Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Why the 28” barrel on 30 US 1895’s?
Avatar
helidriver72
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 18
Member Since:
December 9, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 21, 2024 - 2:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Was there a reason they went with such a long barrel? I know longer barrel were common on some large bore single shots but most previous lever guns had shorter barrels. I wouldn’t think that long of barrel would be necessary to burn the powder of that cartridge. Don’t get me wrong I like them and just bought one!

Avatar
Blue Ridge Parson
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 295
Member Since:
June 1, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 21, 2024 - 3:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Longer sight radius gave some slight increase in accuracy?  Only a guess.

BRP

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5209
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 21, 2024 - 4:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

helidriver72 said
Was there a reason they went with such a long barrel? I know longer barrel were common on some large bore single shots but most previous lever guns had shorter barrels. I wouldn’t think that long of barrel would be necessary to burn the powder of that cartridge. Don’t get me wrong I like them and just bought one!

  

I had always assumed it was more toward wringing out higher velocity of the cartridge.  During a similar time frame, Sir Charles went mainly with 28 inch barrels for his .280 Ross cartridge.  Sort of interesting how when it came to the .30-06 or .30-03, a 24 inch barrel was standard in the M1895.  

Avatar
tim tomlinson
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 912
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 21, 2024 - 4:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

As long as we are guessing, I would guess it is due to the Army having the early Krags with 28 inch barrels.  Ballistics were basically then known.  Yes, I know.  The model is an 1895 and the early Army rifle was a model 1896, but likely the Army was working with a prototype at least a year earlier.  All pure guessing on my part. I fully suspect the effort was to get the most velocity from the powders then available.  Later they could achieve sufficient with shorter barrels for those other cartridges like the .30 Gov’t of 1903, etc.  Tim

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12977
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
December 21, 2024 - 5:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

I completely agree with Tim’s theory about the ballistics of the 30 U.S. (30/40 Krag) cartridge being the reason Winchester chose the 28-inch barrel length for the Model 1895 rifles chambered for that cartridge.  The Springfield Armory developed the 30 U.S. cartridge and determined that its optimum ballistics were achieved with a 28-inch barrel.

However, I will add a minor correction in that the early Springfield Krag service rifles were actually Model 1892s versus Model 1896.  I own a Model 1892 Springfield Krag rifle (s/n 25766) that was manufactured very early in the year 1895.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6448
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
December 22, 2024 - 1:03 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I suspect it had to do with the powders available. They had advanced a bit past Cordite but not much. Today we can select a smokeless powder to optimize burn in a given barrel length. In the early days of smokeless powder the barrel length was probably selected to optimize powder performance. Just a guess, but I know smokeless powder has come a long way since the early days of the 30US.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
tim tomlinson
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 912
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
December 22, 2024 - 3:47 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert, Yeah, I forgot about the 1892 Krag.  I forget about a lot anymore.  Still as you say, bottom line is trying to get velocity with available powders, I suspect. Besides, taking a side road, a 28 inch barreled, military musket gets you a longer reach with the bayonet!  Tim

Avatar
helidriver72
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 18
Member Since:
December 9, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
December 22, 2024 - 3:59 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thanks for all the replies, I’m just looking forward to getting my hands on it👍

Avatar
tim tomlinson
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 912
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
December 22, 2024 - 4:43 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

FWIW, the tapered 28 inch barrel on the 1895 looks rather svelte.  I am sure you will like it.  Unfortunately I tell folks the 1895 model is like fungus–it grows on you!  Tim

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6448
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
December 22, 2024 - 5:00 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

tim tomlinson said
FWIW, the tapered 28 inch barrel on the 1895 looks rather svelte.  I am sure you will like it.  Unfortunately I tell folks the 1895 model is like fungus–it grows on you!  Tim

  

Agreed, Tim. One reason I bought my latest 1895 from Mark is the cartridge intrigued me and his 1895 had nice wood and a great barrel. I have brass, dies and even a suitable mould. One of the best things about the 1895 is the cartridges found in this model. I’m not a fan of the 1895 but am fascinated when I work the action. How did JMB figure that out with pencil, paper and cardboard?

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Brad Dunbar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 986
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
December 22, 2024 - 2:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I think the 28-inch barrel was specifically designed to be difficult to use in the brush and sproutsLaugh Model 1895 owners back in the day were likely very tempted to cut the 28-inch barrel down.  I remember having something in a past magazine about Whelen ordering a 30 U.S. 1895 with a heavier and shorter barrel.  I think that was in the 1895 book too.

When we were working on the book, we were very fortunate to use a lot of different gun photos that were submitted by collectors.  I was also fortunate to go on the road a few times to take photos of 1895s that ended up in the book.  Related to the OP’s other post on the 22-inch barrel, one of those rifles I looked at then was a really nice, pistol-grip, semi-deluxe 30 U.S.”flatside” with a factory Lyman 21, Lyman 6 on the barrel, and a slip-over front sight on the end of the significantly-shortened barrel.  I doubt the person that did the cutting put much thought into the rarity of a high-condition, semi-deluxe 1st Model.

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: 88 man, [email protected], kevindpm61
Guest(s) 266
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6448
Chuck: 5856
steve004: 5209
1873man: 4702
deerhunter: 2711
Big Larry: 2556
twobit: 2504
mrcvs: 2211
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
Peter Cipollini
Jhark
Oldtimer52
parkerposy
rayhobbs
WebleyScott
Task1
1886
Jerome Stevens
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14806
Posts: 132484

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10044
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation