Log In
June 26, 2013
Offline
Would love to hear what the experts think.
November 7, 2015
Offline
Appears to be a broken link or it was taken down.
Mike
May 26, 2017
Offline
He has two up there if the one link doesn’t work try the other and look at sellers other items
May 26, 2017
Offline
I just wonder if it’s the same gentleman I met at a show in November/or January, if it is he taught me that the width of the muzzle was the best way to make sure it hadn’t been cut down. Super nice guy with a table full of really nice stuff. He even let me hold something he had stashed under the table,it was a musket and it’s pathetic that I can’t remember what it was. It was the kid in the candy store syndrome- trying to learn as much as possible while trying to retain more than 25%.
November 1, 2013
Offline
51 active listings on GI; not exactly an “amateur” gun-dealer, I’d say.
April 15, 2005
Online
I would really like to see the Winchester address roll marking on the barrel. Based on what I am seeing, somebody is either scary good at making a fake Trapper, or it is most likely the real thing.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
November 8, 2011
Offline
If I’m seeing the pictures correctly, both guns are in the letterable range.
June 26, 2013
Offline
I believe the 17 inch carbine was in the 900000 range but can’t view either of the photos since both sold already. Anyone here snatch them up?
November 8, 2011
Offline
You’re right. I looked at the serial number photos and I thought they both started with 3 but the 17″ has a much later upper tang mark.
July 8, 2012
Offline
I think it’s a very good restoration and not original. My two cents..
Al
May 26, 2017
Offline
So it drove me crazy all day, so I got home and thumbed through some old WACA magazines and sure enough, I found a picture of the gentleman with the listings( at least I believe it to be) it is the guy I talked to recently and having never been to Cody(which is what show this picture is from) someone might recognize him
May 2, 2009
Offline
They haven’t sold and are still on GI. The 17″ looks like its 927912
Bob
WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's
Email: [email protected]
April 15, 2005
Online
Bo
1873man said
They haven’t sold and are still on GI. The 17″ looks like its 927912Bob
Bob,
I get the message that they are both sold ? Is there an option to view or search completed listings ?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
May 2, 2009
Offline
Bert,
I’m just clicking on the links above. It takes me right to them.
Bob
WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's
Email: [email protected]
November 1, 2013
Offline
1873man said
Bert,I’m just clicking on the links above. It takes me right to them.
Bob
I can find the un-sold 16″, but not the sold 17″, & no way to search “sold” that I can find.
May 2, 2009
Offline
I click on the 17″ link and it takes me to it.
Bob
WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's
Email: [email protected]
November 1, 2013
Offline
1873man said
I click on the 17″ link and it takes me to it.Bob
You must have the secret password–“listing not found” is what I get. Anybody else?
May 2, 2009
Offline
Here is a copy of the serial number.
Bob
WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's
Email: [email protected]
March 31, 2009
Offline
Can anyone make out the first number of the serial number? I can’t. This gun scares me. I want to say the bluing on the receiver looks too thick?
June 26, 2013
Offline
Chuck said
Can anyone make out the first number of the serial number? I can’t. This gun scares me. I want to say the bluing on the receiver looks too thick?
Looks like serial number 927912 to me. That would make it consistent with the upper tang marking.
