 2.085″.  I don’t have any idea when or whom changed the specs.

38-55-saami.jpg

Sorry for the extra pictures.  Had a hard time getting this to load.

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bill Hockett, Chuck, slk, Manuel, Tedk, 86Win, M64lvr
Guest(s) 148
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6420
Chuck: 5836
steve004: 5184
1873man: 4701
deerhunter: 2705
Big Larry: 2551
twobit: 2497
mrcvs: 2202
Maverick: 2037
Newest Members:
JUSTME3275
win70pre64
Danrr
GTUDEAN
rbrettallen
mattawoman
Brad
RUSS
David Smith
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14772
Posts: 132092

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10021
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation