Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Early model 1892 take-down with odd magazine tube
Avatar
Cornbinder
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
March 24, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
September 7, 2025 - 12:21 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I recently acquired an early model small-caliber 1892 (20744) with a take-down frame and an odd magazine tube. It’s one-piece, with a slightly dished-out  end and knurled half an inch down the tube, to facilitate getting a grip on it to turn it. It’s 15 1/2-inches long, and has the correct threads on the open end to turn into the receiver. This gun came out of an estate, where it was sitting in a warehouse for multiple decades, if not half a century or more. To get the rifle, I also had to take the 1953 barrel dated Remington Sportsman 48 12 ga. shotgun that also came from the same place, which makes me think that they’ve been parked for 50-60 years. As such, I needed some penetrating oil to spin the mag tube out by hand (if this was the first model of take-down mag tube, I can see why they went to the folding lever patented in 1893).

The kicker is that way back in the ’30’s to 50’s, the original barrel was changed out for one from a model 65 in 218 Bee (stamped 218B on the bottom, and I can’t find a date code, so would that make it a replacement barrel instead of one pulled off a rifle?). Since 65’s are solid frame guns, they spun the barrel through the take-down barrel adapter, so it’s now a forced solid frame. With the mag tube in place, it’s roughly 2/3 length compared to the 24″ 218 Bee barrel. I’m also of the opinion that the bolt on the rifle is from a model 65, since it’s drilled and tapped for a bolt top sight (from what I’ve researched, they were standard on a mod. 65 in 218 Bee).

The good folks at Cody did a records search, and it checks out being built as a take-down with an octagon 32 WCF barrel (it still has the octo forearm), plain trigger, SNA on Nov. 22, 1893, sent into the warehouse on Feb. 6, 1894, leaving 6 days later. That’s it.

Having been converted/messed with, I can’t be certain that this is the original mag tube, but I find it hard to believe that the “gunsmith” pulled another manufacturer’s mag tube out if his parts bin and made it fit. Yet stranger things have happened. On that note, the magazine spring follower was a spent .30 Remington case with the neck cut off!20250831_172740.jpg20250831_172448.jpg

After trying to hunt down early take-down frame 1892’s in reference books and the interwebs, I’ve yet to find anything (even misinformation), so I’m posting it here. 

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12975
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
September 7, 2025 - 12:32 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I am not of the opinion that the magazine tube is factory original.  It appears to have been manufactured for the rifle when the Model 65 barrel was fitted to the take down extension.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Cornbinder
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
March 24, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
September 7, 2025 - 4:36 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thanks for your perusal and opinion. 

One of these days (winter, most likely), I need to sit down and get some serial numbers & data to your database for my 1894’s, model 55’s, and model 64’s. Mostly in 32 WS because my family is 3-generations of funny that way.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12975
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
September 7, 2025 - 4:45 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Cornbinder said
Thanks for your perusal and opinion. 
One of these days (winter, most likely), I need to sit down and get some serial numbers & data to your database for my 1894’s, model 55’s, and model 64’s. Mostly in 32 WS because my family is 3-generations of funny that way.
  

I will look forward to it.  My surveys are still growing at a reasonable rate, but I always have room for more data. Cool

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2504
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
5
September 7, 2025 - 2:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Good morning,

As Bert mentioned the magazine is definitely not original to the rifle.  It should look like the one in the attached image.  You rifle is one of a batch of 60 identical rifles that were manufactured.  I have included a portion of my survey spreadsheet that includes your SN.

Michael

pix176112076.jpegScreenshot-2025-09-07-at-10.43.50 AM.png

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Cornbinder
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
March 24, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
September 7, 2025 - 3:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Thanks for the update – and your survey data. I guess that’s one less Winchester to report into the survey team (although I also have a 4-digit SN 1892 round barrel in 38-40 I need to send particulars your way).

Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2504
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
7
September 7, 2025 - 3:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Cornbinder said
Thanks for the update – and your survey data. I guess that’s one less Winchester to report into the survey team (although I also have a 4-digit SN 1892 round barrel in 38-40 I need to send particulars your way).
  

That would be great.  Thanks

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5209
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
September 7, 2025 - 6:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Cornbinder said
Thanks for your perusal and opinion. 
One of these days (winter, most likely), I need to sit down and get some serial numbers & data to your database for my 1894’s, model 55’s, and model 64’s. Mostly in 32 WS because my family is 3-generations of funny that way.
  

Wow,  I do resonate with that Cool

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: twobit, sb, Manuel, oldcrankyyankee, Jeremy P, MidwestCrisis
Guest(s) 199
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6439
Chuck: 5856
steve004: 5209
1873man: 4702
deerhunter: 2709
Big Larry: 2553
twobit: 2504
mrcvs: 2210
Maverick: 2042
Newest Members:
Oldtimer52
parkerposy
rayhobbs
WebleyScott
Task1
1886
Jerome Stevens
Arkansas mike
Freeweb1991
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14802
Posts: 132442

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10042
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation