Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Another 1892 TD
Avatar
Thomas Foster
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 22
Member Since:
August 15, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
November 7, 2016 - 12:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

IMG_0447.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_0448.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_0449.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_0450.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_0451.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_0452.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_0453.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_0454.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_0455.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_0456.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_0457.JPGImage EnlargerHi All, here is another 1892 that is for sale locally and I’m hoping for some input as to fair value. Any advice is surely welcomed. I’m sorry for the pictures being upside down, I don’t know why this happens.

thank you,

Tom

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
twobit
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2493
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
November 7, 2016 - 1:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Good morning Tom,

Based on the serial number the rifle was manufactured during 1899.  It is 100% original and I doubt it has ever been “taken down” in its life.  There is not the least hint of a scratch to the bluing at the magazine retaining band.  The stamp styles and locations are correct for the SN range of the gun.  I would suspect that the bore is most likely perfect because it does not look like the rifle has been used much.  It is just 117 years old.  The bluing is pretty much gone from the receiver and the balance haas turned to the typical brown patina often seen.  This will keep the “condition hounds” from having an interest in the rifle but there are still lots of guys who would like it.  It should be a very accurate shooting rifle.  I would not go beyond $3000 for it and start thinking hard above $2500.  

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Avatar
Thomas Foster
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 22
Member Since:
August 15, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
November 8, 2016 - 2:00 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Michael, thank you very much for your advice. Yes, the bore looks “new” and the action feels solid. I’ll talk to the owner tomorrow and see what is fair for both of us.

Tom

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: 450 Fuller, Pwog, Dannyb
Guest(s) 169
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6408
Chuck: 5808
steve004: 5173
1873man: 4698
deerhunter: 2694
Big Larry: 2549
twobit: 2493
mrcvs: 2194
Maverick: 2029
Newest Members:
Model94-2025
R.E. Moore
sjGUESTEST
WindsurfAruba
cedar swamp savage
tradecraft
Weida78
Alby
Lambeau
Larsmack
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14714
Posts: 131624

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9981
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation