Log In
Members
Home
Add Reply
Add Topic
Offline
steve004 said
28 gauge said
steve004 said
Don’t forget the .45 Colt. I actually had one (angle eject).Do not remember the .45 Colt.Was it a U.S. made rifle or a Japanese made rifle?
Mine was U.S. made rifle. I will admit I am more warmed up to these post-64 rifles than had been my history. By the way, mine was a rifle and not a carbine. 24″ barrel if I recall correctly.
Very interesting,especially with a 24 inch barrel.
Like you, I am warming up to the post 64 rifles as well.I suppose with the price of the pre 64 Winchesters getting so high,it makes the post 64 Winchesters look more interesting.
28 gauge said
Very interesting,especially with a 24 inch barrel.
Like you, I am warming up to the post 64 rifles as well.I suppose with the price of the pre 64 Winchesters getting so high,it makes the post 64 Winchesters look more interesting.
There are quite a few interesting variations and chamberings out there. On the topic of U.S. made 94’s in .45 Colt, I see gunbroker presently has three different trapper carbines. Three different sellers but the serial numbers are pretty close. No rifles that I could see. I recall my rifle had a checkered buttstock and forearm.
Ok, how about this. In 2003 the Winchester catalog listed the M94 was available in the .480 Ruger. Anyone ever seen one? Not me.
steve004 said
Ok, how about this. In 2003 the Winchester catalog listed the M94 was available in the .480 Ruger. Anyone ever seen one? Not me.
Have never seen one either.
1 Guest(s)
