Log In
April 30, 2006
Offline
A rare bird indeed. I’m a little "cash poor" right now – perhaps one of you should jump on this amazing specimen.
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=418321583
March 20, 2009
Online
Let’s see. Wrong caliber, wrong (should not be) proof stamped, wrong hammer, serial number is not centered, and wrong tang stamp for starters.
Michael
Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation
April 15, 2005
Online
I sent the seller a message informing him that he is attempting to sell an illegally altered firearm, and that based on the hammer type and the upper tang marking, that it was actually manufactured sometime between April 1903 and December 1909. I also suggested that he remove the auction listing.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
January 24, 2013
Offline
And the lever is bent
But he does have a couple of white smoke grenades for sale 🙂
September 9, 2011
Offline
Everything seems correct on this gun, except the FAKE serial number.
April 15, 2005
Online
oakridge said
Everything seems correct on this gun, except the FAKE serial number.
It is more accurate to say "Illegally ALTERED" serial number.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
April 30, 2006
Offline
Are you sure that’s not the ultra-rare special order lever? What about the fact that it’s not a first model (in the very scarce 25-35 especially)?
April 15, 2005
Online
The seller sent me the following reply message;
"Thank you very much. I have contacted gun broker to get it removed. Thanks so much for passing on some knowledge.
Greatly appreciated.
George Lane"
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
1 Guest(s)
