Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1895 find!
Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13195
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
21
October 23, 2025 - 11:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

helidriver72 said

View post on imgur.com


heres the serial number search from the Cody museum it just says checkered pistol grip.
  

The CFM research sheet tells us that the crescent rifle butt was the original configuration.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
helidriver72
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 38
Member Since:
December 9, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
22
October 24, 2025 - 6:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Is it possible that the stock came the way it is from the factory? The fit and finish is so precise??

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5263
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
23
October 24, 2025 - 11:36 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

I sure like that rifle.  A flat side pistol grip with !  The pistol grip feature is very uncommon (and desirable).  The fact that it was drilled and tapped makes it much more affordable – which it sounds like it was for you.  Look at it this way – if it had never been modified – it would have sold for much more and probably never made its way to your collection.  

Were it mine, I’d leave the sight.  Taking the sight off wouldn’t remove the holes.  For me, it would make the holes more noticeable.  

The modification at the heel is a puzzle.  I can’t make it out very well. Posting some close-up photos would help.  

By the  way, I’d be interested in Mark Douglas’s thoughts.  This is his kind of rifle!

Avatar
tim tomlinson
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 950
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
24
October 24, 2025 - 12:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I will just say, the butt stock did not come from the factory with the evident work/splice at the butt plate.  QC would not allow it in the untoward effort.  Now,  the front end where it is fit to the receiver may be original.  Was there some serious damage at the butt plate area that was repaired?  Could be, but again, not by Winchester as they would have replaced the stock in its entirety.  Tim

Avatar
helidriver72
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 38
Member Since:
December 9, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
25
October 24, 2025 - 1:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

steve004 said
I sure like that rifle.  A flat side pistol grip with !  The pistol grip feature is very uncommon (and desirable).  The fact that it was drilled and tapped makes it much more affordable – which it sounds like it was for you.  Look at it this way – if it had never been modified – it would have sold for much more and probably never made its way to your collection.  
Were it mine, I’d leave the sight.  Taking the sight off wouldn’t remove the holes.  For me, it would make the holes more noticeable.  
The modification at the heel is a puzzle.  I can’t make it out very well. Posting some close-up photos would help.  
By the  way, I’d be interested in Mark Douglas’s thoughts.  This is his kind of rifle!
  

I agree with your thoughts, I never thought I would hold a pistol grip flatside much less own one! Only 310 total made according to the book!
Im in Colorado on an elk hunt right now but when I get home I’ll get some closer pictures of the stock. The fit and finish of the splice is very good but a splice none the less. The action is incredibly smooth, more so than the second models I own.

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5263
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
26
October 24, 2025 - 2:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

helidriver72 said

steve004 said
I sure like that rifle.  A flat side pistol grip with !  The pistol grip feature is very uncommon (and desirable).  The fact that it was drilled and tapped makes it much more affordable – which it sounds like it was for you.  Look at it this way – if it had never been modified – it would have sold for much more and probably never made its way to your collection.  
Were it mine, I’d leave the sight.  Taking the sight off wouldn’t remove the holes.  For me, it would make the holes more noticeable.  
The modification at the heel is a puzzle.  I can’t make it out very well. Posting some close-up photos would help.  
By the  way, I’d be interested in Mark Douglas’s thoughts.  This is his kind of rifle!
  

I agree with your thoughts, I never thought I would hold a pistol grip flatside much less own one! Only 310 total made according to the book!
Im in Colorado on an elk hunt right now but when I get home I’ll get some closer pictures of the stock. The fit and finish of the splice is very good but a splice none the less. The action is incredibly smooth, more so than the second models I own.
  

First of all, very cool that you’re on an elk hunt right now.

I have owned a couple of flat sides and their actions were also smoother than the second models I’ve owned.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13195
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
27
October 24, 2025 - 4:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

helidriver72 said
Is it possible that the stock came the way it is from the factory? The fit and finish is so precise??
  

In answer to your question, No, it is extremely unlikely that Winchester pieced together two separate pieces of wood, especially on a Fancy Sporting rifle.  There are a lot of very talented wood workers that could have done the work.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5960
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
28
October 24, 2025 - 4:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Bert H. said

helidriver72 said
Is it possible that the stock came the way it is from the factory? The fit and finish is so precise??
  

In answer to your question, No, it is extremely unlikely that Winchester pieced together two separate pieces of wood, especially on a Fancy Sporting rifle.  There are a lot of very talented wood workers that could have done the work.
Bert
  

Why isn’t Fancy mentioned in the letter?  I still believe this stock was cut and later put back together.  Never in your lifetime could you match the grain pattern so well.  I have repaired dozens of stocks and matching grain this well on all 4 sides is impossible. 

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13195
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
29
October 24, 2025 - 5:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Chuck said

Bert H. said

helidriver72 said
Is it possible that the stock came the way it is from the factory? The fit and finish is so precise??
  

In answer to your question, No, it is extremely unlikely that Winchester pieced together two separate pieces of wood, especially on a Fancy Sporting rifle.  There are a lot of very talented wood workers that could have done the work.
Bert
  

Why isn’t Fancy mentioned in the letter?
  

It is… you just have to read between the lines.  The “Checkered stock, Pistol grip” in the ledger records is the code word for “Fancy Sporting rifle“.  Winchester very seldom ever recorded the catalog name in the ledger records.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5960
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30
October 24, 2025 - 5:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Bert H. said

Chuck said

Bert H. said

helidriver72 said
Is it possible that the stock came the way it is from the factory? The fit and finish is so precise??
  

In answer to your question, No, it is extremely unlikely that Winchester pieced together two separate pieces of wood, especially on a Fancy Sporting rifle.  There are a lot of very talented wood workers that could have done the work.
Bert
  

Why isn’t Fancy mentioned in the letter?
  

It is… you just have to read between the lines.  The “Checkered stock, Pistol grip” in the ledger records is the code word for “Fancy Sporting rifle”.  Winchester very seldom ever recorded the catalog name in the ledger records.
Bert
  

Bert, you are correct.  I thought that it was mentioned. 

Avatar
86Win
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 328
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
31
October 24, 2025 - 5:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Can I assume that my 1885 single shot which letters for checkered pistol grip is a “fancy sporting rifle”? Don

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13195
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
32
October 24, 2025 - 5:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

86Win said
Can I assume that my 1885 single shot which letters for checkered pistol grip is a “fancy sporting rifle”? Don
  

Don,

No, you cannot.  Winchester manufactured three different variants (grades) of the Single Shot model that were standard with a checkered pistol grip stock (not the case with the lever-action models).  The rest of the information on your factory letter will determine which of those three that it is.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 5406
Currently Online: Bert H., twobit, 1873man, Byron Russell, Palle Heine Jensen, [email protected], Glshuck
Guest(s) 251
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6614
Chuck: 5959
steve004: 5263
1873man: 4729
deerhunter: 2718
Big Larry: 2574
twobit: 2535
mrcvs: 2228
Maverick: 2046
Newest Members:
Danmat
WH93
LouP
Snakefish
Majestic kid
Greevesman
JMB117
Charming Buffalo
Wade M. Schuster
PatsTreasure
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14945
Posts: 134054

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10148
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation