Log In
December 1, 2012
Offline
Saw this new listing on Mertz and was initially interested: http://merzantiques.com/item/winchester-model-1892-special-order-rifle2.
Sent them an email inquiring about the “antique” classification since it is from 1900 per Cody and 1896 per Madis. Asked about whether they require shipping to an FFL dealer or not, as I don’t have such a license. But then, after re-looking at the listing it seems to me this is not such a unique specimen after all. It appears the half octagon barrel is a later replacement, aside from the fact that the original semi-buckhorn sight has been removed.
I haven’t gotten a response yet but think I’ll pass on this one after all. Anyone spot any other irregularities?
"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
August 11, 2015
Offline
only comment I would make is the Winchester proof mark on the barrel. Don’t know if the picture is showing the remains of a proof mark on the receiver, but I am under the impression that both were stamped when manufactured. Even if both are stamped, am also under the impression that the proof stamp was not standard until 1905, which would take it out of the official antique category of being built at or before 1898.
I have a couple of 1892’s in the antique category, and mine all have the same barrel/magazine finish as the receiver; the barrel/magazine on the questioned gun looks a lot better condition than the receiver. Would make me think that in addition to the proof mark issue, perhaps it was a replacement barrel and magazine.
Should be able to run the serial number thru Cody which would tend to address some of the issues.
Regards
March 20, 2009
Offline
Wincacher,
The receiver was serialized during 1900. The barrel is not original to the rifle. You should REALLY have a Cody membership and have them run any pre 380000 serial number for you.
Michael
Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation
