
January 14, 2022

Hey folks. I joined the site a couple of years ago but this is my first post. I’m the proud owner of a Model 88 collection of all 4 of the calibers. My dad introduced me to white tail hunting at an early age and these were the only guns we ever hunted with. I’ve taken deer with every one of them, even the .358 using open sights! Dad died earlier this year and I’m not as mad at the deer these days, so I’ve decided to sell the set. The main question I have is whether they are more valuable together or sold separately? (Or does it make any difference?)
As far as the age and condition of each. I believe that all but the .284 are post-64 models. The stocks are all original and my Dad’s primary gun was the .284. So that one has the most wear on the stock but it’s still in decent condition. All have been well maintained throughout the years.
I appreciate the feedback and happy to answer any questions about the collection.
Thanks, Lane.

January 14, 2022

Thanks Chuck. Here is a pic of each serial number with the caliber also visible:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/V2CupSUyJwT1cETEA
From the Murray book on the Model 88, it looks like the .358 is pre-57 and the .284 is pre-64 which makes it pretty rare. I hadn’t noticed that there was only one year of .284 production prior to 64.

April 1, 2005

Jay McCullough said
Thanks Chuck. Here is a pic of each serial number with the caliber also visible:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/V2CupSUyJwT1cETEA
From the Murray book on the Model 88, it looks like the .358 is pre-57 and the .284 is pre-64 which makes it pretty rare. I hadn’t noticed that there was only one year of .284 production prior to 64.
Jay – these guns all have the “basket weave” checkering which was not used until 1964. My experience is that these are harder to sell than the pre-64 specimens and as with all Winchester lever models, condition plays a huge role in determining collectability and price – the .284 and .358 are more desirable. Here is a photo of a pre-64 with the early style checkering for comparison.

January 20, 2023

Jay, you had asked whether you should offer the rifles as a set or severally. I don’t have a ready answer but I can tell you how I would go about deciding how to sell.
1. At least based on the images you posted, none of these rifles are pristine. It would be helpful in assigning a condition to each of them if you made more extensive photography available. Condition is very important when trying to sell post-63 Winchesters made before the mid to late Nineteen Seventies, when some measure of sanity returned to the Commercial Gun Department (co-extensively with the end of the Vietnam War and huge annual.sales of military ammunition.)
2. The 284 and 358 caliber rifles are likely the most valuable because few were made. But condition is a big factor in those cases, too.
3. The best way to determine value of a post-63 Model 88 that I know of is to make a comprehensive survey of the CLOSED online auctions of the model– just the post-63 variants — sorting them to show highest number of bids (not bid amounts) first. Look at the auction pictures and compare conditions to your own guns. Gunbroker is a prime source of this information.
4. This survey will also show you, if anything will, premiums or discounts for particular calibers.
5. The same survey – and a similar survey of then still open auctions — should give you some idea of the current demand for the post-63 Model 88.
6. If the perceived demand for your 358 and 284 IN THEIR PRESENT CONDITIONS is very high, and the demand for the other two is at least average, I would, speaking for myself, auction them all separately.
7. To do that, you have to do extensive photography –not just one or two images. You want to be selling to end users, not dealers, for top dollar. 20 or 30 clear, we’ll lit, in-focus images per gun.
8. Post-63 Model 88 rifles in 308 and 243 are not attractive to collectors, although hunters seem to like them. The only way I would consider auctioning all four as a set would be if the perceived values of the 284 and 358 were stratospheric and those of the 308 and 243 were in the gutter. Maybe, the package could yield more than two big hitters and two dogs. But it would shut out a lot of bidders and I frankly don’t like the idea.
9 Setting up a good auction is hard work that takes time. But it can pay big dividends. I think 14 day no-reserve auctions are best. Don’t do dollar start auctions unless you really know what you’ve got. Otherwise, set the minimum bid at the least you’ll take. If that’s too high you’ll know it because nobody will bid but you won’t suffer a catastrophe.
10. You can consign to a local.dealer but you’ll give up 15% to 25% of the proceeds. The worse problem is dealers want to low ball the selling price to make a quick sale. Know what your gun is worth at retail, don’t let the dealer set the price.
11. In sum, [A] knowledge is power. Do the research before you put these guns up for sale. (B) Good, extensive photography is mandatory before anybody can assess condition or take a buying interest.
I hope this helps a bit.
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.

January 14, 2022

Thanks guys. I appreciate the expertise and the advice. I agree with the direction you are pointing me in as far as selling strategy goes. However, I do want to clarify the pre-64/post-64 assertions for the .284 and the .358.
1) Is the Murray book wrong about the serial numbers for the .284 and .358? (.284 = 150569A; .358 = 71310). My take away from the Murray book on Model 88s is that the .284 is a 1963 version and the .358 is pre-57).
2) As far as the “basket weave” pattern on the stock… The only info that I can offer related to that is that, as far as I can remember, my Dad had the .284 from the point I was born in 1964. I can say with certainty that he had it since 1970 because of pictures, etc. For the .358. We picked that up at a gun show in 1976 or 77. I remember that because I got scolded for getting too excited in front of the seller and making it impossible for dad to negotiate the price.
So, if you are saying that, even if the serial number is pre-64 or pre-57, the weave pattern on the stock is not correct for those dates then where can I verify that? And does that mean that both of the guns had their stock replaced? I could believe that for the .358, but I’m going to need some convincing on the .284.
Thanks again for all the great info. I haven’t been able to give the guns a good cleaning since they were removed from the gun safe where they sat idle for more than 10 years. But once that is done, I’ll post pics. I just retired from corporate life and I’ve got some time now to do these things.
Lane

January 20, 2023

Lane, I was of age (20) in 1964 and a subscriber to Gun Digest. I can still recall the howling that went up when “the new look” line — including the burnt-in oakleaf checkering pattern stocks on the Winchester Models 88 and 100 — were introduced in early 1964.
I need to go back and read your posts about the serial numbers and what sources you used to obtain dates of manufacture. I will take the serial numbers down and try to trace them myself from sources I know to be reliable. 7
However, if a Model 88 was manufactured with impressed oakleaf checkering patterns before late 1963, it would be a miracle of the first water because Winchester installed the necessary equipment to create “checkering” patterns on stocks using pressure and heat no earlier than1962.
In any event, it is the existence and appearance of the dis-favored stocking (and some other disliked manufacturing processes incorporated at the same time), that depresses the collector value of such rifles, not a serial number itself.
I’ll try to get back to you today but it may have to be later.
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.

January 20, 2023

Lane, one more thing about serial numbers. The receiver, which bears the serial number, was manufactured and serialized before it was incorporated into a complete gun.
It may be the serial number of your 284 receiver was applied before the financially disastrous manufacturing change orders were implemented in 1963. However, the stock itself is irrefutable evidence of a “post 63” rifle that was assembled and shipped from the warehouse as a 1964 gun.
Your 284 is not going to have the value of a “pre’64” model 88 in 284 caliber, serial number to the contrary notwithstanding.
If any of my more knowledgeable colleagues in WACA disagree with the above, please chime in and say so.
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.

April 15, 2005

Ponderer1234 said
Thanks guys. I appreciate the expertise and the advice. I agree with the direction you are pointing me in as far as selling strategy goes. However, I do want to clarify the pre-64/post-64 assertions for the .284 and the .358.
1) Is the Murray book wrong about the serial numbers for the .284 and .358? (.284 = 150569A; .358 = 71310). My take away from the Murray book on Model 88s is that the .284 is a 1963 version and the .358 is pre-57).
2) As far as the “basket weave” pattern on the stock… The only info that I can offer related to that is that, as far as I can remember, my Dad had the .284 from the point I was born in 1964. I can say with certainty that he had it since 1970 because of pictures, etc. For the .358. We picked that up at a gun show in 1976 or 77. I remember that because I got scolded for getting too excited in front of the seller and making it impossible for dad to negotiate the price.
So, if you are saying that, even if the serial number is pre-64 or pre-57, the weave pattern on the stock is not correct for those dates then where can I verify that? And does that mean that both of the guns had their stock replaced? I could believe that for the .358, but I’m going to need some convincing on the .284.
Thanks again for all the great info. I haven’t been able to give the guns a good cleaning since they were removed from the gun safe where they sat idle for more than 10 years. But once that is done, I’ll post pics. I just retired from corporate life and I’ve got some time now to do these things.
Lane
Lane,
Per the serialization records I have access to;
S/N 150569A was manufactured in the latter half of the year 1964. The “basket-weave” stock checkering positively confirms that it is a Post-1963 production rifle.
S/N 71310 was manufactured in the Fall of 1958. The stock currently on the rifle is not original to the gun, and as such, it will negatively affect the value of the rifle in the collector market.
If Murray’s book has different dates listed for those serial numbers, he has published erroneous information.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

January 14, 2022

Thanks Bill and Bert for the information. It sounds like I have a couple of pre-64 “receivers” but with the wrong stocks to be considered genuine pre-64 guns? Similar to rare muscle cars, “my numbers are not matching”. Is there any way to date the stocks if I were to remove them? At this point I’m very curious about the .284. The 358 is understandable since the stock was near perfect when we bought it.
I wanted to provide the source information from the Murray book I’m referring to. It’s obviously not greatly detailed but it’s interesting reading. These are from the reference section on Production:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/iVYJBEJ9CsU9i5Rd6
Is it possible that the mechanical part of the .284 was created in ’63 but it was paired and shipped as complete in ’64 or after? I don’t see any commentary that references the “A” in the serial number. Could that be part of this story?
Thanks,
Lane

April 15, 2005

Ponderer1234 said
Thanks Bill and Bert for the information. It sounds like I have a couple of pre-64 “receivers” but with the wrong stocks to be considered genuine pre-64 guns? Similar to rare muscle cars, “my numbers are not matching”. Is there any way to date the stocks if I were to remove them? At this point I’m very curious about the .284. The 358 is understandable since the stock was near perfect when we bought it.
I wanted to provide the source information from the Murray book I’m referring to. It’s obviously not greatly detailed but it’s interesting reading. These are from the reference section on Production:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/iVYJBEJ9CsU9i5Rd6
Is it possible that the mechanical part of the .284 was created in ’63 but it was paired and shipped as complete in ’64 or after? I don’t see any commentary that references the “A” in the serial number. Could that be part of this story?
Thanks,
Lane
Lane,
You apparently misunderstood my previous reply to this topic. I will reiterate it for you… Model 88 serial number 150569A is not a 1963 (pre-64) production rifle. It was manufactured in the latter half of the year 1964, and the stock on the rifle it is extremely likely to be factory original.
In answer to your question “Is there any way to date the stocks if I were to remove them?” the answer is No, there is not. Winchester did not date stamp stocks.
In answer to your question “Is it possible that the mechanical part of the .284 was created in ’63 but it was paired and shipped as complete in ’64 or after?” the answer is Very unlikely.
The “A” suffix was added to the serial numbers as a result of mechanical improvements that were made to the receiver group, and it was incorporated in the year 1958 (at approximately serial number 80000). It has nothing to do with the stock types.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

January 14, 2022

Okay. I think I got it. The only pre-64 receiver we’re looking at is for the 358 and everyone agrees that mine does not have the original stock. So the 284 is probably all “original” but it’s post-64 production. Bottom line is that I don’t really have a highly valued collectible in my collection. Therefore, selling them as a set is probably not going to work to my advantage.
I’ve got time to clean them up now. I’ll bring the pics to the group when I’m done.
Thanks again for the help.
Lane
1 Guest(s)
