Here is one for you model 70 guys. I don’t know if the starting price is realistic or a wish. It sure looks like the real deal to me….
https://www.gunbroker.com/item/819344364
Erin
November 5, 2014

All-
Sorry I missed this fun, as the gun now appears to have been sold. I was working today so just picked up this thread…
NO… I did not jump in and buy it, but if it’s legit that was a danged good price. I’d’ve enjoyed getting a hands-on look at it…
Basically, the S/N range is OK and the rifle looks correct. I have only one of these and I believe it legit. The S/N is 336998. The tall Win 22K is correct for a LC FWT of 1955.
IMHO the biggest question (that we will not likely resolve here) is the caliber designation stamp. There are two commonly encountered stamps… One is marked “358 WIN.-” the other is marked “358 WIN.-” where the “5” is slightly smaller than the “3” and “8”… I don’t know how to replicate this – change point – on the website, sorry…
This gun has the smaller “5” as far as I can tell. In some circles, that is taken as a sign the barrel is rebored and fake. My own opinion having handled several of these, seen several more on-line, etc. is that there were two stamps and the one on this gun is one of those two. Others will surely disagree…
Anybody have an answer to this??? I’d say I see nothing wrong with the gun… The accoutrement OTOH…
Lou
WACA 9519; Studying Pre-64 Model 70 Winchesters
I was watching this gun also. When they don’t sell fast enough I always figure someone (probably from this group) has spotted something wrong. That goes both ways, I have seen a 1895 sell quickly with, a well done, “405” hand engraved on the barrel that sold for 5 or 6K. I figure better to see one go instead of learning a $4,000 lesson.
1 Guest(s)
