Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1897 Riot Gun
Avatar
Kevin K.
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
February 23, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 23, 2017 - 3:41 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Looking at buying an 1897 Riot Gun with serial number 932470. My concern is that it is stamped with a WB cartouche. My understanding is that this cartouche is outside the expected serial range for these guns.  I’ll try and post pics in this thread so that the experts on this forum can take a look and tell me if my concerns are warranted. 

Thanks in advance! 

Avatar
Kevin K.
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
February 23, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 23, 2017 - 3:43 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Close up of cartouche….

Avatar
Kevin K.
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
February 23, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 23, 2017 - 3:45 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Serial number…

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14075
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 23, 2017 - 4:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Kevin,

Your “understanding” of the time period for the “WB” cartouche is in error.  All of the WW II Riot & Trench Guns manufactured through May 1942 should have the “WB” cartouche. After that date, the “GHD” cartouche was used.

Now, and with that stated, the ordnance bomb stamp on your gun appears to be a fake.  The correct (authentic) ordnance bomb is as shown in the attached pictures below;

Bert

 

Ordnance-markings.jpgZZM313-Z-CU1-L.jpgFIY521-G-CU1-L.jpgOrdnance-marking.jpg

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Big Larry
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 2578
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 23, 2017 - 4:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

DSCF0480.JPGDSCF0487.JPGMay well be too early for the ord. bomb and maybe someone added one. Not unheard of for fake markings to be applied to these shotguns. Lets see the ord. bomb on the bbl. This is Trenchgun # E 955552, 3-1943.

How much for the shotgun?  Big Larry

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 14075
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
February 23, 2017 - 5:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Big Larry said
DSCF0480.JPGDSCF0487.JPGMay well be too early for the ord. bomb and maybe someone added one. Not unheard of for fake markings to be applied to these shotguns. Lets see the ord. bomb on the bbl. This is Trenchgun # E 955552, 3-1943.

How much for the shotgun?  Big Larry  

Larry,

No, it is not too early for the ordnance bomb … I have surveyed dozens of Model 97 Riot & Trench Guns with the ordnance bomb on them as early as serial number 924000.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Tom Doniphon
Guest
Guests
7
February 23, 2017 - 6:28 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Yes, my data also shows some early 97 Military riot guns in the 924,xxx range that have both the US and ordnance bomb on the receiver.  But slightly later riots only have the US mark.  Early WW2 97 trench guns in the lower serial number range are mostly marked with the US only on the receiver.  There are, however, some US and ordnance bomb marked trench guns in the lower serial number range too.  I can only speculate that some of these early shotguns with both marks had the receivers stamped with the marks and assembled at a later date out of numerical order.

Avatar
Kevin K.
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
February 23, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
February 23, 2017 - 6:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

All of you all are a wealth of information. Thanks!  

This shotgun is currently up for auction. I believe the starting bid is $375.

So, everything looks good except for the bomb stamp appears to be fake or added after production. With that being questionable, what price range should this gun expect to bring? Just ballpark as I know most would like to look at it personally.

Thanks again for all of the responses.

Avatar
Big Larry
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 2578
Member Since:
December 31, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
February 24, 2017 - 12:12 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I would not have a clue as I have been out of martial arms collecting for several years.  Big Larry

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: Rick Hill, Maverick, cjs57, Zebulon, MidwestCrisis
Guest(s) 379
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7181
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6529
steve004: 5558
1873man: 4871
deerhunter: 2883
twobit: 2662
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2389
Maverick: 2171
Newest Members:
bumppo
Frag
Dozer
Palijim
Lenny71
SVDavis
TheBigC
longranger
Motorman59
Dan H
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15659
Posts: 142289

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10550
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation