Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1873 Carbine What Do I Have ?
Avatar
Old Guns
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 107
Member Since:
December 26, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
November 8, 2022 - 3:23 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

I bought this one today. Serial number 98795, 44-40 Carbine built in 1882. The gun despite the terrible cleaning job is in very good condition with all edges crisp and the bore like new.  The screw slots are all straight.  The wood fits perfectly and is mostly free from dents with what looks like the original finish.  The tang is marked 3403 C and the wood and buttplate are both marked 3403 as well.  I can’t decide if the wood is Walnut or Gum. The off thing is the 1866 Carbine barrel and sight with what looks like an 1880 patent date  The sight is the correct backwards sight for this barrel that as mentioned has a mint bore.  I have other pictures if you need to see something else.

 

 

THIS ALL STARTED WITH JUST ONE GUN!

IMG_4414-Copy.JPG

 

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4877
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
November 8, 2022 - 4:56 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The patent date is 1860 not 1880 but otherwise it has the normal barrel for a carbine of the era. The 73 carbine shared the same barrel features of the 66 carbine. The reverse sight is correct as well.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Old Guns
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 107
Member Since:
December 26, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
November 8, 2022 - 5:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

So it looks like someone took a near mint gun and ruined it with a piece of sandpaper.

THIS ALL STARTED WITH JUST ONE GUN!

IMG_4414-Copy.JPG

 

Avatar
1873man
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4877
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
November 8, 2022 - 5:39 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The gun was not near mint but it didn’t deserve that kind of treatment. It looks like they tried to remove the patina finish. Bubba strikes again.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
TR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1962
Member Since:
June 4, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
November 8, 2022 - 11:51 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

   Walnut would be correct for the time period. It looks like walnut to me. T/R

Avatar
mike webb
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 217
Member Since:
March 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
November 11, 2022 - 7:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

WHY OH WHY CAN’T PEOPLE LEAVE THINGS ALONE? Really nice carbine except for the emery cloth attack.

Avatar
Chuck
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6551
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
November 13, 2022 - 7:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

1873man said
The patent date is 1860 not 1880 but otherwise it has the normal barrel for a carbine of the era. The 73 carbine shared the same barrel features of the 66 carbine. The reverse sight is correct as well.

Bob

  

Bob, why does this gun have assembly numbers?

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 21294
Currently Online: oldcrankyyankee
Guest(s) 663
Top Posters:
TXGunNut: 7196
clarence: 7119
Chuck: 6551
steve004: 5564
1873man: 4877
deerhunter: 2887
twobit: 2668
Big Larry: 2578
mrcvs: 2398
Maverick: 2172
Newest Members:
1stpersonshoot3r
Lastwagen
smokumjames
ken1989
tcweerts
neon
bumppo
Frag
Dozer
Palijim
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 15676
Posts: 142461

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10556
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation