Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Odd Finding
Avatar
sb
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 471
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 22, 2019 - 5:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

I recently looked at an antique Winchester model 1892.  It was an interesting gun in 44-40 with a half round barrel.  Both the receiver and barrel had proof marks on them and the barrel has an address that is from a later time frame….maybe, 1908 or so.

I sent in to the museum for the letter information on it before buying it and I was quite surprised to learn that it letters as a 32-20.   What do you make of this?  The gun is not a high condition gun and it looks legit…..

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13002
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 22, 2019 - 7:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Was there a “R&R” entry for it in the ledger information? If not, you should assume that someone other than Winchester reworked it and put the proof mark stamps on it.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
TR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1880
Member Since:
June 4, 2017
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
March 22, 2019 - 7:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

 The 32/20 is small frame and the 44/40 is large, how does that work? T/R

Avatar
sb
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 471
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
March 22, 2019 - 8:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

No R&R listed

Avatar
sb
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 471
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
March 22, 2019 - 9:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

TR said
 The 32/20 is small frame and the 44/40 is large, how does that work? T/R  

That’s why i thought it was so odd

Avatar
win4575
Montana
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 701
Member Since:
November 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
March 23, 2019 - 1:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Anyone that knows anything about the 1892 model, should know that it is virtually impossible to change a .44 to a .32.  Winchester would never have done this, simply because it was cost prohibitive.  The factory was very contious of the fact that their customers trusted them to make a decision that would be of benefit to the customer as far as rework was concerned.  I dought they would think changing a .44 to a .32 would benefit the customer financially.  My guess is that either the researcher at the museum made a mistake or the original entry in the ledger was a mistake from the get go.

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2505
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
March 23, 2019 - 1:57 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

sb said
I recently looked at an antique Winchester model 1892.  It was an interesting gun in 44-40 with a half round barrel.  Both the receiver and barrel had proof marks on them and the barrel has an address that is from a later time frame….maybe, 1908 or so.

I sent in to the museum for the letter information on it before buying it and I was quite surprised to learn that it letters as a 32-20.   What do you make of this?  The gun is not a high condition gun and it looks legit…..  

Hello SB,

What is the serial number of the rifle?  Can you post or send me some images of the gun and all of the stamped writing on it?

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13002
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
March 23, 2019 - 4:23 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

win4575 said
Anyone that knows anything about the 1892 model, should know that it is virtually impossible to change a .44 to a .32.  Winchester would never have done this, simply because it was cost prohibitive.  The factory was very contious of the fact that their customers trusted them to make a decision that would be of benefit to the customer as far as rework was concerned.  I dought they would think changing a .44 to a .32 would benefit the customer financially.  My guess is that either the researcher at the museum made a mistake or the original entry in the ledger was a mistake from the get go.  

It is the opposite in this case… a 32 WCF was possibly changed to a 44 WCF, and that is certainly possible if someone was intent on doing it.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
TR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1880
Member Since:
June 4, 2017
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
9
March 23, 2019 - 1:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

 sb, If you had good pictures of the gun, including pictures with the forearm removed showing the area of the receiver were the magazine tube fits in, I think the question would be answered. Factory, Bubba, or ledger error. If it doesn’t feed and fire smoothly it’s probably Bubba. T/R

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: win1894, cj57, deerhunter, TR, Ben, Jeremy P
Guest(s) 566
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6486
Chuck: 5890
steve004: 5217
1873man: 4706
deerhunter: 2713
Big Larry: 2560
twobit: 2505
mrcvs: 2213
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
Andy
James Luoma
DM2012
redfish282000
MFoster
Daltsav
Monk1950
Redcedar7T
KrzHorse
drjjpdc
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14828
Posts: 132750

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10063
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation