
deerhunter
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2696
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
June 26, 2013

It’s my opinion that this carbine has been refinished. No saddle ring wear and the markings, especially the proof marks look re-stamped or engraved. Compare the proof marks to other Winchesters and there’s an obvious difference.
Don

JWA
Location: 32000' +
Admin
Forum Posts: 2566
Member Since:
July 17, 2012
July 17, 2012

Yes, they look funky to me. I agree, it looks like the receiver proof has been chased with a graver.
Regards,
WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: 426crown, tionesta1, Tony. R, Byron Russell, Tedk, Chris D, winfan, Edward Kitner, Pwog
Guest(s) 162
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6410
Chuck: 5812
steve004: 5174
1873man: 4700
deerhunter: 2696
Big Larry: 2550
twobit: 2494
mrcvs: 2195
Maverick: 2032
Newest Members:
Popsguns
Ernie Dyess
Noah Hutchens
clayboy702003
Sans Peur
Crucian66
Winchester 1892
Temomar83
ross
Model94-2025
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14725
Posts: 131712
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9990
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
© Simple:Press —
