Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester 1886 mfd 1889
Avatar
F.K.
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 43
Member Since:
September 16, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
May 28, 2025 - 6:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Hi everyone, I recently was offered a 86 rifle  in 45-70 , serial no. 28793, thus made in 1889. 

Beautiful thing, but what confuses me is the fact, that it features a buckhorn rear sight. I thought these were not found on the 45-70. 

Can’t post a pic right now but I will try to get one soon… 

Does anybody know more about the correct sights etc. ? 

The rifle though standard straight stock with oct barrel seems to feature fancy wood since the stock is marked with xx somewhere under the metal… (could not confirm it but thats what the owner told me)…

 

Thanks a lot, guys , best regards, 

Felix 

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13331
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
May 28, 2025 - 6:33 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I am relatively certain that the standard rear sight was a Rocky Mountain sporting (buckhorn) sight on the standard Model 1886 Sporting rifle.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Steven Gabrielli
LI NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 351
Member Since:
August 14, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
May 28, 2025 - 1:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I agree with Bert, my first year production 1886 in 45-70 has a buckhorn.IMG_0647.jpegImage Enlarger

IMG_0644.jpegImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13331
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 28, 2025 - 4:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I will add that the early Model 1886 rifles are also found with a “Sporting Leaf” rear sight that resembles a Carbine ladder sight but are longer in length.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6043
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
May 28, 2025 - 4:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I have 2 86’s and they both have the buckhorn sight.  I had one that had the ladder sight.

Avatar
mrcvs
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2276
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
May 28, 2025 - 5:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said
I will add that the early Model 1886 rifles are also found with a “Sporting Leaf” rear sight that resembles a Carbine ladder sight but are longer in length.

Bert  

And they are sometimes marked “1876” as they were manufactured originally for the Model 1876 rifle.

Avatar
F.K.
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 43
Member Since:
September 16, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
May 28, 2025 - 5:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said
I will add that the early Model 1886 rifles are also found with a “Sporting Leaf” rear sight that resembles a Carbine ladder sight but are longer in length.

Bert

  

Yes , exactly! It is also mentioned as standard for the 45-70 in contemporary catalogues around 1888. So I was wondering, if it is original or maybe a custom order…. 

Avatar
Steven Gabrielli
LI NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 351
Member Since:
August 14, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
May 28, 2025 - 5:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

If you stated it was listed as standard in contemporary catalogs in 1888 and your rifle was made in 1889 why would you think it was a custom order?

Avatar
Anthony
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1171
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
May 28, 2025 - 9:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Felix,

I can agree with the above comments on the rear sight. First thing that comes to my mind is that an incorrect rear sight, never stopped me from buying a model 1886.

With that being said, I re read you’re post, after reading what Steven stated above, and if there’s a chance that you’re rifle is a special ordered rifle, due to the wood being, “XX”, I wouldn’t simply trust the owners, word, but a further inspection, of the tang being stamped with the marks that he states under the wood, would help to clarify this.

Pictures would help, but a call to Jessica at Cody, and her and or her staff taking a look into the records and or a worksheet on the rifle could help explain things.

 

Anthony

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: 1873man, bhutch, deerhunter, Chris D, 86Win, Tony Ford, Glshuck, B_Hank28
Guest(s) 374
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6711
Chuck: 6043
steve004: 5299
1873man: 4765
deerhunter: 2757
Big Larry: 2578
twobit: 2550
mrcvs: 2276
Maverick: 2062
Newest Members:
Pjlukefahr
Akreps
Big Mike 56
Papawsguns
ColtManCookson
Old-timer
Wdkirk01
F54
BPJACK
Badger557
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15079
Posts: 135556

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10229
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation