Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Proof marks on 1894 trapper
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2655
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 17, 2017 - 7:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

These proof marks look fishy to me–see photo #10.  Shouldn’t they match since they should have been applied at the same time?  The proof mark on the receiver looks completely wrong (missing the “P” completely, the “W” looks way off, and the overall stamp is the wrong size) and a gun with a 41805 serial number shouldn’t even have proof marks unless it was sent back to the factory for rework after 1905, right?  Every Winchester I have with proof marks match each other.  Also, in the same photo it looks like the original caliber marking on the top of the barrel behind the rear sight has been ground off with the caliber stamping moved to the side by bubba.  Maybe this one of those made-up trappers with a non-original barrel, etc???  I’m not interested in this rifle, but just looking to test my skills at identifying a fake.  What do the experts think?

http://www.gunsinternational.com/guns-for-sale-online/rifles/winchester-rifles-model-1894-pre-64/antique-winchester-1894-trapper-with-15-quot-bbl.cfm?gun_id=100807106

Don

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 702
Member Since:
August 27, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 17, 2017 - 9:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The text in the last pic notes that the gun has an 1895 receiver fitted with a post 1906 barrel….

“If you can’t convince them, confuse them”

President Harry S. Truman

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2655
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
March 17, 2017 - 10:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Tedk said
The text in the last pic notes that the gun has an 1895 receiver fitted with a post 1906 barrel….  

Thanks Ted.  I missed that part of the listing.  It still looks to me that someone attempted to fake the proof mark on the receiver.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: 1ned1, 426crown, tsbccut, M64lvr
Guest(s) 237
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6246
Chuck: 5676
steve004: 5064
1873man: 4671
Big Larry: 2519
twobit: 2487
mrcvs: 2154
Maverick: 1989
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14532
Posts: 129555

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2032
Members: 9853
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation