Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
model 71's question.
Avatar
oldcrankyyankee
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 996
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
November 1, 2025 - 3:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I was curious of what opinions others have about this. Give all things equal regarding 71’s, would you value a long tang over a short tang or vise versa. 

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13331
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
November 1, 2025 - 4:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Tom,

It is not the tang length that is important to me.  Instead, it is the date of manufacture (time period).  I personally value the Pre-WW II Model 71s higher than those that were manufactured after WW II.  The overall quality of the fit & finish is better, and the stock checkering was better. 

For those that fixate on the “long tang” versus “short tang”, I believe that they are confusing it with “Pre” and “Post” War.  The transition from the “long” tang to “short” tang took place in late June 1939 (serial range 16646 – 16790).  The “Pre” War transition was in the 22950 – 23000 serial range.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
oldcrankyyankee
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 996
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
November 1, 2025 - 4:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

That is an interesting opinion. I think I will have to agree with you on all counts. I was asking because I saw 2 different auctions and each one had a deluxe 71 carbine. One long tang and the other short. The condition appears equal. But the pre auction estimates were quite different. with the long tang considerably higher( like twice as much).

Avatar
oldcrankyyankee
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 996
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
November 1, 2025 - 4:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Just went back and reviewed them. One pre war other from 53′

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13331
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
November 1, 2025 - 4:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

oldcrankyyankee said
Just went back and reviewed them. One pre war other from 53′
  

So, it really is a case of “Pre” and “Post” War.

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
oldcrankyyankee
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 996
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
November 1, 2025 - 4:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said

oldcrankyyankee said
Just went back and reviewed them. One pre war other from 53′
  

So, it really is a case of “Pre” and “Post” War.
  

Yes I would say so. Personally I will take the pre war anytime. I prefer to not have the holes in the receiver, and I like the 98 bolt peep sight also.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13331
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
November 1, 2025 - 5:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

oldcrankyyankee said

Bert H. said

oldcrankyyankee said
Just went back and reviewed them. One pre war other from 53′
  

So, it really is a case of “Pre” and “Post” War.
  

Yes I would say so. Personally I will take the pre war anytime. I prefer to not have the holes in the receiver, and I like the 98 bolt peep sight also.
  

As do I.

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6711
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
November 1, 2025 - 11:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I appreciated some of the post war design improvements on my 71 but when it came time to sell it I wish I’d had a pre-war as that would have been much easier to sell. 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Zebulon
Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1381
Member Since:
January 20, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
November 3, 2025 - 5:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

oldcrankyyankee said
That is an interesting opinion. I think I will have to agree with you on all counts. I was asking because I saw 2 different auctions and each one had a deluxe 71 carbine. One long tang and the other short. The condition appears equal. But the pre auction estimates were quite different. with the long tang considerably high11er( like twice as much).
  

Tom,  If you’re looking for one of the stubby 71s to hunt with, consider a welder’s mask to go with it. That .348 case was originally for the .50-110 WCF and holds a [large] pot full of IMR 3031. I once had a brief encounter with a 20″ barreled .348. Shooting on a cloudy day it gave me night blindness. 

As a collectible, I think they’re really neat. I hadn’t realized the 20″ style was even available postwar except as a parts cleanup.  Live and learn.

Bert, might there have been some overlap in checkering coverage and diamond size?  That is to say, might some very early postwar production have been fitted up with stocks checkered to the more generous pattern? 

- Bill 

 

WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist

"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13331
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
November 3, 2025 - 6:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Zebulon said

  

Bert, might there have been some overlap in checkering coverage and diamond size?  That is to say, might some very early postwar production have been fitted up with stocks checkered to the more generous pattern? 
  

None that I have observed.  Keep in mind that the WW II production hiatus lasted 3+ years.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
oldcrankyyankee
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 996
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
November 4, 2025 - 10:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Zebulon said

oldcrankyyankee said
That is an interesting opinion. I think I will have to agree with you on all counts. I was asking because I saw 2 different auctions and each one had a deluxe 71 carbine. One long tang and the other short. The condition appears equal. But the pre auction estimates were quite different. with the long tang considerably high11er( like twice as much).
  

Tom,  If you’re looking for one of the stubby 71s to hunt with, consider a welder’s mask to go with it. That .348 case was originally for the .50-110 WCF and holds a [large] pot full of IMR 3031. I once had a brief encounter with a 20″ barreled .348. Shooting on a cloudy day it gave me night blindness. 
As a collectible, I think they’re really neat. I hadn’t realized the 20″ style was even available postwar except as a parts cleanup.  Live and learn.
Bert, might there have been some overlap in checkering coverage and diamond size?  That is to say, might some very early postwar production have been fitted up with stocks checkered to the more generous pattern? 
  

Bill if I ever sock one away I be sure to go get one of those big dog collars at the vets and use it as flash hider then.Laugh

Avatar
Zebulon
Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1381
Member Since:
January 20, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
November 5, 2025 - 3:18 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Good idea.  

- Bill 

 

WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist

"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: Maverick, deerhunter, Bill Jokela, Ben, Glshuck
Guest(s) 319
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6711
Chuck: 6043
steve004: 5299
1873man: 4765
deerhunter: 2756
Big Larry: 2578
twobit: 2550
mrcvs: 2276
Maverick: 2062
Newest Members:
Pjlukefahr
Akreps
Big Mike 56
Papawsguns
ColtManCookson
Old-timer
Wdkirk01
F54
BPJACK
Badger557
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15078
Posts: 135553

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10228
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation