Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Another unusual find.
Avatar
rogertherelic
Santa Clara, CA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 928
Member Since:
January 27, 1992
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
August 19, 2021 - 10:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

About seven years ago I spotted an unusual offering on one of the higher quality auction sights.  I am attracted to unusual and strange Winchesters.  So I jumped in and found others were interested also, as the price rose quickly.  As it turned out I had the deepest interest and pockets that day.  The rifle is a late Model 92 serial number 999935 and the caliber is 218 BEE.  

RIA-1892-218-bee.jpgImage Enlarger  I wasn’t sure if the rifle was correct or not, but the Model and caliber had me hooked.  I had just seen a similar gun sell for over $20,000 on another notable auction sight.  I was aware that Winchester used parts on hand to assemble some guns just to clear their inventory of parts on hand, so I took a chance.  This rifle has a 1950 barrel date and it’s possible the barrel used was made from a Model 43 barrel.  When I received the gun I was more than pleased with the condition, but I found the butt stock unattractive.  I was fortunate to have, what I consider to be, a ‘correct’ butt stock.  So I made the change for better or worse, you be the judge.  Your opinions would be appreciated.  Thanks.  RDB

92-BEE-001.JPGImage Enlarger92-BEE-002.JPGImage Enlarger92-BEE-003.JPGImage Enlarger92-BEE-004.JPGImage Enlarger92-BEE-005.JPGImage Enlarger92-BEE-006.JPGImage Enlarger92-BEE-008.JPGImage Enlarger92-BEE-010.JPGImage Enlarger

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12865
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
August 19, 2021 - 11:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hello Roger,

I had this entered in my survey as S/N 999935 versus 999932… do I need to update/correct my survey?

In regards to the butt stock, it appears to be a Model 53 stock, but could be correct on any late production Model 92.  The “50” date on the barrel positively identifies it as a repurposed Model 43 barrel.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
August 19, 2021 - 11:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Your replacement looks much better.  But if the carbine buttstock is original, I think it ought to stay on. 

Avatar
rogertherelic
Santa Clara, CA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 928
Member Since:
January 27, 1992
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
August 20, 2021 - 12:43 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Clarence, I have carefully packed and boxed the checked carbine butt stock.  The carbine butt plate still has most of it’s original blue.

Burt, my error, you have the correct number  999935 is correct.  I will amend the original post.  I think you are correct about the Model 53 stock.  It does match the description given in the Madis Book, only it has a fluted stock. The checked carbine stock just didn’t work for me…Embarassed RDB

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6408
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
August 20, 2021 - 1:50 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

FWIW I doubt I would have noticed the shotgun butt stock was “wrong”. I’m a big fan of shotgun butts but I can live with a carbine butt, maybe even that one. Do you reckon that was the original butt stock?

It’s your gun, you like it. That’s what matters.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
rogertherelic
Santa Clara, CA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 928
Member Since:
January 27, 1992
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
August 20, 2021 - 3:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

This is the 92 rifle that sold for over $20 grand.  It is also pictured in the Madis Book, which added to it’s value.  This is the main of the reason I choose to change the butt stock.  RDB

218-92.jpgImage Enlarger218-B.jpgImage Enlarger218-barrel.jpgImage Enlarger218-Bee.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bill Jokela, Louis Luttrell, Zebulon, Green River Gus, Jeremy P
Guest(s) 264
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6408
Chuck: 5808
steve004: 5173
1873man: 4698
deerhunter: 2694
Big Larry: 2549
twobit: 2493
mrcvs: 2194
Maverick: 2029
Newest Members:
ross
Model94-2025
R.E. Moore
sjGUESTEST
WindsurfAruba
cedar swamp savage
tradecraft
Weida78
Alby
Lambeau
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14714
Posts: 131629

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9982
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation