Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Groove variations
Avatar
FromTheWoods
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 532
Member Since:
December 27, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 27, 2016 - 4:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I noticed in a couple rifles with a serial number just over a million, that the grooves in the bores don’t show up as distinctly as in the 500,000’s and under.  I don’t know where the change occurred.  My bore-vision is not so good anymore, or I would attempt an accurate description.

In Renneberg’s book, he states that Winchester experimented with groove widths and depths.

Is there one type of rifling/groove configuration that shoots more accurately than other types?

Does one type work better with jacketed bullets?  –with cast?  –slower/faster bullets?  –stays cleaner/dirtier?

Differences in wear/life of the bore?

Twist rates for individual calibers has not been influenced by the groove depth changes?

In my old set-in-your-ways personality, I’d choose the standard distinct grooves of the earlier rifles over the slick/can hardly see them newer grooves.

Avatar
Vince
SO. Oregon
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 687
Member Since:
June 5, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 27, 2016 - 6:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

If would take a considerably large book to answer your questions. In fact some of them, concerning Winchester’s experiments with twists and rifling, can not be answered because nobody saved the ballistic research papers. After all, who would be interested in all the failed trials? And much of the results were manufacturing secrets. Why let competition know what does and doesn’t work. They had to develop groove numbers, ratios between grooves and lands, and twist rates for every new or experimental rounds. They tested existing designs to try and improve designs and get an important leg up on the competition. To me, the most fun experiments would be the “what happens if we….”
I couldn’t think of a more interesting job than being in the Winchester lab during the glory days of Winchester. They were the first to photograph a fired bullet head on as it exited the barrel. And they did that just for fun out of curiosity.

Has anybody here ever visited the, now long gone, underground firing range Winchester had? Or is that just another fable told to a Connecticut youth a long time ago.

Vince
Southern Oregon
NRA member
Fraternal Order of Eagles

 “There is but one answer to be made to the dynamite bomb and that can best be made by the Winchester rifle.”

Teddy Roosevelt 

4029-1.jpg

Avatar
FromTheWoods
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 532
Member Since:
December 27, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 27, 2016 - 6:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Well, Vince, you have a few sentences here–when will the book be published?

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: 1ned1, 86Win, kevindpm61
Guest(s) 683
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6573
Chuck: 5943
steve004: 5239
1873man: 4719
deerhunter: 2717
Big Larry: 2567
twobit: 2514
mrcvs: 2217
Maverick: 2043
Newest Members:
KPotter44
Trip
eddixon
Rifleman Rifle
tourman40
rifleman
Surfertim
6564yankees
Fox Creek
kellswater
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14893
Posts: 133489

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10115
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation