Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1885 flat spring change to coil
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Ontario Canada
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 584
Member Since:
April 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 19, 2015 - 3:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bert Do you know the last 1885 flatspring  by Date , and ser #? I realize there was a transition period that was pretty well switched over to coil by 1908? My flatspring Schuetzen Ser#107219 was applied Jan 25 1908 , received in warehouse May 29 1909.

As I understand the change was mostly done to be able to offer the perceived desireable Take-down feature ?

Other reasons for change ? pressure for (safety feature ?)  the hammer rest in half-cock ? cheaper to manufacture?

Thanks

Phil

Phils-Schuetzen-compressed.jpg 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12568
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
January 19, 2015 - 4:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Phil,

The transition from the flat-spring actions to the coil-spring actions took place over many years. In fact, there were still flat-spring actions assembled as late as 1920 (near the end of the Model 1885 production).  Based on my observations over the past many years, I have encountered dozens of late production (post 1910) sporting rifles that were flat-spring actions. I would estimate that roughly 50% of the Sporting Rifles made through the year 1914 are flat-spring actions (up to serial number 115000). After that time, they become increasingly rarer, but a few still show up.

As for the reason why the coil-spring action was created, it was specifically for the Take Down feature.  At some point after 1910, Winchester decided to make all actions for the coil-spring, and marked the “A” on the end of the lower tang.  I have found several late production factory original flat-spring actions that have the “A” on the lower tang… in fact, I own one (114429).

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Ontario Canada
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 584
Member Since:
April 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
January 19, 2015 - 5:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks BERT Is yours a third model Schuetzen with slightly different stock , and last Laudensack Butt ? any other changes ? Mine letters with Helm , and I believe its a standard 2nd model ?

Phil

Phils-Schuetzen-compressed.jpg 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12568
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 19, 2015 - 5:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Phil,

It is the center rifle in my signature picture (the 405 WCF).

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6174
Chuck: 5607
steve004: 5028
1873man: 4656
Big Larry: 2503
twobit: 2475
mrcvs: 2126
Maverick: 1930
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14414
Posts: 128239

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2019
Members: 9775
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation