Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 1892 NOT SN 1433 @ Amoskeag
Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2505
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
1
November 7, 2018 - 10:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Good morning,

https://www.proxibid.com/Firearms-Military-Artifacts/Firearms/Early-Winchester-Model-1892-Special-Order-Takedown-Rifle/lotInformation/44818271

SN 1433 was a standard OB solid frame 44 WCF sporting rifle not a takedown frame.  The caliber stamp is on the left flat which is WRONG.  The hammer and lever are blued instead of case hardened which is WRONG.  This is not an “all-original first year of production special order 1892 rifle.”

Michael

459-1.jpgImage Enlarger

459.jpgImage Enlarger
Screenshot-2018-11-07-08.01.48.pngImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
sb
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 471
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
November 7, 2018 - 10:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Wonder if that might a model 53 frame that someone put an “antique” gun together with……

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2505
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
November 7, 2018 - 10:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

sb said
Wonder if that might a model 53 frame that someone put an “antique” gun together with……  

I would have to see the upper tang stamp to know that.  A Model 53 would have a Type 6 tang stamp vs. a Type 1 (photos)1892-Type-6.jpgImage Enlarger

on it which has NO model designation.  That would be pretty obvious to most collectors.  I think??!!  

 

Michael

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
sb
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 471
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
November 7, 2018 - 10:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Yes, the upper tang would make it clear but the auction house has conveniently forgotten to post any photos of the upper tang markings

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bill Hockett, steve004, twobit, slk, Blue Ridge Parson, SureShot, kevindpm61, WinKorm94
Guest(s) 456
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6468
Chuck: 5873
steve004: 5209
1873man: 4703
deerhunter: 2711
Big Larry: 2559
twobit: 2505
mrcvs: 2213
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
WinKorm94
Wallyg703
GunLegacy
tcwyb
spikemiller
ob98
Ricky Summer
Peter Cipollini
Jhark
Oldtimer52
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14814
Posts: 132574

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10050
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation