May 4, 2025
Offlinehttps://www.gunbroker.com/item/1153412841
so seen this today on the ole GB, wasn’t most trappers/16” and lower barrel lengths carbines? Letter in pictures claims it as carbine, I’m seeing a rifle forehand and barrel?👀 frankenwinchester or?
1873 and 92 collector
April 15, 2005
OfflineTedk said
Bert,
Wouldn’t a 16” barrel be noted on the factory letter for that gun or is a serialization date of Feb. 27 1906 too late for more detailed factory ledger records?
Yes, it would be listed if it is authentic.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

April 15, 2005
Offlinecj57 said
The letter states carbine and doesn’t list barrel length, so that means standard 20″, and this gun is a rifle, I would say it was put together in the not to distant past.
I missed seeing the letter… you are correct, that is a highly altered Carbine.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

December 9, 2002
OfflineOne of the great lessons in life is to get burnt, by spending you’re own hard earned money!!!
I do speak from older experiences, before we all carried a computer in our pockets, and the PC’s on our desks! 
Such is life, as experience being the tool to use, instead of the seven deadly sins, in some cases! 
Anthony
January 20, 2023
OfflineIs the Seller being clever by describing the item as a “rifle carbine” and disclosing the Cody letter, which by omission proves the original barrel length as 20″, at the very last of thirty photos? The more I read of his description, the more weasel words I find.
He implies Madis supports his assertions of rarity but does not cite any passage in any of that author’s published works.
Never does he say outright that the gun is unaltered and genuine.
Let’s see. The elements of fraud at common law are these: an intentional representation of fact that is false and is done knowingly or recklessly, with the intent that the other party rely upon it, and that the other party justifiably relied upon it to his financial detriment. All provable by direct and indirect evidence.
Usually, a false seller gets away with it because civil cases are expensive and not economically worth the time and trouble. Unless he defrauds an exceedingly wealthy and especially outraged buyer who also has influence in the State having jurisdiction. By that, I mean influence with the governor or the attorney general.
‐‐——————- Some typical defenses
I made an honest mistake.
What I wrote was only my opinion.
What I wrote was true.
I never said it was original and unaltered.
It was like it is when I bought it.
I sold the gun “as is”.
The buyer knew what he was getting.
The buyer should have known what he was getting.
The buyer suffered no loss because the gun is worth what he paid for it.
‐-‐—————————- Lifting the veil in deposition
In the context of a Winchester Model 1892, what is the physical difference between a carbine and a rifle?
In the same context, are carbines with barrels shorter than 20 inches rare?
More valuable?
In the same context, are rifles with barrels shorter than 24 inches rare?
More valuable?
I show you this bound book marked exhibit P-12, which has already been admitted in evidence as your official dealer record of firearm transactions. Please show me from whom you bought the Plaintiff’s rifle, exhibit P-1.
In what condition was the P-1 rifle when you bought it?
How much did you pay for it?
How long was the barrel?
Did you make any alterations to the P-1 rifle after you bought it?
Do you hold yourself out as an expert on Winchester short barreled Model 1892 rifles and carbines?
[Voir dire to disqualify Defendant as an expert on the particular subject.]
Have you read any of the works of Mr. Madis, the author to whom you referred in your auction description?
On what works did you rely in representing the P-1 rifle was rare?
Is originality of condition of any value in a rare firearm?
Rifle P-1, when you sold it, was not in factory original condition when you sold it. True?
and so on, throughout a very long day.
‐—‐———————–A LESSON FOR A PROSPECTIVE BIDDER.
ASK WRITTEN QUESTIONS AND GET WRITTEN ANSWERS, BEFORE YOU OFFER.
Unwitnessed oral representations are not worth the paper they are not written on. IF YOU GET WEASILY ANSWERS, DO WITHOUT. BUY THE GUN, NOT THE DESCRIPTION.
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.
December 9, 2002
OfflineZeb,
A very good observance once again on you’re part. I’ve noticed more and more the descriptions and or various words used or not, seem to dance around these questionable point, as almost planned or tactical in many write ups.
I’ll never be confused with any theology majors, or English language writer, as I’ve lacked those skills in my life., but some of these sellers are getting master full at their descriptions! IMHO!!!
Buyer must always beware!
Anthony
April 15, 2005
OfflineOK, this conversation has reminded me of the “Glossary of Terms” frequently used by many gun dealers and collectors, and what they truly mean. I am posting this for all to use as a “guide”, and I hope that it might clear some things up:
Feel free to add any that I may have missed…
Glossary of Terms used to describe old Guns
MINT CONDITION: Factory new, all original.
MINTY CONDITION: Same as above, except for the scattered pitting.
GOOD FOR ITS AGE: NRA poor to horrible.
SHOWS HONEST USE: A piece of junk!
SHOWS WEAR & USE: What is not worn paper thin is missing or broken.
GOOD REPRESENTATIVE PIECE: Almost looks like a gun.
ROUGH CONDITION: The outline of this rust-ball looks like it might have been a gun.
FANCY & GENUINELY OLD: Made in Hong Kong prior to 1975.
PRE REVOLUTIONARY: Made before some revolution, not the American.
PROBABLY CONFEDERATE: Probably NOT.
LOTS OF ORIGINAL FINISH: Two screw heads show some blue.
SOME ORIGINAL FINISH: One screw head shows some blue.
SMOOTH WEAR: All checkering, edges & lettering gone.
NICE AGE PATINA: Solid unblemished coat of rust.
WILL CLEAN UP: Maybe with an industrial wire wheel or sandblaster.
ACTION NEEDS MINOR TUNING: Internal parts broken, missing and can never be made to function again.
NEEDS A LITTLE WORK: The Springfield armory at it’s peak couldn’t repair it.
TIGHT: Amazing what a little epoxy glue can do.
SHOOTABLE: Only if you’re suicidal.
NEEDS A LITTLE TIGHTENING: Only one or two major parts have fallen off.
MINOR REPLACEMENT PARTS: The frame & maybe the barrel are original.
VERY GOOD BORE: Traces of rifling amid the pitting.
GOOD BORE: The pitting seems to form a pattern.
FAIR BORE: You can still see light through it.
POOR BORE: The dark at the end of the tunnel.
HAIRLINE CRACK: Stock split in two pieces.
SMALL CHIP IN STOCK: Nothing supports the barrel.
SMALL WOOD REPAIR: Replaced stock.
MINOR BUMPS & DINGS: The gun has been used as a hammer for at least two generations.
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

November 7, 2015
OfflineI’m an unabashed Madis fan but when somebody uses his writings to support claims of rarity or manufacture date it’s a red flag for me. I do enjoy some of the creative writing exercises we sometimes find disguised as descriptions, great entertainment. Funny thing is the gun appears to be an honest example in the pics with consistent wear and no sign of more than a passing encounter with our friend Bubba. I admit it’s a very unusual example and I likely missed a few issues but it could be the result of someone simply making the best of two or more damaged or unusable rifles to make one useable firearm instead of buying a new one. We live in a throwaway world, refreshing to think of a time where people would use their time and talent to fix stuff.
Mike
January 20, 2023
OfflineWithout the luxury of time and the power of a subpoena duces tecum, it would be impossible to know whether a seller with knowledge of the relative scarcity of short-barreled Winchester rifles versus short-barreled carbines deliberately cobbled a gun up for maximum gain. An alternative, innocent explanation of its origin offered by Mike is just as likely.
The physical condition of a gun that contradicts its own Cody letter – its obvious lack of originality – is by itself no evidence of wrongdoing.
If a seller were to say nothing at all, the “as is” terms of a sale would be the ball game, although a prudent and innocent seller should explicitly disavow any representations of originality. How many times have you asked some gun show table holder, “Is this finish original?” And had him answer, “Partner, I just don’t know.” Prudent and quasi-bulletproof, although not always innocent, particularly when his aftershave smells like Dulite.
It is (a) the explicit representation the gun is rare and valuable and (b) the implicit representation that it is true and original, that are wrongful and deceptive. “As is” is not a cure for lying.
To be actionable, those representations must have been made (a) knowingly or (b) recklessly.
It isn’t possible or necessary to get inside someone’s head to prove knowledge. Conduct, present and prior, can serve as proof. It is extremely difficult for a federally licensed firearms dealer with several thousand transactions under his belt to feign ignorance of what amounts to generally known facts in the industry. For example, if a dealer cites the name of a recognized expert in the field, such as “Hartman” or “Luttrell” it’s pretty hard to claim ignorance of the subject matter.
For our purposes, “recklessly” can be taken to mean, “whether he knew it or not, he should have known or looked it up.”
The statutes of limitation for such claims can be relatively short in some jurisdictions.
If I ever get back to Cody and you buy me enough good whiskey, I’ll confess my own scalping by a dishonorable, lying wretch who sold me a re-blued Savage 99 with substitute parts on GB. “Physician, heal thyself!”
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.
January 20, 2023
OfflineChuck said
I bet one of the best lessons you ever learned. I have had one too.
You know it.
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.
January 20, 2023
OfflineCowboy103 said
I thought about messaging the guy when I first seen it but probably would just get overlooked lol. I have messaged some people before when I seen mistakes and they updated the descriptions.
It would not be a bad idea to warn him the gun is cobbled up and why. That way, he can’t say he didn’t know and, if he really didn’t, He has an opportunity to avoid hurting somebody. He could make full disclosure and offer to release bids.
The Cody letter is conclusive – it was a 20″ carbine that’s been made into a rifle. It was never a “trapper”.
- Bill
WACA # 65205; life member, NRA; member, TGCA; member, TSRA; amateur preservationist
"I have seen wicked men and fools, a great many of both, and I believe they both get paid in the end, but the fools first." -- David Balfour, narrator and protagonist of the novel, Kidnapped, by Robert Louis Stevenson.
May 4, 2025
OfflineZebulon said
Cowboy103 said
I thought about messaging the guy when I first seen it but probably would just get overlooked lol. I have messaged some people before when I seen mistakes and they updated the descriptions.
It would not be a bad idea to warn him the gun is cobbled up and why. That way, he can’t say he didn’t know and, if he really didn’t, He has an opportunity to avoid hurting somebody. He could make full disclosure and offer to release bids.
The Cody letter is conclusive – it was a 20″ carbine that’s been made into a rifle. It was never a “trapper”.
I sent him a message. We will see if he responds
1873 and 92 collector
1 Guest(s)
Log In

